[arch-general] Xorg not working on AMD C-50 Fusion (Radeon HD 6250)

2011-07-10 Thread Nicolás Adamo
Hi all! I'm having trouble installing xorg on a Gateway Netbook which has a fusion AMD processor model C-50. It has micro+graphics in one chip. I've googled that many people succeded with catalyst drivers, though I haven't been that lucky. I added the [catalyst] repo mentioned at the arch

Re: [arch-general] Xorg not working on AMD C-50 Fusion (Radeon HD 6250)

2011-07-10 Thread jesse jaara
Make sure you disable kms. Add 'nokms' kernel boot line

Re: [arch-general] Xorg not working on AMD C-50 Fusion (Radeon HD 6250)

2011-07-10 Thread Bogdan Ionuț
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:33, jesse jaara jesse.ja...@gmail.com wrote: nokms not nomodeset!?

Re: [arch-general] Xorg not working on AMD C-50 Fusion (Radeon HD 6250)

2011-07-10 Thread jesse jaara
10.7.2011 11.35 Bogdan Ionuț bog...@punctweb.ro kirjoitti: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:33, jesse jaara jesse.ja...@gmail.com wrote: nokms not nomodeset!? Oh sorry I did mean nomodeset. No wonder nokms looked like it was way too short. Also I assume you have loaded the fglrx module. Try to

[arch-general] About a modprobe command before /etc/rc.sysinit

2011-07-10 Thread F.Gr.
Hi, during boot process, I'm getting the following (it seems there's a problem with some modprobe command) before the script '/etc/rc.sysinit' is run: --- Usage: /sbin/modprobe [-v] [-V] [-C config-file] [-d dirname ] [-n] (cut) --- I'm running the latest kernel version 2.6.39.3-1 on x86_64. --

Re: [arch-general] About a modprobe command before /etc/rc.sysinit

2011-07-10 Thread jesse jaara
--- Usage: /sbin/modprobe [-v] [-V] [-C config-file] [-d dirname ] [-n] (cut) --- I get that too. Im using systemd -- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. ( ) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.)

Re: [arch-general] About a modprobe command before /etc/rc.sysinit

2011-07-10 Thread Florian Pritz
On 10.07.2011 12:18, F.Gr. wrote: Hi, during boot process, I'm getting the following (it seems there's a problem with some modprobe command) before the script '/etc/rc.sysinit' is run: --- Usage: /sbin/modprobe [-v] [-V] [-C config-file] [-d dirname ] [-n] (cut) --- I'm running the

[arch-general] grub-legacy-fedora-git package

2011-07-10 Thread KESHAV P.R.
Hi all, I have created a PKGBUILD for Fedora's GRUB Legacy fork, grub-legacy-fedora-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47959 . It includes support for GPT boot (not tested) and supports ext4 /boot (tested using the UEFI package). It does not include any of the patches used in

[arch-general] iptables not working well?

2011-07-10 Thread Javier Vasquez
Hi, I've configured a 2-nics gateway (one internal nic and an external usb nic hooked to the adsl modem).  I configured iptables as I'm used to do: ++ iptables-restore /etc/iptables/empty.rules iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT iptables -F

Re: [arch-general] Xorg not working on AMD C-50 Fusion (Radeon HD 6250)

2011-07-10 Thread Nicolás Adamo
First of all, Thanks for so much reply! nomodeset was already in menu.lst wat wasn't there is fglrx in modules array @t rc.conf , but on other desktop machine it isn't necessary. The wiki page doesn't ask for it when using the repo [catalyst] Either way I'll try adding it and I'll tell you guys

[arch-general] Nvidia?? (About to do pacman -Syu but:)

2011-07-10 Thread Joe(theWordy)Philbrook
In preparation for a pacman -Syu I peeked at the main page and read: The nvidia-173xx and nvidia-96xx driver packages have been removed from our repositories as they are incompatible with newer xorg servers. This can only be fixed by an upstream update, which has not happened yet. For most

Re: [arch-general] Nvidia?? (About to do pacman -Syu but:)

2011-07-10 Thread Vic Demuzere
On 07/10/2011 07:22 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: according to pacman -Q nvidia I got: nvidia 270.41.19-1 Should I worry about it? That is should I find out how to prevent pacman from messing with the video driver, or does the 270.41.19-1 mean the above will have no effect on my nvidia

Re: [arch-general] Nvidia?? (About to do pacman -Syu but:)

2011-07-10 Thread Vic Demuzere
On 07/10/2011 07:25 PM, Vic Demuzere wrote: On 07/10/2011 07:22 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: according to pacman -Q nvidia I got: nvidia 270.41.19-1 Should I worry about it? That is should I find out how to prevent pacman from messing with the video driver, or does the 270.41.19-1

Re: [arch-general] Xorg not working on AMD C-50 Fusion (Radeon HD 6250)

2011-07-10 Thread Nicolás Adamo
On 07/10/2011 02:18 PM, Nicolás Adamo wrote: First of all, Thanks for so much reply! nomodeset was already in menu.lst wat wasn't there is fglrx in modules array @t rc.conf , but on other desktop machine it isn't necessary. The wiki page doesn't ask for it when using the repo [catalyst] Either

Re: [arch-general] Xorg not working on AMD C-50 Fusion (Radeon HD 6250)

2011-07-10 Thread jesse jaara
2011/7/10 Nicolás Adamo nicoad...@gmail.com On 07/10/2011 02:18 PM, Nicolás Adamo wrote: First of all, Thanks for so much reply! nomodeset was already in menu.lst wat wasn't there is fglrx in modules array @t rc.conf , but on other desktop machine it isn't necessary. The wiki page doesn't

Re: [arch-general] Xorg not working on AMD C-50 Fusion (Radeon HD 6250)

2011-07-10 Thread Nicolás Adamo
On 07/10/2011 03:40 PM, jesse jaara wrote: 2011/7/10 Nicolás Adamonicoad...@gmail.com On 07/10/2011 02:18 PM, Nicolás Adamo wrote: First of all, Thanks for so much reply! nomodeset was already in menu.lst wat wasn't there is fglrx in modules array @t rc.conf , but on other desktop machine it

Re: [arch-general] iptables not working well?

2011-07-10 Thread Javier Vasquez
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Dr. Robert Marmorstein rob...@narnia.homeunix.com wrote: If you have a static IP address on your ethernet card, you probably want to use SNAT rather than MASQUERADE. Also, I find it odd that you are using MASQUERADE on traffic TO the ppp0 interface.  Usually,

Re: [arch-general] iptables not working well?

2011-07-10 Thread Damjan Georgievski
If you have a static IP address on your ethernet card, you probably want to use SNAT rather than MASQUERADE. Also, I find it odd that you are using MASQUERADE on traffic TO the ppp0 interface.  Usually, ou MASQUERADE traffic FROM the ppp0 address.  You might try -i instead of -o in that

Re: [arch-general] iptables not working well?

2011-07-10 Thread Damjan Georgievski
Your config looks ok, but to double check, paste the output of: iptables -L -nv iptables -t nat -L -nv to see the exact situation. OK, on machines at the internal side of my LAN, I can ping everywhere.  But I can not use the browser with all addresses, for example I can't get to

[arch-general] howto properly disable sound device pulse/alsa?

2011-07-10 Thread Matthew Monaco
I think since Gnome 3 / pulseaudio, I've had an annoying system beep when shutting down. The pcspkr module is not loaded. I've found that I have the following device: $ dmesg | grep Beep [ 10.594164] input: HDA Digital PCBeep as /devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/input/input7 And that the

Re: [arch-general] howto properly disable sound device pulse/alsa?

2011-07-10 Thread jesse jaara
Just enable the alsa daemon in rc.conf so that sound levels get reloaded on boot according to what they were at shutdown time. ^^

Re: [arch-general] howto properly disable sound device pulse/alsa?

2011-07-10 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 07/10/2011 08:50 PM, jesse jaara wrote: Just enable the alsa daemon in rc.conf so that sound levels get reloaded on boot according to what they were at shutdown time. ^^ Yeah, I know about this, but is there a way to just put it in a config file without the alsa-utils package?

Re: [arch-general] howto properly disable sound device pulse/alsa?

2011-07-10 Thread dmbuce
On 07/10/2011 07:44 PM, Matthew Monaco wrote: I think since Gnome 3 / pulseaudio, I've had an annoying system beep when shutting down. The pcspkr module is not loaded. Are you blacklisting this module through the old syntax in rc.conf? The configuration for blacklisting modules changed not