[arch-general] Patch: [Thread still is closed] Is there a clean solution to get completely rid of Pulseaudio?

On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 18:29 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote: > On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 15:39 +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 00:20:17 +0100 > > Tom Gundersen wrote: > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=114233317926101 > > > > > > > > And equivelent on Linux > > > > > > > > ht

[arch-general] [Thread still is closed] Is there a clean solution to get completely rid of Pulseaudio?

On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 15:39 +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 00:20:17 +0100 > Tom Gundersen wrote: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=114233317926101 > > > > > > And equivelent on Linux > > > > > > http://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=47 > > > > > > You can us

Re: [arch-general] Is there a clean solution to get completely rid of Pulseaudio?

On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 00:20:17 +0100 Tom Gundersen wrote: > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=114233317926101 > > > > And equivelent on Linux > > > > http://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=47 > > > > You can use framebuffer mode or the nouveau driver instead of the > > nvidia binary and

Re: [arch-general] Is there a clean solution to get completely rid of Pulseaudio?

On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:38:14 -0600 Leonid Isaev wrote: > Disabling cap_sys_rawio renders > X unusable with intel drivers (it fails to start with an I/O error). Depends on the driver, newer ati may have a better KMS method than framebuffer but adding vga=ask to the kernel bootline and using xf86-v