On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 01:17:37AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> What happened to the arch setup autoinstaller script that guided you though
> the install process?? It was minimal, and worked very well to guide you
> through.
> Even helpful with raid installs after your arrays were
On 04/08/12 at 01:17am, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> What happened to the arch setup autoinstaller script that guided you though
> the install process?? It was minimal, and worked very well to guide you
> through.
> Even helpful with raid installs after your arrays were assembled and
> pa
Am 04.08.2012 08:17, schrieb David C. Rankin:
> Guys,
>
> What happened to the arch setup autoinstaller script that guided you though
> the install process?? It was minimal, and worked very well to guide you
> through.
> Even helpful with raid installs after your arrays were assembled and
> part
Guys,
What happened to the arch setup autoinstaller script that guided you though
the install process?? It was minimal, and worked very well to guide you through.
Even helpful with raid installs after your arrays were assembled and
partitioned. Now, unless I'm completely missing something, we a
On Aug 3, 2012 7:56 PM, "Jackson Alley" wrote:
>
> On 08/03/2012 08:50 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> > On Aug 3, 2012 5:32 PM, "Jackson Alley"
wrote:
> >> On 08/03/2012 06:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jackson Alley <
toomanymirr...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
On 08/03/2012 08:50 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2012 5:32 PM, "Jackson Alley" wrote:
>> On 08/03/2012 06:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jackson Alley
> wrote:
Ok, looks like I've got an unusual setup and am having issues at boot.
I've got
On Aug 3, 2012 5:32 PM, "Jackson Alley" wrote:
>
> On 08/03/2012 06:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jackson Alley
wrote:
> >> Ok, looks like I've got an unusual setup and am having issues at boot.
> >> I've got multi-device btrfs raid and am still using the old rc
Norbert Zeh [2012.08.03 1943 -0300]:
> gt [2012.08.03 1526 +0530]:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 10:15:33AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> > > > Probably the only people running Linux systems without cups are the
> > > > DIY distro groups (Arch
gt [2012.08.03 1526 +0530]:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 10:15:33AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> > > Probably the only people running Linux systems without cups are the
> > > DIY distro groups (Arch, gentoo etc.) as I don't think this would have
On 08/03/2012 06:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jackson Alley
> wrote:
>> Ok, looks like I've got an unusual setup and am having issues at boot.
>> I've got multi-device btrfs raid and am still using the old rc/init
>> layout.
> Could you give more info. What exact
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jackson Alley wrote:
> Ok, looks like I've got an unusual setup and am having issues at boot.
> I've got multi-device btrfs raid and am still using the old rc/init
> layout.
Could you give more info. What exactly fails? What is the output?
> I found this, but hav
>
> A very misleading name :)
>
I have been concerned about the confusion because of "mime types". I was
going for something like mimic because the backups resemble the primary
file system. I might change it in the future, just haven't found a good
name yet. Thanks for the input.
--
Yesterd
On 07/27/2012 03:04 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Seems not many of us yet use btrfs, I therefore would like to ask if
> any users can signoff on the btrfs-progs in testing (i.e. verify that
> the package appears to work).
>
> In particular, I'm interested to hear if someone who uses btrf
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Squall Lionheart
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few weeks ago there was a thread regarding the best "Arch" way of backing
> up /etc and I mentioned that I wrote a backup program that works very well
> for that. I promised I would let everyone know when my new version becam
Hello,
A few weeks ago there was a thread regarding the best "Arch" way of backing
up /etc and I mentioned that I wrote a backup program that works very well
for that. I promised I would let everyone know when my new version became
available, and today is that day. I don't have an AUR package ye
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:40:15 -0400
Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 3 August 2012 13:03, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:35:10 -0500
> > Sander Jansen wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:31:06 -0400
> >> > Jack Silver wrote
> there is a whole discussion on why static linking is good on http://sta.li
There is also a whole distribution that statically compiles everything
and gives various arguments for doing so.
Pacman depends on shell scripts too. I guess the location of those
would also need to be considered.
--
_
On 3 August 2012 14:22, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Calvin Morrison
> wrote:
>> there is a whole discussion on why static linking is good on http://sta.li
>
> Including such gems as: "Of course Ulrich Drepper thinks that dynamic
> linking is great, but clearly that’
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> there is a whole discussion on why static linking is good on http://sta.li
Including such gems as: "Of course Ulrich Drepper thinks that dynamic
linking is great, but clearly that’s because of his lack of experience
and his delusions of gra
On 3 August 2012 13:03, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:35:10 -0500
> Sander Jansen wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>> > On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:31:06 -0400
>> > Jack Silver wrote:
>> >
>> >> To exchange information I want to let know this list that I
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:35:10 -0500
Sander Jansen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:31:06 -0400
> > Jack Silver wrote:
> >
> >> To exchange information I want to let know this list that I have filled a
> >> feature request form to ask for a st
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:31:06 -0400
> Jack Silver wrote:
>
>> To exchange information I want to let know this list that I have filled a
>> feature request form to ask for a statically builded pacman.
>>
>> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30993
On 3 August 2012 12:29, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:31:06 -0400
> Jack Silver wrote:
>
>> To exchange information I want to let know this list that I have filled a
>> feature request form to ask for a statically builded pacman.
>>
>> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30993
>>
>> Com
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:31:06 -0400
Jack Silver wrote:
> To exchange information I want to let know this list that I have filled a
> feature request form to ask for a statically builded pacman.
>
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30993
>
> Comments welcome in the bug manager.
>
> جاك الفضة
Well
On 03.08.2012 17:55, Menachem Moystoviz wrote:
> I'll try to patch it tomorrow evening, along with PKGBUILD's manpage
> and the wiki page.
Wait for the next pacman version because all this VCS code is being
rewritten. Check the pacman-dev mailing list archives for more details.
PS: Also please st
Thanks.
This: http://www.archlinux.org/pacman/PKGBUILD.5.html#_development_directives
explains a bit more,
but does not state whether, if I define _gitroot and _gitname, pkgver
is optional.
I tested it, and pkgver is neccessary. However, this is absurd and
should be changed in a patch.
I'll try to
On 8/3/2012 6:56 AM, Menachem Moystoviz wrote:
I am a bit confused regarding makepkg's versioning of packages.
From what Allan said on this mailing list a couple of days ago, custom
support is being added to makepkg.
In addition, from what I can see on the wiki and manpages, the only
variable in
On 08/02/2012 05:24 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Are you running ntpd ? Could be related to:
http://serverfault.com/questions/403732/anyone-else-experiencing-high-rates-of-linux-server-crashes-during-a-leap-second
Try stopping the ntpd and setting the date manually as suggested. Then
start nt
To exchange information I want to let know this list that I have filled a
feature request form to ask for a statically builded pacman.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30993
Comments welcome in the bug manager.
جاك الفضة
On 03/08/12 00:55, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
>> wrote:
>>> Are there any plans for eventually adopting Wayland over X?
>>
>> I'm not aware of any discussions.
>>
>> If I understand c
I am a bit confused regarding makepkg's versioning of packages.
>From what Allan said on this mailing list a couple of days ago, custom
support is being added to makepkg.
In addition, from what I can see on the wiki and manpages, the only
variable influencing the versioning is pkgver.
However, from
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 10:15:33AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> > Probably the only people running Linux systems without cups are the
> > DIY distro groups (Arch, gentoo etc.) as I don't think this would have
> > been caught in the bigger distr
Am 03.08.2012 07:49, schrieb Jeremiah Dodds:
> To sum up:
>
> I consistently needed to manually choose the networking setup step in
> order for a netcfg profile to be generated, it was consistently
> skipped over as a selected choice after the keyboard/console font
> step.
fixed in git tree
Sent from my Galaxy S2 running Cyanogenmod 9 Come and chat on
Googletalk
On Aug 3, 2012 11:32 AM, "Jayesh Badwaik"
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 03 Aug 2012 11:01:24 arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > Sorry for my dyslexie, it is indeed the fontspec package. This package
> > is in Texlive and suppos
Hi,
On Friday 03 Aug 2012 11:01:24 arnaud gaboury wrote:
> Sorry for my dyslexie, it is indeed the fontspec package. This package
> is in Texlive and supposed to work with Texlive 2012, according to
> the readme on the CTAN website.
>
> I managed without.
Fontspec works with TexLive 2012, but req
Sent from my Galaxy S2 running Cyanogenmod 9 Come and chat on
Googletalk
On Aug 3, 2012 10:41 AM, "Vladimir Lomov" wrote:
>
> Hello,
> ** Arno Gaboury [2012-08-03 09:42:48 +0200]:
>
> > On 03/08/12||11:06, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> ** Arno Gaboury [2012-07-31 10:23:15 +0200]:
Hello,
** Arno Gaboury [2012-08-03 09:42:48 +0200]:
> On 03/08/12||11:06, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
>> Hello,
>> ** Arno Gaboury [2012-07-31 10:23:15 +0200]:
>>> Dear list,
>>> I use Texlive + Texmaker to write some documents.
>>> I can't find an easy and solid way to install new packages from
>>>
> The package I wanted is . It is included in Texlive 2012, but
> doesn't work. When \usepackage{specfront}, Texmaker returns an error.
As I see it, there is no package 'specfont' on CTAN. If you meant 'fontspec' for
changing fonts in LaTeX documents, you have to use 'lualatex' rather than
'pdflat
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Guillaume Brunerie
>> wrote:
>>> 2012/8/2 Ray Kohler :
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Scott Weisman wrote:
> I should have added more details. I
On 03/08/12||11:06, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
> Hello,
> ** Arno Gaboury [2012-07-31 10:23:15 +0200]:
>
> > Dear list,
>
> > I use Texlive + Texmaker to write some documents.
> > I can't find an easy and solid way to install new packages from
> > CTAN.Package tlmgr from AUR couldn't compil on my box
The 03/08/12, Zhengyu Xu wrote:
> Just a few seconds ago I found the origin of this bug. If I boot my
> laptop with iphone connected, the upower.service will crashed. Otherwise
> it will work fine. Starting from this point, I also noticed that the
> gnome-power-monitor failed to get the informatio
41 matches
Mail list logo
