Re: [arch-general] Status of dcron

2011-05-01 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Sunday 01 May 2011 21:43:42 Jim Pryor wrote: > I suggest these changes: > > --- PKGBUILD2011-05-01 21:30:00.046676526 -0400 > +++ PKGBUILD.new2011-05-01 21:35:10.066676512 -0400 > @@ -38,5 +38,8 @@ > install -D -m0600 extra/root.crontab "$pkgdir/var/spool/cron/root" > install -D

Re: [arch-general] Status of dcron

2011-05-01 Thread Jim Pryor
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 04:06:47AM +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Jim Pryor wrote: > > v4.5 was released as a tarball at > > ; but Paul won't be able to > > package it right away. > > > Pierre already built a 4.5 package, which is current in testing >

Re: [arch-general] Status of dcron

2011-05-01 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
Jim Pryor wrote: > v4.5 was released as a tarball at ; > but Paul won't be able to package it right away. > Pierre already built a 4.5 package, which is current in testing http://www.archlinux.org/packages/testing/i686/dcron Greg

Re: [arch-general] Status of dcron

2011-05-01 Thread Jim Pryor
The git repo has been updated in the way I described. There's a single branch, whose history looks like this: tag="v4.4" ...many many commits... tag="reverted" (back to v4.4) ...a few commits... tag="v4.5" ...one or two more commits... (someday soon I will rebase all the

Re: [arch-general] Why are financial contributions not accepted?

2011-05-01 Thread Cédric Girard
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Seblu wrote: > What about create a association elsewhere in the world where it can be > less expensive? > > In France, we have an "association law 1901" > (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_loi_de_1901) which allow a > no taxes status. > I was also thinking

Re: [arch-general] Why are financial contributions not accepted?

2011-05-01 Thread Seblu
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote: > >> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Allan McRae wrote: >> >> > On 01/05/11 15:35, Johannes Held wrote: >> > >> >> On 01.05.2011 04:13, Ray Kohler wrote: >> >> >> >>> I also have donated i

Re: [arch-general] Status of dcron

2011-05-01 Thread Johannes Held
On 01.05.2011 19:00, Jim Pryor wrote: I don't know yet how to push a new local branch to remote, though I know I'll be able to figure it out. That would be git push origin new_local_branch -- Johannes

Re: [arch-general] what about a gtk3-docs package?

2011-05-01 Thread Aljosha Papsch
On 05/01/2011 18:57, Ionut Biru wrote: >On 05/01/2011 07:48 PM, Aljosha Papsch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I recently installed the dev tools for GNOME development and wondered why >> devhelp displayed no documentation for GTK3. Apparently there is no >> gtk3-docs package. Is it intented to not have

Re: [arch-general] Why are financial contributions not accepted?

2011-05-01 Thread solsTiCe d'Hiver
Le samedi 30 avril 2011 à 22:13 -0400, Ray Kohler a écrit : > The donations were done via PayPal and those in charge decided PayPal > wasn't trustworthy for use by non-profit organizations who don't have > official government non-profit status. The last time I donated was via Flattr. Not just a s

Re: [arch-general] what about a gtk3-docs package?

2011-05-01 Thread Ionut Biru
On 05/01/2011 07:48 PM, Aljosha Papsch wrote: Hi, I recently installed the dev tools for GNOME development and wondered why devhelp displayed no documentation for GTK3. Apparently there is no gtk3-docs package. Is it intented to not have that package (which makes no sense as there is the gtk

Re: [arch-general] Status of dcron

2011-05-01 Thread Jim Pryor
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 04:01:01PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > On Sun, 1 May 2011 03:33:37 -0400, Jim Pryor wrote: > > ... > > As I said, my source tree contains a large refactoring push. I have > > deferred this, and back-ported some important bugfixes, and a few simple > > features or packagin

[arch-general] what about a gtk3-docs package?

2011-05-01 Thread Aljosha Papsch
Hi, I recently installed the dev tools for GNOME development and wondered why devhelp displayed no documentation for GTK3. Apparently there is no gtk3-docs package. Is it intented to not have that package (which makes no sense as there is the gtk2-docs package)? Now that GNOME 3 moved to [extr

Re: [arch-general] Why are financial contributions not accepted?

2011-05-01 Thread Martin Zecher
What about Google Checkout? On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote: > > > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > > > > > On 01/05/11 15:35, Johannes Held wrote: > > > > > >> On 01.05.2011 04:13, Ray Kohler wrot

Re: [arch-general] pacman: -Rd remove with no dependency check changed?

2011-05-01 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
Marek Otahal wrote: > On Sunday 01 of May 2011 00:36:40 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> Marek Otahal wrote: >> > Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to >> > mention the -dd then I read the text carefully.. > >> Don't bother, its already changed in git. > Is it? I was check

Re: [arch-general] Status of dcron

2011-05-01 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sun, 1 May 2011 03:33:37 -0400, Jim Pryor wrote: > ... > As I said, my source tree contains a large refactoring push. I have > deferred this, and back-ported some important bugfixes, and a few simple > features or packaging changes, to a v4.5 release. I'll push this to >

Re: [arch-general] Why are financial contributions not accepted?

2011-05-01 Thread Thomas S Hatch
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote: > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > > > On 01/05/11 15:35, Johannes Held wrote: > > > >> On 01.05.2011 04:13, Ray Kohler wrote: > >> > >>> I also have donated in the past, and would do so again if it were made > >>> possible.

Re: [arch-general] Why are financial contributions not accepted?

2011-05-01 Thread Kaiting Chen
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 01/05/11 15:35, Johannes Held wrote: > >> On 01.05.2011 04:13, Ray Kohler wrote: >> >>> I also have donated in the past, and would do so again if it were made >>> possible. >>> >> What about a normal bank transfer to one of Arch's core maint

Re: [arch-general] Why are financial contributions not accepted?

2011-05-01 Thread Kaiting Chen
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:30 AM, David Campbell wrote: > Excerpts from Ray Kohler's message of 2011-04-30 22:13:24 -0400: > > The donations were done via PayPal and those in charge decided PayPal > > wasn't trustworthy for use by non-profit organizations who don't have > > official government non-p

Re: [arch-general] pacman: -Rd remove with no dependency check changed?

2011-05-01 Thread Kaiting Chen
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Marek Otahal wrote: > On Sunday 01 of May 2011 00:36:40 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > > Marek Otahal wrote: > > > Oh, thank you very much Jesse! I already started writing a patch to > > > mention the -dd then I read the text carefully.. > > > > Don't bother, its alre

Re: [arch-general] Why are financial contributions not accepted?

2011-05-01 Thread David Campbell
Excerpts from Ray Kohler's message of 2011-04-30 22:13:24 -0400: > The donations were done via PayPal and those in charge decided PayPal > wasn't trustworthy for use by non-profit organizations who don't have > official government non-profit status. Have the leadership of Arch considered applying

[arch-general] Status of dcron

2011-05-01 Thread Jim Pryor
Hi I'm the upstream developer of dcron (and an Arch user). As some of you know, I haven't been able to tend to this project much for the past year. Part of the trouble was I was in the middle of a large refactoring project when other responsibilities dragged me away, and I was never able to make en