Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:06:12PM +0200, Boris Le Ninivin wrote: > I've uploaded a bunch of variations : > http://borisln.deviantart.com/gallery/ , feel free to distribute/use > them :) Nice, a color for everyone. Maybe, they should indeed be bundled into the archlinux-wallpaper package. > I've

Re: [arch-general] drop slim in favor of lightdm

Op 9 mei 2012 15:59 schreef "Christian Hesse" het volgende: > > Christian Hesse on Tue, 2012/05/08 10:35: > > Any thoughts on that? > > Ok, some notes from myself... > > There were two reasons why I did not use lxdm: [...] Just being curious, but wasn't it lxdm that caused a bit of a security st

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

I've uploaded a bunch of variations : http://borisln.deviantart.com/gallery/ , feel free to distribute/use them :) I've licensed them under a CC BY SA license, so you can even sell them if you want :D (But I doubt it could earn you much money :P) - Boris.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-projects] netcfg status?

Am 09.05.2012 16:38, schrieb Jouke Witteveen: > The latest version is in testing for no more than five days now. I > sent a mail regarding the move to core: > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2012-April/002765.html > Not much has happened since and I am quite confident in the st

Re: [arch-general] procps dependency

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:59:04PM +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote: > I am trying to build and burn the archboot iso file on my x86_64 Arch. > > *|[gabx@magnolia Desktop]$ sudo pacman -S archboot > Password: > resolving dependencies... > warning: cannot resolve "procps>=3.2.8-4", a dependency of "archbo

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 23:42 +0800, Yuan wrote: > i want a green one, if i can :) Complementary color of red, so you only need to invert the original ;). I'm kidding :p. - Ralf

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

On 05/09/2012 05:42 PM, Yuan wrote: i want a green one, if i can :) >_> Best regards - Yuan blog github Does the one I've added to the deviant art page fits ? Or do you want some other one ? (Darker, lighter, etc.) - B

[arch-general] procps dependency

I am trying to build and burn the archboot iso file on my x86_64 Arch. *|[gabx@magnolia Desktop]$ sudo pacman -S archboot Password: resolving dependencies... warning: cannot resolve "procps>=3.2.8-4", a dependency of "archboot" :: The following package cannot be upgraded due to unresolvable depen

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

i want a green one, if i can :) >_> Best regards - Yuan blog github On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Boris Le Ninivin wrote: > On 05/09/2012 04:44 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: > >> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:1

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

On 05/09/2012 04:44 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Boris Le Ninivin wrote: Hi everyone. I've made this wallpaper http://borisln.deviantart.com/art/Archlinux-Wallpaper-1-300929958 since I didn't find any red wallpaper which pleased me, big enough for my scr

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Boris Le Ninivin wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I've made this wallpaper > http://borisln.deviantart.com/art/Archlinux-Wallpaper-1-300929958 since I > didn't find any red wallpaper which pleased me, big enough for my screen in > the official package, nor on Google image

Re: [arch-general] drop slim in favor of lightdm

Christian Hesse on Tue, 2012/05/08 10:35: > Any thoughts on that? Ok, some notes from myself... There were two reasons why I did not use lxdm: * I thought it did not work with challenge response authentication via pam. Obviously this is not true: You can enter the password only only, but it i

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

On Wed, 9 May 2012 13:57:14 +0200 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > The way used to handle conditions is wrong. And I admit that for /this/ > particular case, this is not much relevant. > I actually prefer the first case with multiple ifs. It helps newbie techs dive in and read the code. So what if they

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re:RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:45:51 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote: > > On occasions I have had to resort to editing shell init scripts because > > I don't agree with the distro or devs. People shouldn't be forced to > > Gentoo and damaging the environment. > Wat :) > I presume you got distracted and meant

Re: [arch-general] netcfg status?

Am 09.05.2012 13:16, schrieb Geert Hendrickx: > Hi, > > What is the status of netcfg 2.8.x? When will it hit [core] ? > > I have been using it succesfully on my workstation and on two VPS > (static IPv4 + IPv6 profiles). > > > Geert Jouke, should we move it? In general, if you want the

[arch-general] Re: [Bulk] Re:RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

The 09/05/12, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2012 12:30:34 +0200 > Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > > > You should turn them all in things like: > > > > mkdir /sys 2> /dev/null 2>&1 > > cd /sys || { > > ewarn "" > > return 1 > > } > > That's just a little less racy and certainly no

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re:RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

On 05/09/12 19:35, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2012 12:30:34 +0200 > Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > >> You should turn them all in things like: >> >> mkdir /sys 2> /dev/null 2>&1 >> cd /sys || { >> ewarn "" >> return 1 >> } > That's just a little less racy and certainly not > ato

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re:RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

On Wed, 9 May 2012 12:30:34 +0200 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > You should turn them all in things like: > > mkdir /sys 2> /dev/null 2>&1 > cd /sys || { > ewarn "" > return 1 > } That's just a little less racy and certainly not atomic, /usr/bin/install would be atomic. As you have said

[arch-general] netcfg status?

Hi, What is the status of netcfg 2.8.x? When will it hit [core] ? I have been using it succesfully on my workstation and on two VPS (static IPv4 + IPv6 profiles). Geert -- geert.hendrickx.be :: ge...@hendrickx.be :: PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam m

[arch-general] Re: [Bulk] Re:RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

The 07/05/12, Patrick Lauer wrote: > So anyway. If you complain about bad shell, fix it, or throw some > examples at me so I can rewrite them cleanly. "Patch it yourself" is exactly the opposite of what I would expect. This is not peace of mind to add patches to already too much stressed code in

Re: [arch-general] RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

On Wed, 9 May 2012 10:58:01 +0200 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > And dbus will be part of the kernel, soon. > > So, what you call "silly dependencies" *are the core* of a Linux system. So is that sentiment, we'll force it upon you. How lovely. You have read all the security papers about dbus, right

Re: [arch-general] qt applications gone black

On Wednesday 09 May 2012 11:31:08 CodeVision wrote: > QGtkStyle was unable to detect the current GTK+ theme. > > I reckon its the same problem. As far as I know, there's no real > solution for it, just a few workarounds. I solved it by installing > 'gconf' [1] which has a lot less dependencies tha

Re: [arch-general] qt applications gone black

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:31:08AM +0200, CodeVision wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2012 14:34:27 +0530 > gt wrote: > > > I had removed libgnomeui a year back, and everything was working fine > > in the meantime. > > > > Unfortunately libgnomeui fetches a lot of unnecessary gnome stuff, > > gvfs, udisks

Re: [arch-general] qt applications gone black

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:20:13AM +0100, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > On Wednesday 09 May 2012 14:34:27 gt wrote: > > Unfortunately libgnomeui fetches a lot of unnecessary gnome stuff, gvfs, > > udisks2 etc. Isn't there some other solution? > > Qt comes with qtconfig. Have you tried that already?

Re: [arch-general] qt applications gone black

On Wed, 9 May 2012 14:34:27 +0530 gt wrote: > I had removed libgnomeui a year back, and everything was working fine > in the meantime. > > Unfortunately libgnomeui fetches a lot of unnecessary gnome stuff, > gvfs, udisks2 etc. Isn't there some other solution? From your picture and description,

Re: [arch-general] qt applications gone black

On Wednesday 09 May 2012 14:34:27 gt wrote: > Unfortunately libgnomeui fetches a lot of unnecessary gnome stuff, gvfs, > udisks2 etc. Isn't there some other solution? Qt comes with qtconfig. Have you tried that already? Paul

Re: [arch-general] qt applications gone black

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:28:42PM +0700, Diep Pham Van wrote: > I have same problem before, you must install libgnomeui and change GUI > style in qtconfig. I had removed libgnomeui a year back, and everything was working fine in the meantime. Unfortunately libgnomeui fetches a lot of unnecessary

[arch-general] Re: RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

The 07/05/12, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Nyet. Future very certain. Most of us will stick with OpenRC, and do > whatever is needed to keep it working. I don't think so, like developers from inside the Gentoo community itself... > Now that systemd upstream has assimilated udev (which confuses nicely,

Re: [arch-general] qt applications gone black

I have same problem before, you must install libgnomeui and change GUI style in qtconfig. On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:49:48PM +0530, gt wrote: > Hey guys > > I am facing a strange issue. All qt applications have become black, > making them impossible to use. > > Here's an example showing vlc and

[arch-general] qt applications gone black

Hey guys I am facing a strange issue. All qt applications have become black, making them impossible to use. Here's an example showing vlc and avidemux-qt https://imgur.com/a/PR5vH Anyone else facing this issue? The closest i found someone with a similar problem is: https://www.linuxquestions.o