On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
snip
rc.conf - MODULES(!mod1, !mod2): blacklisting modules in the modules
array will no longer have any effect. modprobe already provides two
different ways of preventing modules from being loaded, so this is
just a matter of
You are right Kerry, I just had my kde configuration corrupted.
Thanks!
2011/5/28 Kerrick Staley m...@kerrickstaley.com:
Álvaro,
Try this: log out of your KDE session, then execute mv ~/.kde4 ~/.kde4_old
from a terminal, and then log back in to KDE. Check to see if the issue
persists. If the
Thanks for your Oon-ee.
Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
snip
rc.conf - MODULES(!mod1, !mod2): blacklisting modules in the modules
array will no longer have any effect. modprobe already
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Thanks for your Oon-ee.
Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
snip
rc.conf - MODULES(!mod1, !mod2): blacklisting modules in
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Thanks for your Oon-ee.
Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Tom Gundersen
On 05/29/2011 04:32 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Oon-Ee Ngngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Tom Gundersent...@jklm.no wrote:
Thanks for your Oon-ee.
Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Oon-Ee Ngngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 28,
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
Thanks for your Oon-ee.
Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Oon-Ee Ng
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
I have not found any uses of the MODULES array like you describe (if
they exist they should be considered bugs though, the MODULES array
was not meant to be used in this way). However, if anyone knows of
any, then please let me
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Casey Peter casey...@gmail.com wrote:
Also !usblp for those of us with USB printer issues. (especially HP usb
inkjets)
Yup, blacklist it in /etc/modprobe.d (we should probably fix this once
and for all, I believe other distro's simply removed this module, but
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Auguste Pop augu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
I have not found any uses of the MODULES array like you describe (if
they exist they should be considered bugs though, the MODULES array
was not meant to be
On 05/29/2011 04:52 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Casey Petercasey...@gmail.com wrote:
Also !usblp for those of us with USB printer issues. (especially HP usb
inkjets)
Yup, blacklist it in /etc/modprobe.d (we should probably fix this once
and for all, I believe
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
No. I was saying that only load-modules.sh/initscripts should parse
the MODULES array directly (Oon-ee was suggesting that udev rules
might rely on the MODULES array).
Once we make this change, then blacklisting in rc.conf
Am 29.05.2011 12:52, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Casey Petercasey...@gmail.com wrote:
Also !usblp for those of us with USB printer issues. (especially HP usb
inkjets)
Yup, blacklist it in /etc/modprobe.d (we should probably fix this once
and for all, I believe
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Richard Schütz r.sc...@t-online.de wrote:
ood idea, as some applications still need it. For example escputil, which is
shipped with gutenprint, needs usblp to read the ink levels from some EPSON
printers. So only blacklisting it by default seems to be the better
I recently did a fresh install and noticed a ton of modules prefixed with !
in rc.conf by default. Not at the box currently but it was 5-7 modules
listed. This will have to be changed.
Also, this functionality has worked the same way for the entire time that
I've used Arch. That is since 2003
On 29 May 2011 15:53, Robert Howard howard@gmail.com wrote:
I recently did a fresh install and noticed a ton of modules prefixed with !
in rc.conf by default. Not at the box currently but it was 5-7 modules
listed. This will have to be changed.
Also, this functionality has worked the
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Robert Howard howard@gmail.com wrote:
I recently did a fresh install and noticed a ton of modules prefixed with !
in rc.conf by default. Not at the box currently but it was 5-7 modules
listed. This will have to be changed.
This is not in the initscripts
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Meyithi m...@meyithi.com wrote:
If that happened then you used the Archboot install media with it's hwdetect
consistent device ordering option. Archboot isn't official install media
and I suspect that feature will have to be reworked because of the udev
Same here with syslinux vesamenu, intel gma965.
On Sunday 29 of May 2011 13:56:15 Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Auguste Pop augu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
I have not found any uses of the MODULES array like you describe (if
they exist they should be
2011/5/29 Vytautas Stankevičius brothe...@gmail.com:
I seem to remember that the point of rc.conf was to configure system in one
place. Looks like the politics are changing.
rc.conf is the one place for all Arch-specific settings. As you know
/etc is full of config files owned by different
No problem. Corruption of the KDE configuration happens frequently on my
system; I haven't yet bothered to find out why, though. I usually prefer
Kerrick, not Kerry, by the way.
-Kerrick Staley
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Álvaro Villalba Navarro
vn.alv...@gmail.com wrote:
You are right
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
2011/5/29 Vytautas Stankevičius brothe...@gmail.com:
I seem to remember that the point of rc.conf was to configure system in one
place. Looks like the politics are changing.
rc.conf is the one place for all Arch-specific
The next kernel version will be 3.0
Any decision now?
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Kwpolska kwpol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:57:23PM +0200, Marek Otahal wrote:
100% agreed! although i think this thread is pointless,
imagine google search for broken wifi:
gg linux
24 matches
Mail list logo
