[arch-general] qt applications gone black

2012-05-09 Thread gt
Hey guys I am facing a strange issue. All qt applications have become black, making them impossible to use. Here's an example showing vlc and avidemux-qt https://imgur.com/a/PR5vH Anyone else facing this issue? The closest i found someone with a similar problem is:

Re: [arch-general] qt applications gone black

2012-05-09 Thread Diep Pham Van
I have same problem before, you must install libgnomeui and change GUI style in qtconfig. On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:49:48PM +0530, gt wrote: Hey guys I am facing a strange issue. All qt applications have become black, making them impossible to use. Here's an example showing vlc and

Re: [arch-general] qt applications gone black

2012-05-09 Thread gt
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:28:42PM +0700, Diep Pham Van wrote: I have same problem before, you must install libgnomeui and change GUI style in qtconfig. I had removed libgnomeui a year back, and everything was working fine in the meantime. Unfortunately libgnomeui fetches a lot of unnecessary

Re: [arch-general] qt applications gone black

2012-05-09 Thread Paul Gideon Dann
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 14:34:27 gt wrote: Unfortunately libgnomeui fetches a lot of unnecessary gnome stuff, gvfs, udisks2 etc. Isn't there some other solution? Qt comes with qtconfig. Have you tried that already? Paul

Re: [arch-general] qt applications gone black

2012-05-09 Thread gt
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:31:08AM +0200, CodeVision wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2012 14:34:27 +0530 gt static.vor...@gmx.com wrote: I had removed libgnomeui a year back, and everything was working fine in the meantime. Unfortunately libgnomeui fetches a lot of unnecessary gnome stuff,

Re: [arch-general] qt applications gone black

2012-05-09 Thread Paul Gideon Dann
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 11:31:08 CodeVision wrote: QGtkStyle was unable to detect the current GTK+ theme. I reckon its the same problem. As far as I know, there's no real solution for it, just a few workarounds. I solved it by installing 'gconf' [1] which has a lot less dependencies than

Re: [arch-general] RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

2012-05-09 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Wed, 9 May 2012 10:58:01 +0200 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: And dbus will be part of the kernel, soon. So, what you call silly dependencies *are the core* of a Linux system. So is that sentiment, we'll force it upon you. How lovely. You have read all the security papers about dbus, right?

[arch-general] Re: [Bulk] Re:RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

2012-05-09 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
The 07/05/12, Patrick Lauer wrote: So anyway. If you complain about bad shell, fix it, or throw some examples at me so I can rewrite them cleanly. Patch it yourself is exactly the opposite of what I would expect. This is not peace of mind to add patches to already too much stressed code in

[arch-general] netcfg status?

2012-05-09 Thread Geert Hendrickx
Hi, What is the status of netcfg 2.8.x? When will it hit [core] ? I have been using it succesfully on my workstation and on two VPS (static IPv4 + IPv6 profiles). Geert -- geert.hendrickx.be :: ge...@hendrickx.be :: PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re:RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

2012-05-09 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 05/09/12 19:35, Kevin Chadwick wrote: On Wed, 9 May 2012 12:30:34 +0200 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: You should turn them all in things like: mkdir /sys 2 /dev/null 21 cd /sys || { ewarn the error message return 1 } That's just a little less racy and certainly not atomic,

Re: [arch-general] netcfg status?

2012-05-09 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 09.05.2012 13:16, schrieb Geert Hendrickx: Hi, What is the status of netcfg 2.8.x? When will it hit [core] ? I have been using it succesfully on my workstation and on two VPS (static IPv4 + IPv6 profiles). Geert Jouke, should we move it? In general, if you want the package

Re: [arch-general] [Bulk] Re:RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch

2012-05-09 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:45:51 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote: On occasions I have had to resort to editing shell init scripts because I don't agree with the distro or devs. People shouldn't be forced to Gentoo and damaging the environment. Wat :) I presume you got distracted and meant to

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

2012-05-09 Thread Denis A . Altoé Falqueto
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Boris Le Ninivin boris.lenini...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone. I've made this wallpaper http://borisln.deviantart.com/art/Archlinux-Wallpaper-1-300929958 since I didn't find any red wallpaper which pleased me, big enough for my screen in the official package,

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

2012-05-09 Thread Boris Le Ninivin
On 05/09/2012 04:44 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Boris Le Ninivin boris.lenini...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone. I've made this wallpaper http://borisln.deviantart.com/art/Archlinux-Wallpaper-1-300929958 since I didn't find any red wallpaper which pleased

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

2012-05-09 Thread Yuan
i want a green one, if i can :) _ Best regards - Yuan blog http://blog.lenage.com/ github http://github.com/lenage On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Boris Le Ninivin boris.lenini...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/09/2012 04:44 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: On Wed,

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

2012-05-09 Thread Boris Le Ninivin
On 05/09/2012 05:42 PM, Yuan wrote: i want a green one, if i can :) _ Best regards - Yuan bloghttp://blog.lenage.com/ githubhttp://github.com/lenage Does the one I've added to the deviant art page fits ? Or do you want some other one ? (Darker, lighter, etc.) - Boris

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

2012-05-09 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 23:42 +0800, Yuan wrote: i want a green one, if i can :) Complementary color of red, so you only need to invert the original ;). I'm kidding :p. - Ralf

Re: [arch-general] procps dependency

2012-05-09 Thread gt
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:59:04PM +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote: I am trying to build and burn the archboot iso file on my x86_64 Arch. *|[gabx@magnolia Desktop]$ sudo pacman -S archboot Password: resolving dependencies... warning: cannot resolve procps=3.2.8-4, a dependency of archboot ::

Re: [arch-general] [arch-projects] netcfg status?

2012-05-09 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 09.05.2012 16:38, schrieb Jouke Witteveen: The latest version is in testing for no more than five days now. I sent a mail regarding the move to core: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2012-April/002765.html Not much has happened since and I am quite confident in the state

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

2012-05-09 Thread Boris Le Ninivin
I've uploaded a bunch of variations : http://borisln.deviantart.com/gallery/ , feel free to distribute/use them :) I've licensed them under a CC BY SA license, so you can even sell them if you want :D (But I doubt it could earn you much money :P) - Boris.

Re: [arch-general] drop slim in favor of lightdm

2012-05-09 Thread Guus Snijders
Op 9 mei 2012 15:59 schreef Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de het volgende: Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de on Tue, 2012/05/08 10:35: Any thoughts on that? Ok, some notes from myself... There were two reasons why I did not use lxdm: [...] Just being curious, but wasn't it lxdm that caused a bit