Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:38:27 +0100 Kevin Chadwick wrote: > udisks doesn't use mount and so I'm forced to look at the mess which is > polkit and udisks After editing three files (two ineffectual), polkit is atleast unmounting, but before I could look at what that actually means in terms of what ca

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > Maybe it asked some other questions completely unrelated (2 I think), it > > broke immediately after an update including this anyway. > > > > [2012-04-25 11:52] installed udisks2 (1.94.0-1) > > Could be this also, maybe I'll check the chang

Re: [arch-general] rtirq doesn't fit to current kernel-rt at AUR

On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 15:43 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > I'm still using an older kernel on Arch, I just want to inform you, that > I had issues with rtirq for another distro. Fernando from CCRMA did > solve the issue and RUI edited his script, there also was help from > Jeremy: > http://lists.linu

[arch-general] rtirq doesn't fit to current kernel-rt at AUR

I'm still using an older kernel on Arch, I just want to inform you, that I had issues with rtirq for another distro. Fernando from CCRMA did solve the issue and RUI edited his script, there also was help from Jeremy: http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2012-May/084764.html Regar

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:38:27 +0100 Kevin Chadwick wrote: > Maybe it asked some other questions completely unrelated (2 I think), it > broke immediately after an update including this anyway. > > [2012-04-25 11:52] installed udisks2 (1.94.0-1) Could be this also, maybe I'll check the changelogs, l

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On Fri, 04 May 2012 14:59:05 +0300 Ionut Biru wrote: > I'm a bit confused. Where did you answer yes ? I'm just asking because I > did not replaced anything with udisks2. > Maybe it asked some other questions completely unrelated (2 I think), it broke immediately after an update including this an

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:43:03 +0200 > Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> I couldn't find a reference. Do you have a link? As far as I'm aware, >> the only real complaint against udisks2 is that they don't supply >> commandline tools with a stable API. H

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:43:03 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: > As far as I'm aware, > the only real complaint against udisks2 is that they don't supply > commandline tools with a stable API The docs are attrocious which doesn't help, even the online ones. They seem to be using polkit because it adds

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On 05/04/2012 12:46 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > Hi, all > Hi, > "http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/03/11/udisks2-another-loss-for-linux/"; > > I answered yes to the switch to udisks2 and now the mount point only > shows for a split second in Nautilus. The device still shows but now I'm a bit

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:43:03 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: > I couldn't find a reference. Do you have a link? As far as I'm aware, > the only real complaint against udisks2 is that they don't supply > commandline tools with a stable API. However, the dbus api is stable, > so it would be trivial for a

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Pham Bao Trung wrote: > On Fri 04 May 2012 06:16:15 PM ICT, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Am 04.05.2012 11:46, schrieb Kevin Chadwick: >> >>> "http://igurublog.wordpress.**com/2012/03/11/udisks2-** >>> another-loss-for-linux/

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:19:27 +0200 > Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> Please don't take this guy seriously. > > Though he's working on something that seems to fix some of the... > oversights shall we say of udisks. I couldn't find a reference. Do yo

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:19:27 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: > Please don't take this guy seriously. Though he's working on something that seems to fix some of the... oversights shall we say of udisks.

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On Fri 04 May 2012 06:16:15 PM ICT, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 04.05.2012 11:46, schrieb Kevin Chadwick: "http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/03/11/udisks2-another-loss-for-linux/"; I just read this post, and it is what you expect from the ignorant guru: A rant. It is simply general FUD with no

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > "http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/03/11/udisks2-another-loss-for-linux/"; Please don't take this guy seriously. If you read the post that he is basing his rant on, you'll see that he has completely misunderstood udisks2 (as he seems to g

Re: [arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

Am 04.05.2012 11:46, schrieb Kevin Chadwick: > "http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/03/11/udisks2-another-loss-for-linux/"; I just read this post, and it is what you expect from the ignorant guru: A rant. It is simply general FUD with no concrete examples or anything remotely substantial. Although

[arch-general] Switching back to udisk1

Hi, all "http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/03/11/udisks2-another-loss-for-linux/"; I answered yes to the switch to udisks2 and now the mount point only shows for a split second in Nautilus. The device still shows but now I've lost unmount access via sudo too, my scripts clean up on disconnect s