On 09/10/12 at 04:20am, John Hutchison wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:29:22AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > I have /dev/sda1 root, /dev/sda2 swap and /dev/sda3 /home. So this is not
> > a single partition setup but a three partition setup if you count swap.
> Assume for this that /dev/sda
On 09/10/2012 06:03 PM, Nelson Marambio wrote:
Am 10.09.2012 23:56, schrieb Randy:
On 09/10/2012 02:51 PM, Daniel Pirek wrote:
iirc i mounted my windows shares with WORKGROUP\\Username ,
have you tried that ?
Pi
Randy wrote:
On 09/09/2012 09:36 PM, rafael ff1 wrote:
2012/9/9 Randy :
In
Hi,
see https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/31460.
Ondřej
On 10.9.2012 23:06, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys, Guillaume,
Do you know if the recent depends bump in swt is do to an actual
break in compatibility with java-runtime 6.x or was it just do to a
package support issue? The PKGBUILD was up
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Squall Lionheart
wrote:
> I have renamed and moved this project to github for those interested.
> Thank you for all your help and I have applied most of the suggestions so
> far as well as made further improvements.
>
> https://github.com/headmastersquall/caatinga
Am 10.09.2012 23:56, schrieb Randy:
On 09/10/2012 02:51 PM, Daniel Pirek wrote:
iirc i mounted my windows shares with WORKGROUP\\Username ,
have you tried that ?
Pi
Randy wrote:
On 09/09/2012 09:36 PM, rafael ff1 wrote:
2012/9/9 Randy :
In the past I have been able to mount my Windows c
On 09/10/2012 02:51 PM, Daniel Pirek wrote:
iirc i mounted my windows shares with WORKGROUP\\Username ,
have you tried that ?
Pi
Randy wrote:
On 09/09/2012 09:36 PM, rafael ff1 wrote:
2012/9/9 Randy :
In the past I have been able to mount my Windows computer using the
following command:
"
I was away for a few days but this evening returned and updated a
laptop which has ipw2200 wireless - and the updates included
NetworkManager 0.9.6 - after rebooting the machine the wireless
connection fails within seconds - despite ifconfig and ifconfig
showing a normal connection - this is for a
Guys, Guillaume,
Do you know if the recent depends bump in swt is do to an actual break in
compatibility with java-runtime 6.x or was it just do to a package support
issue? The PKGBUILD was updated a couple of days ago to:
-depends=('java-runtime>=6' 'gtk2>=2.20.1' 'libxtst')
+depends=('jav
iirc i mounted my windows shares with WORKGROUP\\Username ,
have you tried that ?
Pi
Randy wrote:
>On 09/09/2012 09:36 PM, rafael ff1 wrote:
>> 2012/9/9 Randy :
>>> In the past I have been able to mount my Windows computer using the
>>> following command:
>>>
>>> "mount -t cifs -o username=USE
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:23:27PM +0100, Stephen Martin wrote:
> Is /Users a valid share on your system?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 10 Sep 2012, at 02:25, Randy wrote:
>
> >
> > In the past I have been able to mount my Windows computer using the
> > following command:
> >
> > "mount -t
I have renamed and moved this project to github for those interested.
Thank you for all your help and I have applied most of the suggestions so
far as well as made further improvements.
https://github.com/headmastersquall/caatinga
--
Yesterday is history.
Tomorrow is a mystery.
Today is a gift.
Is /Users a valid share on your system?
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Sep 2012, at 02:25, Randy wrote:
>
> In the past I have been able to mount my Windows computer using the following
> command:
>
> "mount -t cifs -o username=USERNAME,password=PASSWORD
> //192.168.1.107/Users/gumper /mnt/share
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Randy wrote:
>
> In the past I have been able to mount my Windows computer using the
> following command:
>
> "mount -t cifs -o username=USERNAME,password=PASSWORD
> //192.168.1.107/Users/gumper /mnt/share/"
>
> Now when I try this I receive the message:
>
> "Unabl
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 09:57:06PM -0400, Randy wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 09:36 PM, rafael ff1 wrote:
> >2012/9/9 Randy :
> >>In the past I have been able to mount my Windows computer using the
> >>following command:
> >>
> >>"mount -t cifs -o username=USERNAME,password=PASSWORD
> >>//192.168.1.107/Us
According to Thomas Bächler:
Let me also express part of my personal opinion, which others might
disagree with: If you wanted high quality software, why did you install
GRUB? If you want a decent bootloader, use syslinux.
Actually, at least from where I'm sitting, this "personal opinion" has a
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:29:22AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I have /dev/sda1 root, /dev/sda2 swap and /dev/sda3 /home. So this is not
> a single partition setup but a three partition setup if you count swap.
Assume for this that /dev/sda is the bootloader _AND_ the device. As was
said before
Am 10.09.2012 10:12, schrieb Jude DaShiell:
> I had intended to install grub into mbr on /dev/sda1. I used
> --target=i386-pc as provided in the grub-install step and did so with
> misgivings since the machine I use is an x86-64 machine. The only x86-64
> target on the arch beginner's guide wa
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Bjoern Franke wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I had intended to install grub into mbr on /dev/sda1. I used
> > --target=i386-pc as provided in the grub-install step and did so with
> > misgivings since the machine I use is an x86-64 machine. The only x86-64
> > target on the arch b
>
> I had intended to install grub into mbr on /dev/sda1. I used
> --target=i386-pc as provided in the grub-install step and did so with
> misgivings since the machine I use is an x86-64 machine. The only x86-64
> target on the arch beginner's guide was for ufi not bios. A bug like this
>
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, Curtis Shimamoto wrote:
> On 09/09/12 at 11:15pm, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > I am learning more about my hardware doing an archlinux installation on an
> > amd k8 athelon system. Apparently grub won't work without use of
> > blocklists and it complains that blocklists are unre
20 matches
Mail list logo
