[2012-07-09 23:20:38 -0500] David C. Rankin:
> Any background on why files such as 'login' are changing packages?
Click on the "Subscribe" button there:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public
--
Gaetan
pgpvYHz2n2KMz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2012 11:38 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Hmm.. pacman should have taken care of this automatically.
>
> Do: pacman -Sy && pacman -Su --ignore util-linux,shadow && pacman -S shadow
> util-linux. If the last call fails, use --force.
>
> /bin/login
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2012 4:03 AM, "Kevin Mihelich" wrote:
>> I'd be more than happy to work with more developers from upstream, and I
>> just want to re-emphasize that we're in no way some rogue derivative
> flying
>> your flag. If anyone wants to get i
On Jul 10, 2012 4:03 AM, "Kevin Mihelich" wrote:
> I'd be more than happy to work with more developers from upstream, and I
> just want to re-emphasize that we're in no way some rogue derivative
flying
> your flag. If anyone wants to get involved or learn more about what goes
> on, feel free to c
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:35 PM, David C. Rankin <
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 12:54 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>
>> Judging from a brief read of that paragraph I would even conclude that
>> they cannot really use our name and trademark directly as they changed
>> too muc
On 07/09/2012 12:54 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Judging from a brief read of that paragraph I would even conclude that
they cannot really use our name and trademark directly as they changed
too much. :-)
They chose to be completely independent from us which has up- and
downsides. And as lots of ot
Am 09.07.2012 18:44, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:21 PM, David C. Rankin
> wrote:
>> On 07/09/2012 11:16 AM, Daniel Wallace wrote:
>>>
>>> Because Archlinuxarm is unsupported by Archlinux. it is a seperate
>>> project. The same reason archbang, chakra, bridgelinux, and
>>> ar
Am 09.07.2012 18:23, schrieb Mateusz Loskot:
> p.s. I agree the official logo makes the ArchLinux ARM status confusing.
Maybe we should ask them to use a slightly modified logo (maybe include
a microchip into the logo, or another small device).
I don't remember what the agreement with Arch Linux
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:31:05 -0500
Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:39:44 +0100
> "P .NIKOLIC" wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi I am all of a sudden getting lots of these Call Trace reports
> > in the log and just prior to that was having
> >
> > Jul 9 10:12:03 7-of-9 kernel: [ 9092.341622]
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:49 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Tom, All,
>
> I ran into the following error regarding util-linux upgrade. I've looked
> in the forum and the website, but nothing specific to it. The error is:
>
> (72/72) checking for file conflicts
> [###
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:49:46 -0500
> "David C. Rankin" wrote:
>
>> Tom, All,
>>
>>I ran into the following error regarding util-linux upgrade. I've looked
>> in the forum and the website, but nothing specific to it. The error is:
>>
>> (72
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 9 July 2012 17:11, Daniel Wallace wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>> On 9 July 2012 16:49, David C. Rankin
>>> wrote:
>>> > Tom, All,
>>> >
>>> > I ran into the following error regarding util-l
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:21:29 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 11:16 AM, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> > Because Archlinuxarm is unsupported by Archlinux. it is a seperate
> > project. The same reason archbang, chakra, bridgelinux, and
> > archlinux-ppc are seperate as well.
>
> G. T
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:21 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 11:16 AM, Daniel Wallace wrote:
>>
>> Because Archlinuxarm is unsupported by Archlinux. it is a seperate
>> project. The same reason archbang, chakra, bridgelinux, and
>> archlinux-ppc are seperate as well.
>
>
> G. Thanks
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:49:46 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> Tom, All,
>
>I ran into the following error regarding util-linux upgrade. I've looked
> in the forum and the website, but nothing specific to it. The error is:
>
> (72/72) checking for file conflicts
> [#
On 9 July 2012 17:28, Ike Devolder wrote:
> Op maandag 9 juli 2012 17:13:47 schreef Mateusz Loskot:
>> On 9 July 2012 17:11, Daniel Wallace wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> >> On 9 July 2012 16:49, David C. Rankin
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Tom, A
Op maandag 9 juli 2012 17:13:47 schreef Mateusz Loskot:
> On 9 July 2012 17:11, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> >> On 9 July 2012 16:49, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> >> > Tom, All,
> >> >
> >> > I ran into the following error regarding uti
On 07/09/2012 11:10 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote:
One strange thing is that the files generating the conflict are owned
by the shadow package. I don't remember of any warning about forcing
updates for util-linux in arch-devel. It seems to me like a packaging
bug.
Not a bug -- if the proble
On 9 July 2012 17:17, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:13:47PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> On 9 July 2012 17:11, Daniel Wallace wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> >> On 9 July 2012 16:49, David C. Rankin
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Tom,
On 9 July 2012 17:16, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:06:55AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> On 07/09/2012 10:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:> Check the ArchLinux ARM forum:
>> >
>> > http://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3036&p=18467
>>
>> Why do we have different foru
On 07/09/2012 11:16 AM, Daniel Wallace wrote:
Because Archlinuxarm is unsupported by Archlinux. it is a seperate
project. The same reason archbang, chakra, bridgelinux, and
archlinux-ppc are seperate as well.
G. Thanks Daniel,
That's what was confusing -- ARM certainly looks official fl
2012/7/9 Daniel Wallace :
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:06:55AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> On 07/09/2012 10:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:> Check the ArchLinux ARM forum:
>> >
>> > http://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3036&p=18467
>>
>> Why do we have different forum systems with diff
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:06:55AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 10:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:> Check the ArchLinux ARM forum:
> >
> > http://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3036&p=18467
>
> Why do we have different forum systems with different login
> requirements for d
On 9 July 2012 17:11, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> On 9 July 2012 16:49, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> > Tom, All,
>> >
>> > I ran into the following error regarding util-linux upgrade. I've looked
>> > in the forum and the website, but no
On 9 July 2012 17:06, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 10:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:> Check the ArchLinux ARM forum:
>>
>> http://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3036&p=18467
>
> Why do we have different forum systems with different login requirements
> for different Arch issues?
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:52:08PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 9 July 2012 16:49, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > Tom, All,
> >
> > I ran into the following error regarding util-linux upgrade. I've looked
> > in the forum and the website, but nothing specific to it. The error is:
> >
> > (72/72
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:01 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 10:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>
>> Check the ArchLinux ARM forum:
>>
>> http://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3036&p=18467
>>
>> where filesystem upgrade is suggested:
>>
>> pacman -Syuf
>>
>> But, I'd wait until som
On 07/09/2012 10:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:> Check the ArchLinux ARM forum:
>
> http://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3036&p=18467
Why do we have different forum systems with different login requirements
for different Arch issues? Seem like KISS would dictate - 1 system and 1 login
On 07/09/2012 10:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Check the ArchLinux ARM forum:
http://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3036&p=18467
where filesystem upgrade is suggested:
pacman -Syuf
But, I'd wait until someone confirms it is the right way to go.
Thank you Mateusz!
We will wait for
On 9 July 2012 16:49, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Tom, All,
>
> I ran into the following error regarding util-linux upgrade. I've looked
> in the forum and the website, but nothing specific to it. The error is:
>
> (72/72) checking for file conflicts
> [###]
Tom, All,
I ran into the following error regarding util-linux upgrade. I've looked in
the forum and the website, but nothing specific to it. The error is:
(72/72) checking for file conflicts
[###] 100%
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> AFAIK, but this can be wrong, the real problem with NM is not having read-only
> resolv.conf, but protecting /etc/hosts...
I don't see a problem with read-only /etc/hosts. It shouldn't contain
anything other than "::1 localhost" anyway. Use ns
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:39:44 +0100
"P .NIKOLIC" wrote:
>
> Hi I am all of a sudden getting lots of these Call Trace reports in
> the log and just prior to that was having
>
> Jul 9 10:12:03 7-of-9 kernel: [ 9092.341622] claws-mail[2310] general
> protection ip:7feef8e5b2f1 sp:7fff657bdcd0 er
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:51:11 +0200
Tom Gundersen wrote:
>[...]
>
> What should work (but might not!): /etc and /usr (and /lib, /sbin,
> /bin) should be able to be mounted read-only. I expect you'll have to
> figure out how to deal with /etc/resolv.conf, I wonder if
> NetworkManager has learnt how
On lun 09/07/12, 07:38, Genes MailLists wrote:
> Now certain bash commands (e.g. "su -") give this error (sorry for wrap)
>
> -bash: warning: setlocale: LC_CTYPE: cannot change locale
> (en_US.UTF-8): No such file or directory
> -bash: warning: setlocale: LC_NUMERIC: cannot change locale
> (en_U
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> The initscripts-systemd package will add support for both rc.local and
>> individual rc.d scripts.
>
> Cool so the statement from the design document.
>
> "So, let's get rid of shell scripts in the boot process!"
>
> Is more like reduce than
> Since you decided /not/ to google and try writing one on your own,
> here's a two-liner.
You shouldn't need to Google to be sure of that. Thankyou for saving me
more time than it cost you.
> ---
> [Service]
> ExecStart=/usr/bin/xinetd -dontfork
> ---
>
> > I guess you can fall back to rc anywa
Em 09-07-2012 02:53, Arvid Warnecke escreveu:
I am looking for a software for my Epson V700 Photo scanner which is
able to scan in batch mode.
You should install sane:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sane
Then you can use the command line. Read the manual:
$ man scanimage
Cheers,
Vitor
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> I write my own because
>> "systemctl enable wicd.service" failed
>> The error message is
>> Failed to issue method call: File exists
>>
>>
>> So I decide to google and write it on my own
>
> So what would be the bare minimum unit file t
Hi I am all of a sudden getting lots of these Call Trace reports in
the log and just prior to that was having
Jul 9 10:12:03 7-of-9 kernel: [ 9092.341622] claws-mail[2310] general
protection ip:7feef8e5b2f1 sp:7fff657bdcd0 error:0 in
libhogweed.so.2.1[7feef8e5+12000] Jul 9 10:12:36 7-of-
On 07/09/12 07:48, Dave Reisner wrote:
You need to regenerate your locales with 'locale-gen'.
Thank you both - that fixed it (I needed to uncomment en_US_xxx in
/etc/locale-gen first.
thanks again
gene
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> -bash: warning: setlocale: LC_CTYPE: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8): No
> such file or directory
> -bash: warning: setlocale: LC_NUMERIC: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8):
> No such file or directory
> -bash: warning: setlocale: LC_TIM
After the latest glibc update in testing I found the following issue.
The udpate to glibc 2.16.0-2 went well - and /lib is now a soft link
to /usr/lib.
Things seemed to be fine - I was using computer with no problems,
then after a sleep/resume cycle my kde session logged me out. I re
> further:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/a/1561245/404019
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bcrypt
>
> ... i can't find any literature suggesting sha512 decreases your
> security, and no reason to bother switching. both are good solutions.
This is interesting WRT memory usage. Whether it's a reason
> >> I write my own because
> >> "systemctl enable wicd.service" failed
> >> The error message is
> >> Failed to issue method call: File exists
> >>
> >>
> >> So I decide to google and write it on my own
> >
> > So what would be the bare minimum unit file to add a commandline. I ask
> > becau
On Monday 09 Jul 2012 07:53:59 Arvid Warnecke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is not too much Arch related, but maybe there are some analogue
> photographers on the list who can give me some hints?
> I am looking for a software for my Epson V700 Photo scanner which is
> able to scan in batch mode.
> I insta
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> I write my own because
>> "systemctl enable wicd.service" failed
>> The error message is
>> Failed to issue method call: File exists
>>
>>
>> So I decide to google and write it on my own
>
> So what would be the bare minimum unit file to
> /tmp is a tmpfs for a default Arch install, so you don't need to worry about
> that.
So it is, likely on the clients too and so may not have applied
here anyway.
--
Why not do something good every day and install BOINC.
__
On Monday 09 Jul 2012 10:08:51 you wrote:
> My setup has the nodes mounting root rw, but in practice they never touch it
> except for when I run an upgrade or do some manual configuration, which I
> usually do from a node (because it's easier).
Oh, also, my setup has a separate root shared by the
On Monday 09 Jul 2012 10:11:43 Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > No experiece at all, but I'd say that /var must be writeable too. Think of
> > it some like the /home of the system, so you should have one per machine
> > in
> > the NFS server.
> And /tmp.
/tmp is a tmpfs for a default Arch install, so you
> > I'd use connman for handling the net connection and it seems to require a
> > writable /var/lib/connman/
> >
>
> No experiece at all, but I'd say that /var must be writeable too. Think of
> it some like the /home of the system, so you should have one per machine in
> the NFS server.
>
> Jus
> I write my own because
> "systemctl enable wicd.service" failed
> The error message is
> Failed to issue method call: File exists
>
>
> So I decide to google and write it on my own
So what would be the bare minimum unit file to add a commandline. I ask
because polkit is rediculous to edit
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:53:59AM +0200, Arvid Warnecke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is not too much Arch related, but maybe there are some analogue
> photographers on the list who can give me some hints?
> I am looking for a software for my Epson V700 Photo scanner which is
> able to scan in batch mode
On 09.07.2012 10:10, Damjan wrote:
> Has anyone done any research on stateless ArchLinux instances.
>
> A stateless Arch would be one where the root filesystem is mounted
> read-only and nothing changes there. Thus it can mounted over network
> (using NFS, NBD and similar) by several, diskless,
On Monday 09 Jul 2012 10:10:07 Damjan wrote:
> Has anyone done any research on stateless ArchLinux instances.
>
> A stateless Arch would be one where the root filesystem is mounted
> read-only and nothing changes there. Thus it can mounted over network
> (using NFS, NBD and similar) by several, di
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Damjan wrote:
>> Has anyone done any research on stateless ArchLinux instances.
>>
>> A stateless Arch would be one where the root filesystem is mounted read-only
>> and nothing changes there. Thus it can mou
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Damjan wrote:
> Has anyone done any research on stateless ArchLinux instances.
>
> A stateless Arch would be one where the root filesystem is mounted read-only
> and nothing changes there. Thus it can mounted over network (using NFS, NBD
> and similar) by several,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Damjan wrote:
> I'd use connman for handling the net connection and it seems to require a
> writable /var/lib/connman/
>
No experiece at all, but I'd say that /var must be writeable too. Think of
it some like the /home of the system, so you should have one per ma
Has anyone done any research on stateless ArchLinux instances.
A stateless Arch would be one where the root filesystem is mounted
read-only and nothing changes there. Thus it can mounted over network
(using NFS, NBD and similar) by several, diskless, PCs at the same time.
I plan to have per u
59 matches
Mail list logo
