2012/4/30 Rashif Ray Rahman :
> On 30 April 2012 17:35, Lorenzo Bandieri wrote:
>
>> 2012/4/30 Kevin Chadwick :
>> > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:30:23 +0200
>> > Gour wrote:
>> >
>> >> we did embrace LaTeX/LyX etc.
>> >
>> > To get the benefit of your experience. Do you use Lyx as your editor or
>> > s
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> What's the point. To me that's just adding an extra redundant layer
> that could have bugs. I see no point using binaries for configuration
> whatosever. RAM is crazy fast and some SSDs are now as fast as a PIIIs
> ram. How many nanosecond
On 04/30/12 at 09:16pm, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> On 30 April 2012 17:35, Lorenzo Bandieri wrote:
>
> > 2012/4/30 Kevin Chadwick :
> > > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:30:23 +0200
> > > Gour wrote:
> > >
> > >> we did embrace LaTeX/LyX etc.
> > >
> > > To get the benefit of your experience. Do you use L
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:59:02 +0530
> Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
>
>> You are very correct, master documents should always be plain text. The
>> generated documents can be binary however. Also, there should be a fallback
>> system where the plain
On 30 April 2012 17:35, Lorenzo Bandieri wrote:
> 2012/4/30 Kevin Chadwick :
> > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:30:23 +0200
> > Gour wrote:
> >
> >> we did embrace LaTeX/LyX etc.
> >
> > To get the benefit of your experience. Do you use Lyx as your editor or
> > something else.
>
> Sorry if I "jump in",
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:59:02 +0530
Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> You are very correct, master documents should always be plain text. The
> generated documents can be binary however. Also, there should be a fallback
> system where the plain text documents are used rather than binary documents
> so that
On Monday 30 Apr 2012 11:30:23 Gour wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:51:42 +0100
>
> Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > Heck, I save my documents as .txt for secondary backup purposes. I
> > wish I knew that when I was a teenager doing work for school at 3AM
> > and Word lost everything spectacularly well.
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:43:19 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Keep in mind that blind people can't read nice formated documents on
> braille, they anyway need to read the source code ;).
Whatever...I found that when working on non-technical texts, LaTeX
markup takes away focus from writing...and ther
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:55:48 +0100
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> To get the benefit of your experience. Do you use Lyx as your editor
> or something else.
As LaTeX 'front-end'.
your servant,
Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
--
One who is able to withdraw his senses from sense objects,
as the tortoise draws it
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 13:35 +0200, Lorenzo Bandieri wrote:
> 2012/4/30 Kevin Chadwick :
> > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:30:23 +0200
> > Gour wrote:
> >
> >> we did embrace LaTeX/LyX etc.
> >
> > To get the benefit of your experience. Do you use Lyx as your editor or
> > something else.
>
> Sorry if I "
2012/4/30 Kevin Chadwick :
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:30:23 +0200
> Gour wrote:
>
>> we did embrace LaTeX/LyX etc.
>
> To get the benefit of your experience. Do you use Lyx as your editor or
> something else.
Sorry if I "jump in", but as a LaTeX user I usually suggest to stay
away from Lyx. Basicall
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:22:42 +0200
Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> > In my opinion, if I have to start hacking random C to add or adapt
> > features (which happens as soon as the builtins do the wrong things -
> > that's about twice a year for me) it'll be a lot more crashy than a
> > simple shell scri
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:30:23 +0200
Gour wrote:
> we did embrace LaTeX/LyX etc.
To get the benefit of your experience. Do you use Lyx as your editor or
something else.
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:51:42 +0100
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Heck, I save my documents as .txt for secondary backup purposes. I
> wish I knew that when I was a teenager doing work for school at 3AM
> and Word lost everything spectacularly well.
Heh...similar lesson when I was workin on OS2 with Lo
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 01:12:15 -0500
C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> yeah ... i'm a C novice, and i'm pretty sure i can write a stable init
> ... that's kinda the point. init is so incredibly dumb that it
> requires no code. is that really what "unix philosophy" is meant to
> convey? so little code a
The 29/04/12, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> In my opinion, if I have to start hacking random C to add or adapt
> features (which happens as soon as the builtins do the wrong things -
> that's about twice a year for me) it'll be a lot more crashy than a
> simple shell script where I add one line of code.
16 matches
Mail list logo
