On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>> After my research on sysvinit, the simple version, I'm working my way
>>> through systemd. Two things I noticed about the cups co
On 08/25/2012 10:47 PM, rafael ff1 wrote:
2012/8/25 Randy :
Hello,
Is anyone here using "stapler-git" from the AUR? I'm trying to use it to
combine two pdf files into one and it's not working for me.
When using the command "stapler cat 1.pdf 2.pdf output.pdf" it just returns
the message "error
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:25:36PM -0400, Randy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is anyone here using "stapler-git" from the AUR? I'm trying to use
> it to combine two pdf files into one and it's not working for me.
>
Hi Randy,
I haven't tried stapler but I use pdfjoin whenever I want to merge two or
more pd
2012/8/25 Randy :
> Hello,
>
> Is anyone here using "stapler-git" from the AUR? I'm trying to use it to
> combine two pdf files into one and it's not working for me.
>
> When using the command "stapler cat 1.pdf 2.pdf output.pdf" it just returns
> the message "error".
>
> Could someone try this to
Hello,
Is anyone here using "stapler-git" from the AUR? I'm trying to use it to
combine two pdf files into one and it's not working for me.
When using the command "stapler cat 1.pdf 2.pdf output.pdf" it just
returns the message "error".
Could someone try this to see if it works ok?
Thanks
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:23:33PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> > So it's only needs twice the time with only on third of the ticks? Well
>> > that is awesome... Yeah to systemd!
>>
>> systemd is much more complicated, a
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Bigby James wrote:
> Having watched this thread (and the "Beware" thread) for some time, I can
> say without equivocation that Felipe is not trying to "reason" with
> anyone. He clearly doesn't understand the concepts he himself refers to
> (rules of evidence, bu
2012/8/25 Juan Diego Tascón :
> Good day,
Hello :)
> I'm thinking of
> setting the default FORWARD policy to ACCEPT as my default INPUT
> policy is DROP and unless there is a valid FORWARD rule for a given
> port the packets wont go anywhere. I'm I right on this?
You're wrong. Either a packet go
On 25.08.2012 18:47, Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
Good day,
I'm currently configuring a router. I'm setting the default policies
to DROP in the INPUT OUTPUT AND FORWARD chains. I'm thinking of
setting the default FORWARD policy to ACCEPT as my default INPUT
policy is DROP and unless there is a valid
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 05:56:32AM -0600, Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:24:31PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> > so buck up, do something useful, or find
> > another outlet ... puh-puh-please?
>
> I'm not sure exactly what you're asking for here.
>
> When
Good day,
I'm currently configuring a router. I'm setting the default policies
to DROP in the INPUT OUTPUT AND FORWARD chains. I'm thinking of
setting the default FORWARD policy to ACCEPT as my default INPUT
policy is DROP and unless there is a valid FORWARD rule for a given
port the packets wont
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia <
archli...@ishpeck.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:03:44PM -0300, Denis A. Alto?? Falqueto wrote:
> > You know that all this jibber-jabber could be easily avoided if you
> > just asked for help or opened bug reports, don't y
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:24:31PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> ... are we done? you guys are really boring me to death here --
> interest level is pitifully low. yawn.
Pretty long message for someone who's uninterested.
> if you want to see a boot up process that uses daemontools, or runit
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia <
archli...@ishpeck.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:34:28AM -0400, Brandon Watkins wrote:
> > > Can we then agree then that you don't *know* if systemd is stable
> > > enough to be used (in general, not only by you)?
>
> > >
14 matches
Mail list logo