On 7 August 2011 11:43, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
>ArchWiki is an excellent source, yet we needed simplifications.
Great effort, but I feel this effort could've been directed to the
wiki itself to "simplify" its contents.
I guess now it could be linked from the beginner's guide somewhere.
--
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 7:41 AM, R7h0re4 wrote:
> Madhurya Kakati writes:
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Canon has terrible linux support. I have a canon LBP2900B laser
>> printer and haven't been able to print using there official CAPT
>> driver. Its something related to pstocapt files. CUPS is unable to
>> commu
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 4:11 AM, R7h0re4 wrote:
>
>> That would make sense It does work under Debian 32 so I could always
>> plug in my netbook if I needed something to print. As it stands I am
>> using a print server which hooks to a windows
--
Regards
Shridhar--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
As we started publishing manuals on Muktware a few months ago. We just
published a detailed Arch Linux manual. The manual is targetted at those
users who want to try it but fail to do due to lack of easy manuals.
ArchWiki is an excellent source,
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 4:11 AM, R7h0re4 wrote:
> That would make sense It does work under Debian 32 so I could always
> plug in my netbook if I needed something to print. As it stands I am
> using a print server which hooks to a windows gaming machine. I might
> print like once or twice a month
Madhurya Kakati writes:
>>
>>
>
> Canon has terrible linux support. I have a canon LBP2900B laser
> printer and haven't been able to print using there official CAPT
> driver. Its something related to pstocapt files. CUPS is unable to
> communicate properly with the CAPT daemon which sends commands
[2011-08-06 17:58:53 +0200] Thomas Bächler:
> Upstream changes:
> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
>
> Arch Linux Changes:
> - Rename the package: kernel26 -> linux
> - Added necessary replaces=(...)
> - Removed old comments and vercmps from .install file
> - Removed old comments and replaces
Am 06.08.2011 19:52, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
>
> Signoff x86_64.
>
> "dmesg -k -l err" is empty, and the only mildly interesting output of
> "dmesg -k -l warn" I get is:
>
> [7.26
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
Signoff x86_64.
"dmesg -k -l err" is empty, and the only mildly interesting output of
"dmesg -k -l warn" I get is:
[7.268214] ACPI: Deprecated procfs I/F for AC is loaded, please
re
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 6:07 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Meyithi wrote:
It appears that the quiet kernel parameter also sets a quiet flag i
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 11:32, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 06.08.2011 18:27, schrieb Myra Nelson:
>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:58, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
>>>
>>> Note: the upgrade path from 3.0-2 to 3.0.1-1 is not entirely smo
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
Signoff both.
Am 06.08.2011 18:27, schrieb Myra Nelson:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:58, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
>>
>> Note: the upgrade path from 3.0-2 to 3.0.1-1 is not entirely smooth if
>> you rely on the vmlinuz26 compat symlink. However, t
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:58, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
>
> Note: the upgrade path from 3.0-2 to 3.0.1-1 is not entirely smooth if
> you rely on the vmlinuz26 compat symlink. However, the upgrade path from
> core/kernel26 to this versio
Am Sat, 06 Aug 2011 11:07:17 +0200
schrieb Thomas Bächler :
> What would be the point?
Well, nothing. I have to admit that I made a small error in reasoning.
I just didn't thought about the change of the package name. ;-)
Heiko
Hi,
please signoff the 3.0 series for both architectures.
Note: the upgrade path from 3.0-2 to 3.0.1-1 is not entirely smooth if
you rely on the vmlinuz26 compat symlink. However, the upgrade path from
core/kernel26 to this version is smooth.
Upstream changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChang
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Bernardo Barros
wrote:
> If they have just this kernel, how they will boot the machine in order
> to fix it?
>
They can just edit the boot menu entry (Press `e' in the case of GRUB).
There're also Live CDs to rescue unbootable systems.
Thomas +1
If they have just this kernel, how they will boot the machine in order
to fix it?
On 08/06/2011 12:19 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
If you want it to be KISS, let's not provide any backward compatibility
and add an install message telling people to change their bootloader.
Excellent idea. ;)
Users are expected to read pacman's output anyway (or suffer the
consequences).
--
ca
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 6:07 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Meyithi wrote:
>>> It appears that the quiet kernel parameter also sets a quiet flag in
>>> Syslinux as well, which is doing something horrible t
Am 05.08.2011 22:23, schrieb Heiko Baums:
> Am Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:54:07 +0200
> schrieb Thomas Bächler :
>
>> 3) As it is now, new installations will end up with compat symlinks.
>> This is only supposed to be for updates, not for new installations.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to put it to post_up
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:02, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Karol Blazewicz
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Madhurya Kakati
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I ran pacman -Syu and now I am seeing more info than shown before
> >> during boot. VERBOSE is set to 3 in r
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Karol Blazewicz
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Madhurya Kakati
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I ran pacman -Syu and now I am seeing more info than shown before
>>> during boot. VERBOSE is set to 3 in rc
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I ran pacman -Syu and now I am seeing more info than shown before
>> during boot. VERBOSE is set to 3 in rc.conf. Whats happening? Any
>> changes to boot process?
>> Thanks
>>
24 matches
Mail list logo
