Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

On 05/10/2012 10:22 AM, Rodrigo Rivas wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:36 AM, gt wrote: Who would be cheap enough to make money off your effort, though there are many sick people out there. There are, indeed (remeber the Blender re-branding). But the idea of CC by SA is not that you will sel

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

On 05/10/2012 10:26 AM, SanskritFritz wrote: On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Boris Le Ninivin wrote: I've uploaded a bunch of variations : http://borisln.deviantart.com/** gallery/ , feel free to distribute/use them :) Why don't you just share the (Gi

[arch-general] standards on AUR content

I believe that there should be more comprehensive, clear, and explicit standards on what content is allowed to be installed by an AUR package. There already exist two guidelines [1]: 1. usefulness: "Make sure the package is useful. Will anyone else want to use this package? Is it extremely special

Re: [arch-general] standards on AUR content

2012/5/11 Ruslan Nabioullin : > I believe that there should be more comprehensive, clear, and explicit > standards on what content is allowed to be installed by an AUR package. > There already exist two guidelines [1]: > > 1. usefulness: "Make sure the package is useful. Will anyone else want > to

Re: [arch-general] standards on AUR content

On 05/11/2012 12:33 PM, rafael ff1 wrote: > Your email sounded like AUR is only used to provide software > documentation or books (except for non-free ones). I hope that's not > your intention, as it is not accurate. > > Rafael It is not my intention. I proposed guidelines which would apply to on

Re: [arch-general] wallpaper for 1920x1080 screens.

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Boris Le Ninivin wrote: > On 05/10/2012 10:26 AM, SanskritFritz wrote: > >> >> Why don't you just share the (Gimp? PS?) source? >> > > You're right. I'm not used to do so, since I mainly code, but here it is > : > https://github.com/BorisLN/**Archlinux-Wallpape