If true, you might want to consider mentioning that it might be
unnecessary to blacklist certain modules such as 'pcspkr' which are no
longer automatically loaded (since load_modules.sh has been removed)
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> Just one officially supported? How about boxes with 2 nics acting as
> routers or gateways? It sounds to me a bit limited... netcfg is
> there but it's not the default,
We hope netcfg will become the preferred networking solution in the
f
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 18:29, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>> ...
>> I've looked at the examples for netcfg, the netcfg article on the
>> wiki, and the man page and
>> I'm apparently missing something. The example for a wired config shows
>> a single DNS
>> server entry. Does netcfg support multiple DNS
...
>>
>> The new syntax is very simplistic and only supports one wired network
>> device (configured statically or by dhcp) and we do not expect to add
>> more features in the future. We want to encourage the use of more
>> advanced network solutions, such as `networkmanager` or our own
>> `netcfg
> ...
> I've looked at the examples for netcfg, the netcfg article on the
> wiki, and the man page and
> I'm apparently missing something. The example for a wired config shows
> a single DNS
> server entry. Does netcfg support multiple DNS server entrys?
>
> Myra
>
Like the following?
DNS=('200.9
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 17:46, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On 7 June 2011 21:49, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Evangelos Foutras
>> wrote:
>>> This should be moved to [core] quickly.
>>>
>>> If you try to create a testing chroot, it will proceed to install the
>>> 'base'
On Tuesday 07 of June 2011 23:47:35 Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Marek Otahal wrote:
> > Since net-tools are going to be abandoned (I was wondering how i
> > "misuninstalled" the package), what do i use as an alternative to ifconfig?
> > I use wicd or ma
Hi Marek,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Marek Otahal wrote:
> Since net-tools are going to be abandoned (I was wondering how i
> "misuninstalled" the package), what do i use as an alternative to ifconfig? I
> use wicd or manually bring LAN up, and it occurred to me network interfaces
> fail
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 14:36, Marek Otahal wrote:
> Hello Tom,
> thanks for the pre-announcement, looks good. I have just a question..
> Since net-tools are going to be abandoned (I was wondering how i
> "misuninstalled" the package), what do i use as an alternative to ifconfig? I
> use wicd or
Hello Tom,
thanks for the pre-announcement, looks good. I have just a question..
Since net-tools are going to be abandoned (I was wondering how i
"misuninstalled" the package), what do i use as an alternative to ifconfig? I
use wicd or manually bring LAN up, and it occurred to me network interfa
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 14:02 +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Dienstag 07 Juni 2011 schrieb Mark Foxwell:
> > # sending to arch-general as I can't post to arch-dev-public
> >
> > Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > > - lirc does not compile, anyone who uses lirc might take a look at it
> > >
> > >
On 06/07/2011 07:58 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
I bumped it to the latest kernel version,
What is missing for signoff the .39 series:
- Still no aufs2 support
Can we finally drop it? What's the status of latest archiso scripts?
archboot is not affected by this.
Work in progress,
Am Dienstag 07 Juni 2011 schrieb Mark Foxwell:
> # sending to arch-general as I can't post to arch-dev-public
>
> Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > - lirc does not compile, anyone who uses lirc might take a look at it
> >
> > We have no maintainer listed, this time no commits on their git
> > happ
# sending to arch-general as I can't post to arch-dev-public
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> - lirc does not compile, anyone who uses lirc might take a look at it
> We have no maintainer listed, this time no commits on their git
> happened lately to fix compile errors.
I created lirc-utils-git [1]
Upstream update. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.39 currently
resides there), but at:
http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/kernel26/
please signoff for both arches.
changes:
- added ftracers
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24404
- added batman feature
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24373
- re
Latest LTS kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches
- synced with .39 config and enabled the ftracers
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24404
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature
16 matches
Mail list logo
