On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:28:24 -0400
Evan LeCompte wrote:
> Can you tell us what command you tried to run to generate your key
> pair?
>
> On 15/03/12 at 10:29pm, pete wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:09:28 +
> > pete wrote:
> >
> > > Hi .
> > >
> > > I have just tried to generate a key pa
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 09:01:30PM +0200, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've opened https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28881 "meld uses wrong
> shebang" some time ago. The description reads:
>
> ,
> | meld uses "#! /usr/bin/env python2" as shebang. It should use "#!
> | /usr/bin/python2".
>
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:39:26AM +1000, Mike Sampson wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> just an update on this:
>
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Mike Sampson wrote:
> [snip]
> > $ pypy
> > 'import site' failed
> > Python 2.7.2 (2346207d99463f299f09f3e151c9d5fa9158f71b, Feb 10 2012,
> > 15:07:02)
>
Can you tell us what command you tried to run to generate your key pair?
On 15/03/12 at 10:29pm, pete wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:09:28 +
> pete wrote:
>
> > Hi .
> >
> > I have just tried to generate a key pair and got the following
> >
> > gpg process did not finish cannot generate n
On 15/04/12 11:42, Muhammed Uluyol wrote:
> It looks like they are being compressed with upx.
Wrong...
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Victor Silva wrote:
> My guess is they are shipping less embedded libs.
Wrong...
On 04/13/2012 08:38 PM, Zachary (Asian) wrote:
> My guess is that they sw
It looks like they are being compressed with upx.
Muhammed Uluyol
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Victor Silva wrote:
> My guess is they are shipping less embedded libs.
>
> Em 14 de abril de 2012 14:02, Brendan Long
> escreveu:
>
> > It's just strange that it's happening so consistently, l
Hello list,
just an update on this:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Mike Sampson wrote:
[snip]
> $ pypy
> 'import site' failed
> Python 2.7.2 (2346207d99463f299f09f3e151c9d5fa9158f71b, Feb 10 2012, 15:07:02)
> [PyPy 1.8.0 with GCC 4.6.2] on linux2
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "licen
My cd writer is apparently dead (gets to 60-80% and dies), so I'll be
contributing no useful information. Sorry
However, it seems that using an archboot[1] livecd[2] is the way to go - a
simple install should give you grub2 properly set up, and from there it's just
a matter of configuration.
Hi all,
I've opened https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28881 "meld uses wrong
shebang" some time ago. The description reads:
,
| meld uses "#! /usr/bin/env python2" as shebang. It should use "#!
| /usr/bin/python2".
`
The bug has been closed as "Not a bug" and "Works fine as-is". I've
tried
On 04/13/2012 10:31 PM, Steve Holmes wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:12:12PM +1000, Mike Sampson wrote:
> I switched to emacs-nox from community which works fine. I may even
>> keep using it as it obviously has significantly less dependencies than
>> emacs compiled with X support.
>
> Well, i
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 23:50, Arvid Warnecke wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 02:54:28PM -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
>> >What I have been wondering about now is, if it will be possible to
>> >install Arch without rEFIt and the Mac OS X at all? I read a lot in the
>> >wiki pages, bu
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 07:41:07PM +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> Am 14.04.2012 17:03, schrieb Jeremiah Dodds:
> >>Well, it seems that it is fixed now. I see we have emacs-23.4-2 so I
> >>wonder if our devs patched or something. All good from my vantage point.
>
> Why not using a PKGBUILD from A
Hi Scott,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 02:54:28PM -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> >What I have been wondering about now is, if it will be possible to
> >install Arch without rEFIt and the Mac OS X at all? I read a lot in the
> >wiki pages, but all I found was that if I install Arch only with EFI
> >supp
la, 2012-04-14 kello 19:41 +0200, Stefan Husmann kirjoitti:
> Why not using a PKGBUILD from AUR to do so? We have a fantastic package
> manager, we should use it.
Yeah bulding with the PKGBUILD would be better :D
> How do you deinstall such a self built emacs?
As long as you retain the Makefile you
Am 14.04.2012 17:03, schrieb Jeremiah Dodds:
Steve Holmes writes:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:12:12PM +1000, Mike Sampson wrote:
I switched to emacs-nox from community which works fine. I may even
keep using it as it obviously has significantly less dependencies than
emacs compiled with X su
My guess is they are shipping less embedded libs.
Em 14 de abril de 2012 14:02, Brendan Long escreveu:
> It's just strange that it's happening so consistently, like again today:
>
> Targets (7): dbus-1.4.20-1 dbus-core-1.4.20-2 dbus-python-1.0.0-1
> mkinitcpio-0.8.7-2 qt-4.8.1-2
It's just strange that it's happening so consistently, like again today:
Targets (7): dbus-1.4.20-1 dbus-core-1.4.20-2 dbus-python-1.0.0-1
mkinitcpio-0.8.7-2 qt-4.8.1-2 xorg-server-1.12.1-1
xorg-server-common-1.12.1-1
Total Download Size:21.59 MiB
Total Installe
On 04/13/2012 06:09 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
>> Huh? So how do you set up a chroot with gcc46?
>>
> mount -vt devpts devpts /dev/pts
> mount -vt tmpfs shm /dev/shm
> mount -vt proc proc /proc
> mount -vt sysfs sysfs /sys
>
Thanks Baho,
I actually got that last night and updated the chroot for gcc4
Hi guys,
After gnome-3.4 move out of testing I intend to rebuild all packages
with files in /lib/security to move them to /usr/lib/security.
I'm using this locally and everything seems fine, so I don't expect any issues.
That said, third-party packages should make note of this change as pam
will
Steve Holmes writes:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:12:12PM +1000, Mike Sampson wrote:
> I switched to emacs-nox from community which works fine. I may even
>> keep using it as it obviously has significantly less dependencies than
>> emacs compiled with X support.
>
> Well, it seems that it is fix
Yes fixed in 23.4-2:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29233
Jürgen
2012/4/9 Steve Holmes
> I don't know what happened lately, but I notice that emacs totally locks
> up on me now. It was working find yesterday before I did a major pacman
> -Syu
> this morning. Even if I move my .emacs out of
Hello list,
Anyone having trouble with pypy? I can't find anything on the mailing
list or bug tracker. Running pypy for me gives:
$ pypy
'import site' failed
Python 2.7.2 (2346207d99463f299f09f3e151c9d5fa9158f71b, Feb 10 2012, 15:07:02)
[PyPy 1.8.0 with GCC 4.6.2] on linux2
Type "help", "copyrigh
Am 14.04.2012 03:13, schrieb rafael ff1:
2012/4/13 Paul Gideon Dann:
Just wondering...is there a calligra package set in the works, now that it's
been officially released?
Paul
The [kde-unstable] repo has calligra packages.
Yes, but only the old version.
Please move calligra to extra becuas
23 matches
Mail list logo
