Re: [arch-general] LVM on LUKS and fsck

2012-05-05 Thread Sorin-Mihai Vârgolici
On 06.05.2012 09:02, Jayesh Badwaik wrote: It is there in LVM, not sure about encrypted LVM though. You have both /dev/lvmgroup/lvmvolume and /dev/mapper/lvmgroup-lvmvolume. The /dev/lvmgroup/lvmvolume is a softlink to /dev/dm-x where x is the appropriate number. Is the same on encrypted LVM,

Re: [arch-general] LVM on LUKS and fsck

2012-05-05 Thread Jayesh Badwaik
On Sunday 06 May 2012 06:53:42 Sorin-Mihai Vârgolici wrote: > In ~4 years of using encrypted lvm, I never saw that /dev/lvmvol thing. > I can't figure how you managed to create it and use it in your > config(s). Usually is something like /dev/mapper/lvmgroup-lvmvolume. Are > you sure that LVM was c

Re: [arch-general] LVM on LUKS and fsck

2012-05-05 Thread Christian Hesse
Mauro Santos on Sun, 2012/05/06 03:16: > I have decided to give encryption a shot and I have started with some > bootable usb disks I have as emergency/recovery media. > > Everything works and partitions seem to mount just fine, but during boot > in the fsck fase, root is apparently checked twice

Re: [arch-general] LVM on LUKS and fsck

2012-05-05 Thread Sorin-Mihai Vârgolici
In ~4 years of using encrypted lvm, I never saw that /dev/lvmvol thing. I can't figure how you managed to create it and use it in your config(s). Usually is something like /dev/mapper/lvmgroup-lvmvolume. Are you sure that LVM was created corectly? Did the system ever boot fine? -- <>< Sorin-Mi

[arch-general] LVM on LUKS and fsck

2012-05-05 Thread Mauro Santos
I have decided to give encryption a shot and I have started with some bootable usb disks I have as emergency/recovery media. Everything works and partitions seem to mount just fine, but during boot in the fsck fase, root is apparently checked twice and home apparently doesn't get checked. root: c

Re: [arch-general] [HEADSUP] /lib/security/* moving to /usr/lib/security/

2012-05-05 Thread Adrian C.
On Sat, 5 May 2012, Bjørn Øivind Bjørnsen wrote: > This is a part of the /usr move Thanks, I was oblivious this was happening. -- Adrian C. (anrxc) | anrxc..sysphere.org | PGP ID: D20A0618 PGP FP: 02A5 628A D8EE 2A93 996E 929F D5CB 31B7 D20A 0618

Re: [arch-general] [HEADSUP] /lib/security/* moving to /usr/lib/security/

2012-05-05 Thread Bjørn Øivind Bjørnsen
On 05/05/12 23:19, Adrian C. wrote: > On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> with files in /lib/security to move them to /usr/lib/security. > > Hi Tom, I'm curious, does this move have anything to do with systemd? > > This is a part of the /usr move, as discussed previously here:

Re: [arch-general] [HEADSUP] /lib/security/* moving to /usr/lib/security/

2012-05-05 Thread Adrian C.
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Tom Gundersen wrote: > with files in /lib/security to move them to /usr/lib/security. Hi Tom, I'm curious, does this move have anything to do with systemd? -- Adrian C. (anrxc) | anrxc..sysphere.org | PGP ID: D20A0618 PGP FP: 02A5 628A D8EE 2A93 996E 929F D5CB 31B7 D20A

Re: [arch-general] Dropping squirrelmail

2012-05-05 Thread XeCycle
Genes MailLists writes: [...] > What do you all recommend for webmail - roundcube or something else? My school uses Zimbra. I however don't use it, I'd go with my Gnus. -- Carl Lei (XeCycle) Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University OpenPGP public key: 7795E591 Fingerprint: 1FB6

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Dropping squirrelmail

2012-05-05 Thread Genes MailLists
On 05/05/2012 10:32 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Hi all, > > FYI: I plan to drop squirrelmail from [extra]. It is orphaned and it > wont work with PHP 5.4. (According to pkgstats it has no users anyway) > > Greetings, > > Pierre > Actually just fyi - according to their website it will work wit