[arch-general] Mailing list closed for 24 hours

2012-09-26 Thread Allan McRae
I am invoking the easy way to end flamewars... This mailing list will be shut down for the next 24 hours. Any messages sent to the list will go to /dev/null. Once the list is reinstated, I will automatically ban any person who sends an email that is not asking for help or providing help. Allan

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-26 Thread Allan McRae
On 26/09/12 20:39, Heiko Baums wrote: > See also Denis' blog to which he sent a link in his last e-mail. Fact checking needed especially since it was the developer you were replying to whose blog post that actually was. Allan

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-26 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:28:20 +0200 schrieb Thomas Bächler : > This is not about opinions at all. No, this is about opinions. Well, not only about opinions, also or rather about personal experience. > Everything useful that is to say about this topic has been said. All > that can be added are fla

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-26 Thread Simon Perry
On 26/09/12, Kevin Chadwick wrote: | Double standards, considering what can only be described as anti | anti-systemd users sending more 100% pointless and inflammatory mails | and first with no threats of being top or part of the rediculous idea of | a block list. Nah, I'm just a fanboy apparentl

[arch-general] courier-maildrop package failed installation

2012-09-26 Thread Jude DaShiell
I tried that delivery agent and authgen library failed to install and later I couldn't get it started. Fortunately procmail posed no similar problems on installation. Is courier-maildrop not supported for amd64 k8 athelon machines? If that's the case that would explain this failure. I can i

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 22.09.2012 16:20, schrieb Heiko Baums: > Am Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:06:28 +0200 > schrieb Thomas Bächler : > >> After the recent outbreaks, we have been discussing banning people >> from arch-general. At the time, the people we talked about had calmed >> down and everything went back to normal, so

Re: [arch-general] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

2012-09-26 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> It takes two to tango. Perhaps you need a reminder of the fair and > balanced critique Heiko initially offered, based on a package in > [testing], that has not made it to [core]: > > https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2012-September/031151.html Double standards, considering wh

Re: [arch-general] ABS and pacman

2012-09-26 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Zeke Sulastin wrote: >> Many times these tweaks are temporary and, indeed, newer versions make >> them unnecessary. It can definitely be done as you suggest, but I think >> it'd be in the spirit of the help provided by, e.g., .pacsave and .pacnew >> files, to have

Re: [arch-general] [seamonkey] Update is strongly required

2012-09-26 Thread Ionut Biru
On 09/25/2012 09:57 PM, Christopher Reimer wrote: > Ohh, I missed that. Sorry for the noise. > Am 25.09.2012 20:01 schrieb "Karol Blazewicz" : > >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Christopher Reimer >> wrote: >>> I've already written this to the bugtracker. There I was told to post it >> here: