Re: [arch-general] Hello

2011-05-05 Thread Thomas S Hatch
> > > Since we're in an educational mood ... > http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html > especially: http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html#ss2.1 & > http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html#ss2.2 > > > Greg > See? I still make a mess of things sometimes :) -Thomas

Re: [arch-general] Hello

2011-05-05 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Brandon Jones wrote: > >> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: >> >> > Awesome! Also, bottom post, some people around here will get annoyed :) >> > >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style >> > http://www.caliburn.nl/t

Re: [arch-general] Hello

2011-05-05 Thread Thomas S Hatch
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Brandon Jones wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Brandon Jones > >wrote: > > > > > I think I'll start with the AUR. I could use the packaging experience > > > anyway. Plus it will force me to get

Re: [arch-general] Hello

2011-05-05 Thread Brandon Jones
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Brandon Jones >wrote: > > > I think I'll start with the AUR. I could use the packaging experience > > anyway. Plus it will force me to get to know my commands and the nuts > and > > bolts of the system more

Re: [arch-general] Hello

2011-05-05 Thread Thomas S Hatch
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Brandon Jones wrote: > I think I'll start with the AUR. I could use the packaging experience > anyway. Plus it will force me to get to know my commands and the nuts and > bolts of the system more. I'll definately check out the projects though > once I feel skille

Re: [arch-general] Hello

2011-05-05 Thread Brandon Jones
I think I'll start with the AUR. I could use the packaging experience anyway. Plus it will force me to get to know my commands and the nuts and bolts of the system more. I'll definately check out the projects though once I feel skilled enough to do so. On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Thomas S H

Re: [arch-general] Hello

2011-05-05 Thread Thomas S Hatch
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Brandon Jones wrote: > Alright thanks. I'll look into how pkgbuild works and see if I can figure > it out to maintain some packages. Better to update the packages to they > are > available then just delete them. > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haa

Re: [arch-general] Hello

2011-05-05 Thread Brandon Jones
Alright thanks. I'll look into how pkgbuild works and see if I can figure it out to maintain some packages. Better to update the packages to they are available then just delete them. On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > On 05/05/2011 10:49 PM, Brandon Jones wrote: > >> H

Re: [arch-general] Hello

2011-05-05 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 05/05/2011 10:49 PM, Brandon Jones wrote: Hey all, I'm new to arch linux but I would like to contribute in anyway I can. My development skills are limited to java and c#, however I am willing to learn c/c++ and others to help you all out. Just let me know what I can do to be of assistance.

[arch-general] Hello

2011-05-05 Thread Brandon Jones
Hey all, I'm new to arch linux but I would like to contribute in anyway I can. My development skills are limited to java and c#, however I am willing to learn c/c++ and others to help you all out. Just let me know what I can do to be of assistance.

Re: [arch-general] nautilus 3 update - pacman error

2011-05-05 Thread Ionut Biru
On 05/05/2011 09:38 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: guys, I think the nautilus INSTALL file has a problem. The latest update resulted in: (3/3) upgrading nautilus [###] 100% /tmp/alpm_1J0ybD/.INSTALL: line 4: gtk-update-icon-cache: command not found can you st

Re: [arch-general] nautilus 3 update - pacman error

2011-05-05 Thread Auguste Pop
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:38 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > guys, > >  I think the nautilus INSTALL file has a problem. The latest update resulted > in: > > (3/3) upgrading nautilus [###] 100% > /tmp/alpm_1J0ybD/.INSTALL: line 4: gtk-update-icon-cache: command not

[arch-general] nautilus 3 update - pacman error

2011-05-05 Thread David C. Rankin
guys, I think the nautilus INSTALL file has a problem. The latest update resulted in: (3/3) upgrading nautilus [###] 100% /tmp/alpm_1J0ybD/.INSTALL: line 4: gtk-update-icon-cache: command not found -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38.5-1

2011-05-05 Thread David C. Rankin
On 05/03/2011 06:58 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi, bump to latest version. Please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa signoff 5 i686, 4 x86_64 + 4 virtualbox installs (i686 & x86_64). All working well, even the flaky MSI box and the virtualbox shared folders... -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38.5-1

2011-05-05 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Excerpts from Tobias Powalowski's message from Tue 03-May-11 13:58: > bump to latest version. > Please signoff both arches, I know it's already in core, just want to let know that X terminals are still unusable - do not refresh properly - with Intel GM965 (ThinkPad R61). Last time several people

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3, a bug?

2011-05-05 Thread Casey Peter
On 05/05/2011 03:30 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:25, Casey Peter wrote: On 05/05/2011 03:20 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 09:17, Casey Peterwrote: On 05/05/2011 01:43 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 07:38, Casey Peter wro

Re: [arch-general] Pruning the bugtracker

2011-05-05 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 05/04/2011 09:35 PM, JM wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: JM wrote: I have browsed through all High and Medium severity bugreports and categorized some of them here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Fijam . 'Candidates for closing' are divided into

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3, a bug?

2011-05-05 Thread Magnus Therning
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:25, Casey Peter wrote: > On 05/05/2011 03:20 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 09:17, Casey Peter  wrote: >>> >>> On 05/05/2011 01:43 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 07:38, Casey Peter    wrote: > > On 05/04/2011 1

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3, a bug?

2011-05-05 Thread Casey Peter
On 05/05/2011 03:20 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 09:17, Casey Peter wrote: On 05/05/2011 01:43 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 07:38, Casey Peterwrote: On 05/04/2011 11:56 PM, Magnus Therning wrote: On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 17:54, Damien Churchill w

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3, a bug?

2011-05-05 Thread Magnus Therning
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 09:17, Casey Peter wrote: > On 05/05/2011 01:43 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 07:38, Casey Peter  wrote: >>> >>> On 05/04/2011 11:56 PM, Magnus Therning wrote: On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 17:54, Damien Churchill  wrote: > > You can

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3, a bug?

2011-05-05 Thread Casey Peter
On 05/05/2011 01:43 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 07:38, Casey Peter wrote: On 05/04/2011 11:56 PM, Magnus Therning wrote: On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 17:54, Damien Churchillwrote: You can disable extensions, taken from the Gnome Shell extensions page [1] "Per-user and sys

Re: [arch-general] Gnome 3, a bug?

2011-05-05 Thread Magnus Therning
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 07:38, Casey Peter wrote: > On 05/04/2011 11:56 PM, Magnus Therning wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 17:54, Damien Churchill  wrote: >>> >>> You can disable extensions, taken from the Gnome Shell extensions page >>> [1] >>> >>> "Per-user and systemwide extensions can be d