By the way, is it possible to upgrade password hashes without an
intermediate password, assuming the new/old passwords are identical?
Hello,
systemd is not setting my console font. The following is the only
relevant config I could think of:
/etc/vconsole.conf :
> KEYMAP=dvorak
> FONT=ohsnap6x11r
Using the command
> setfont ohsnap6x11r
works perfectly to change the font to that desired.
Cheers,
pants.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/12 20:52, David C. Rankin wrote:
> And what is /usr and /lib as _separate_ partitions on the main box?
> softlinks won't work across partition boundaries -- so what then?
Tom is right. You're thinking of *hard* links, which I think don't
work
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:52 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> So then since /lib is very much still a directory and not a symlink, then I
> should:
First, notice that /lib as a symlink is only in testing so far, so
that might explain why you haven't seen it yet. It could be that your
problem is unr
On 07/10/2012 04:12 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:15 PM, David C. Rankin
> wrote:
>> > Guys,
>> >
>> > I have read the recent thread about glibc problems and I am totally
>> > confused about what I am still supposed to have in /lib...
> Nothing, but everything:
> Both
Hi,
Am 10.07.2012 19:47, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> Hopefully more packages (upstream) will eventually allow both
> consolekit and systemd support to be compiled in, and the choice be
> made at runtime.
Ok, makes sense. I can totally live with ConsoleKit for now, just wanted
to make sure that you de
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:15 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have read the recent thread about glibc problems and I am totally
> confused about what I am still supposed to have in /lib...
Nothing, but everything:
Both "/lib" and "/lib64" should be symlinks to "usr/lib". If they are
di
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Rodrigo Rivas
wrote:
> Ubuntu has made the point clear that it does not plan to switch to systemd.
> Ever.
As I understand it that decision most likely revolved around the
investment they had already made in, and control they have over
upstart.
=-Jameson
Guys,
I have read the recent thread about glibc problems and I am totally
confused about what I am still supposed to have in /lib... Currently something
is broken with glibc because after update, the tdebase package (kdebase for
trinity) fails to build from source with the following:
Scann
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> A lot of dependencies needs to be removed, so I'll wait until Arch,
> Debian and Ubuntu completely switched to systemd.
>
Ubuntu has made the point clear that it does not plan to switch to systemd.
Ever.
Anyway, I'm inclined to think that th
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Just recently I've realized that ConsoleKit is not maintained actively
> anymore and the focus is on systemd right now (see [1]). This is already
> mentioned in the wiki [2].
>
> Unfortunately I couldn't find any statement as to whether Arch
On 07/10/2012 08:37 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm about to set up a new machine and want to make use of systemd.
>> Currently I'm reading up on the topic as systemd changes quite a lot of
>> things.
>>
>> Just recently I've realized
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 19:23 +0200, Karol Babioch wrote:
> I'm wondering whether there has been some discussion over that already?
IIRC not on that List. Some weeks ago I again mentioned that there's an
annoying bug/feature for console-kit on Debian user mailing list.
Somebody informed me about sys
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm about to set up a new machine and want to make use of systemd.
> Currently I'm reading up on the topic as systemd changes quite a lot of
> things.
>
> Just recently I've realized that ConsoleKit is not maintained actively
> anymor
Hi,
I'm about to set up a new machine and want to make use of systemd.
Currently I'm reading up on the topic as systemd changes quite a lot of
things.
Just recently I've realized that ConsoleKit is not maintained actively
anymore and the focus is on systemd right now (see [1]). This is already
me
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:02:23 +0800, zhugehonghn wrote:
> I set mutt+offlineimap receive my Gmail
> my .offlineimaprc is:
> /[general]
> ui = Blinkenlights
> accounts = GMail
>
> [Account GMail]
> localrepository = Gmail-Local
> remoterepository = Gmail-Remote
>
> [Repository Gmail-Local]
> type
On 10-07-2012 23.02, zhugehonghn wrote:
> I set mutt+offlineimap receive my Gmail
> my .offlineimaprc is:
> /[general]
> ui = Blinkenlights
> accounts = GMail
>
> [Account GMail]
> localrepository = Gmail-Local
> remoterepository = Gmail-Remote
>
> [Repository Gmail-Local]
> type = Maildir
> loca
On 07/10/2012 05:09 PM, Guus Snijders wrote:
2012/7/10 Jameson :
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Kwpolska wrote:
Isn’t that contrary to your plan? You want to use easier, lighter and
more KISS software. And you want to switch to systemd. Which is
anywhere near KISS.
I probably shouldn't
2012/7/10 Jameson :
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Kwpolska wrote:
>> Isn’t that contrary to your plan? You want to use easier, lighter and
>> more KISS software. And you want to switch to systemd. Which is
>> anywhere near KISS.
>
> I probably shouldn't even go here, but IMHO, having one
On 07/10/2012 04:57 PM, Alexandre Ferrando wrote:
On 10 July 2012 16:56, Arno Gaboury wrote:
With systemd-tools replacing udev, I thought it was a first step to move
later to systemd. Then I remember a very long discussion on this list about
a potential move to systemd. I shall have misanderst
I set mutt+offlineimap receive my Gmail
my .offlineimaprc is:
/[general]
ui = Blinkenlights
accounts = GMail
[Account GMail]
localrepository = Gmail-Local
remoterepository = Gmail-Remote
[Repository Gmail-Local]
type = Maildir
localfolders = ~/Mails/Gmail
[Repository Gmail-Remote]
type = Gmail
On 10 July 2012 16:56, Arno Gaboury wrote:
> With systemd-tools replacing udev, I thought it was a first step to move
> later to systemd. Then I remember a very long discussion on this list about
> a potential move to systemd. I shall have misanderstood then!
Wrong. That was because of upstream
On 07/10/2012 04:50 PM, Nicholas MIller wrote:
On Jul 10, 2012 9:47 AM, "Arno Gaboury" wrote:
On 07/10/2012 04:42 PM, Kwpolska wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Arno Gaboury
wrote:
On 07/10/2012 04:19 PM, gt wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote:
Dear l
On Jul 10, 2012 9:47 AM, "Arno Gaboury" wrote:
>
> On 07/10/2012 04:42 PM, Kwpolska wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Arno Gaboury
wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/10/2012 04:19 PM, gt wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote:
>
> Dear list
>
>
On 07/10/2012 04:42 PM, Kwpolska wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Arno Gaboury wrote:
On 07/10/2012 04:19 PM, gt wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote:
Dear list
I am switching lots of my GUI apps to CLI ones.
Currently, I am moving from Clemetine music p
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Kwpolska wrote:
> Isn’t that contrary to your plan? You want to use easier, lighter and
> more KISS software. And you want to switch to systemd. Which is
> anywhere near KISS.
I probably shouldn't even go here, but IMHO, having one program start
and stop stuff
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Arno Gaboury wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 04:19 PM, gt wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear list
>>>
>>> I am switching lots of my GUI apps to CLI ones.
>>> Currently, I am moving from Clemetine music player to ncmpcpp.
On 07/10/2012 04:19 PM, gt wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote:
Dear list
I am switching lots of my GUI apps to CLI ones.
Currently, I am moving from Clemetine music player to ncmpcpp.
[snip]
So, when are you switching to mutt :P
Oh la la!! It is on my list! Sha
On 07/10/2012 04:19 PM, gt wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote:
Dear list
I am switching lots of my GUI apps to CLI ones.
Currently, I am moving from Clemetine music player to ncmpcpp.
[snip]
So, when are you switching to mutt :P
Oh la la!! It is on my list! Sha
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote:
> Dear list
>
> I am switching lots of my GUI apps to CLI ones.
> Currently, I am moving from Clemetine music player to ncmpcpp.
> [snip]
So, when are you switching to mutt :P
On 07/10/2012 01:55 PM, Ben Darby wrote:
* Arno Gaboury (arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com) wrote:
>user "mpd"
audio_output {
type"pulse"
name"pulse audio"
Using mpd & pulse you need to run mpd as the same user that you're
logged in with and accessin
* Arno Gaboury (arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com) wrote:
>user "mpd"
> >audio_output {
> >type"pulse"
> >name"pulse audio"
Using mpd & pulse you need to run mpd as the same user that you're
logged in with and accessing pulse with on the desktop.
--
be
Dear list
I am switching lots of my GUI apps to CLI ones.
Currently, I am moving from Clemetine music player to ncmpcpp.
My*mpd.conf *shall have some incorrect settings, as *mpd.log *returns
this error:
Jul 10 13:04 : avahi: Service 'Music Player' successfully established.
No protocol specif
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 11:06 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> My suggestion (which I also brought up further down in this thread) is
> that you *slightly* distinguish your project from Arch Linux by adding a
> small change to the logo. The word "ARM" in small letters in the lower
> right corner of the
> Now, what's the confusion here? People seem to think that you are part
> of the main Arch Linux project and are thus confused as to why you have
> separate forums.
I've only seen one person express confusion on this point... is this
really a problem?
--
John K Pate http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.u
Am 09.07.2012 22:03, schrieb Kevin Mihelich:
> Around March/April 2011, we contacted Aaron Griffin and got
> explicit permission to rename our distribution to Arch Linux ARM since we
> were rapidly expanding our focus from plug computers to a wide variety of
> ARM platforms, and had also brought ou
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 19:54 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am 09.07.2012 18:44, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:21 PM, David C. Rankin
> > wrote:
> >> On 07/09/2012 11:16 AM, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Because Archlinuxarm is unsupported by Archlinux. it is a seperate
>
09.07.2012 01:15, Arno Gaboury пишет:
> On 07/07/2012 07:28 PM, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 13:25:29 -0400, Dave Reisner wrote:
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> Allan pushed glib 2.16-2 into [testing] which removes /lib as a
>>> directory, replacing it with a symlink. A bit of advice...
>
38 matches
Mail list logo
