What is the proper procedure for updating libgsf. Per the commit message
libgnome-gsf was dropped because upstream dropped it. When trying to update
the following error occurs.
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) ::
libgsf-gnome: requires libgsf=1.14.21.
I realiz
On 17/12/11 23:07, Ethan Schoonover wrote:
> There was a recent Arch-Haskell thread about dumping most of AUR
> Haskell packages:
> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/2011-November/001744.html
>
> As an end user, I effectively ignore the official Arch Haskell
> packages as they are so f
On 12/18/2011 10:31 AM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> What is the proper procedure for updating libgsf. Per the commit message
> libgnome-gsf was dropped because upstream dropped it. When trying to update
> the following error occurs.
>
> error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies
glibc-2.14.1-3 broke time display for me.
It displays UTC regardless of /etc/localtime or TZ environment variable.
Downgrading fixed it again.
# date
Sun Dec 18 09:35:36 UTC 2011
# ls -l /etc/localtime
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 Dec 1 20:02 /etc/localtime ->
/usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Brussels
On 12/18/2011 09:40 AM, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> glibc-2.14.1-3 broke time display for me.
>
> It displays UTC regardless of /etc/localtime or TZ environment variable.
>
> Downgrading fixed it again.
>
> # date
> Sun Dec 18 09:35:36 UTC 2011
> # ls -l /etc/localtime
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 Dec
On 18/12/11 19:44, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 12/18/2011 09:40 AM, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
>> glibc-2.14.1-3 broke time display for me.
>>
>> It displays UTC regardless of /etc/localtime or TZ environment variable.
>>
>> Downgrading fixed it again.
>>
>> # date
>> Sun Dec 18 09:35:36 UTC 2011
>>
On 18/12/11 09:53, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 17/12/11 23:07, Ethan Schoonover wrote:
>> There was a recent Arch-Haskell thread about dumping most of AUR
>> Haskell packages:
>> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/2011-November/001744.html
>>
>> As an end user, I effectively ignore the
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:31:09AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
[...]
>
> Btw adopted xmonad,xmonad-contrib, these packages will be updated today.
Excellent, then I can stop building these for myself. Are you
considering adding xmonad-extras too, or should I go ahead and add
that to [haskell]
On 18/12/11 11:48, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:31:09AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Btw adopted xmonad,xmonad-contrib, these packages will be updated today.
>
> Excellent, then I can stop building these for myself. Are you
> considering adding xmonad-extra
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 09:53:40AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
[...]
> What are the real troubling haskell packages? Only GHC,
> haskell-platform and XMonad?
I'm not sure any of them are troubling. This is my view on it:
- GHC is a big package, but Vesa is doing a good job keeping it
up-to
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:53:29AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 18/12/11 11:48, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:31:09AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > [...]
> >>
> >> Btw adopted xmonad,xmonad-contrib, these packages will be updated today.
> >
> > Excellent, then
On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 01:10 -0300, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
> When I play a video with mplayer2 (also happens with tvtime)
>
> MPlayer2 2.0-379-ge3f5043 (C) 2000-2011 MPlayer Team
> 162 audio & 361 video codecs
>
> I get the following display problem on screen 2
Linux isn't the best
PPS: There was a request at Ubuntu Studio users list what to use as the
default video player.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/2011-December/008049.html
Suggested was TOTEM, some preferred VLC, nobody was thinking of
MPlayer ;).
On 18-12-2011 11:40, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 01:10 -0300, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
>> When I play a video with mplayer2 (also happens with tvtime)
>>
>> MPlayer2 2.0-379-ge3f5043 (C) 2000-2011 MPlayer Team
>> 162 audio & 361 video codecs
>>
>> I get the following disp
On 18/12/11 13:23, Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 18-12-2011 11:40, Ralf Madorf wrote:
>> On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 01:10 -0300, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
>>> When I play a video with mplayer2 (also happens with tvtime)
>>>
>>> MPlayer2 2.0-379-ge3f5043 (C) 2000-2011 MPlayer Team
>>> 162 audio & 3
On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 12:23 +, Mauro Santos wrote:
> Come again? VLC and mplayer have always been able to happily play
> everything I've thrown at them while many windows players crap
> themselves out because they either don't know how to handle the
> container, video or audio.
I don't have ex
El 18/12/11 08:40, Ralf Madorf escribió:
On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 01:10 -0300, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
When I play a video with mplayer2 (also happens with tvtime)
MPlayer2 2.0-379-ge3f5043 (C) 2000-2011 MPlayer Team
162 audio& 361 video codecs
I get the following display problem on
Did you try with differend backends? xv/gl/(vdpau)
On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 09:41 -0300, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
> El 18/12/11 08:40, Ralf Madorf escribió:
> > On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 01:10 -0300, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
> >> When I play a video with mplayer2 (also happens with tvtime)
> >>
> >> MPlayer2 2.0-379-ge3f5043 (C) 20
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 20:02:38 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Have reproduced and fixed. Will be uploading a new package in the next
> hour or so.
Fix confirmed, glibc-2.14.1-4 works for me.
Thanks,
Geert
--
geert.hendrickx.be :: ge...@hendrickx.be :: PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was
On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 14:56 +0200, Jesse Jaara wrote:
> Did you try with differend backends? xv/gl/(vdpau)
Again, I agree, backends for what ever! Interpretation of the codecs
might be important too. Dunno, but I guess Jesse refers to some X
related thingies. I experienced differences using those
On 18/12/11 14:05, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 14:56 +0200, Jesse Jaara wrote:
>> Did you try with differend backends? xv/gl/(vdpau)
>
> Again, I agree, backends for what ever! Interpretation of the codecs
> might be important too. Dunno, but I guess Jesse refers to some X
> related
El 18/12/11 09:56, Jesse Jaara escribió:
Did you try with differend backends? xv/gl/(vdpau)
Thanks,
Results:
Same problem with: xv, sdl
No issues with: gl, x11, gl_nosw, gl_sdl
Tested with mplayer2
Now I am figuring out how to change the video output driver with tvtime
(I have a bttv compa
On 18-12-2011 04:10, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
> When I play a video with mplayer2 (also happens with tvtime)
>
> MPlayer2 2.0-379-ge3f5043 (C) 2000-2011 MPlayer Team
> 162 audio & 361 video codecs
Can you give mplayer (just mplayer, not mplayer2) a try? I've had
problems with mplayer2
On 18-12-2011 14:15, Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 18-12-2011 04:10, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
>> When I play a video with mplayer2 (also happens with tvtime)
>>
>> MPlayer2 2.0-379-ge3f5043 (C) 2000-2011 MPlayer Team
>> 162 audio & 361 video codecs
>
> Can you give mplayer (just mplayer, no
Magnus Therning [2011.12.18 1148 +0100]:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:31:09AM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > Btw adopted xmonad,xmonad-contrib, these packages will be updated today.
>
> Excellent, then I can stop building these for myself. Are you
> considering adding xmonad-ext
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 09:01, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 12/18/2011 10:31 AM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> > What is the proper procedure for updating libgsf. Per the commit message
> > libgnome-gsf was dropped because upstream dropped it. When trying to
> update
> > the following error occurs.
> >
> > erro
On 12/18/2011 07:04 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>> I realize I can complete the update by pacman -Suf or pacman -Rdd
>>> libgsf-gnome then install the libgsf update but would think this would be
>>> handled by an install file included with the package. I would prefer not
>> to
>>> bork my box so I thou
Dear Archers,
I've had a working Xmonad installation since May, I start it via GDM and
"/usr/share/xsessions/xmonad.desktop" as described in Arch wiki.
However, since the latest "pacman -Syu" GDM just tells me it was unable
to start the Xmonad session. I've issued "xmonad --recompile" several
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 17:39, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 12/18/2011 07:04 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> >>> I realize I can complete the update by pacman -Suf or pacman -Rdd
> >>> libgsf-gnome then install the libgsf update but would think this would
> be
> >>> handled by an install file included with th
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 18:46, Myra Nelson wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 17:39, Ionut Biru wrote:
>
>> On 12/18/2011 07:04 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
>> >>> I realize I can complete the update by pacman -Suf or pacman -Rdd
>> >>> libgsf-gnome then install the libgsf update but would think thi
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 07:08:50PM +0100, Mathias Huber wrote:
> However, since the latest "pacman -Syu" GDM just tells me it was
> unable to start the Xmonad session. I've issued "xmonad --recompile"
> several times, which didn't help. "~/.xmonad/xmonad.errors" is brand
> new, but empty.
I've -Sy
On 12/16/2011 10:40 PM, Alex Liu wrote:
> First, have you tried the generic broadcom-wl driver instead of
> ndiswrapper?
> Tell me if anything of this works for you.
Alex,
Thanks, will do. The current xp drivers work fantastic, so I will try the
ndiswrapper avenue first. If I can get that go
Am 18.12.2011 20:01, schrieb Ivan Sichmann Freitas:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 07:08:50PM +0100, Mathias Huber wrote:
However, since the latest "pacman -Syu" GDM just tells me it was
unable to start the Xmonad session. I've issued "xmonad --recompile"
several times, which didn't help. "~/.xmonad/xm
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 18:58, Myra Nelson wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 18:46, Myra Nelson wrote:
>
>>
>> Clarifying the manual might help. If you don't mind I'll take a look at
>> the man page and see if I can make the necessary changes. I also wonder
>> about adding a message similar t
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> What is the proper procedure for sending a patch for the man pages? I've
> done some work on pacman.8 to reflect some of the wiki changes. Also would
> it be acceptable to include in the man page that the -f option has been
> deprecated and sho
Just try to support Haskell Platform in extra/community. That's enough.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 21:08, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Myra Nelson
> wrote:
> > What is the proper procedure for sending a patch for the man pages? I've
> > done some work on pacman.8 to reflect some of the wiki changes. Also
> would
> > it be acceptable to inclu
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> Karol:
>
> Thanks for the link. Not quite what I was referring to.
Argh, you're right, sorry.
Let's try again ;P https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=124840
IMHO, writing "This option should be used with care, ideally not at
all" as pa
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 22:17, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Myra Nelson
> wrote:
> > Karol:
> >
> > Thanks for the link. Not quite what I was referring to.
>
> Argh, you're right, sorry.
> Let's try again ;P https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=124840
>
> IMHO,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 22:17, Karol Blazewicz
> wrote:
> Would it be better to make both sections
> read ( pacman -Sy then pacman -S package_name or pacman -Su )?
'pacman -Sy foo' or alternatively 'pacman -Sy' followed by 'pacman -S
foo' is
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 22:55, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Myra Nelson
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 22:17, Karol Blazewicz <
> karol.blazew...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > Would it be better to make both sections
> > read ( pacman -Sy then pacman -S package_name or
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> pacman -Syu gpm
It's fine because it's equal to pacman -Sy + pacman -Su + pacman -S gpm
pacman -Su is the crucial step you shouldn't omit.
I think you should use the wiki talk page for suggestions how to
improve the article.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:36, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Myra Nelson
> wrote:
> > pacman -Syu gpm
>
> It's fine because it's equal to pacman -Sy + pacman -Su + pacman -S gpm
> pacman -Su is the crucial step you shouldn't omit.
>
>
> I think you should use the wiki
smplayer is good.
在 2011年12月18日 下午8:35，Ralf Madorf 写道：
> On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 12:23 +, Mauro Santos wrote:
> > Come again? VLC and mplayer have always been able to happily play
> > everything I've thrown at them while many windows players crap
> > themselves out because they either don't kno
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:05 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
>
> I think the biggest issue right now is why ndiswrapper isn't working
> properly.
this isn't a direct solution, but as i spent a great deal of time
recently-ish finding good (USB) wifi chips to use as APs and as a
client stations, it ma
46 matches
Mail list logo
