Hi,
The description for FS#26200 is not truncated here, and the bug
history shows no changes to the description.
Is this only a problem with a specific browser?
--
Best regards,
Alexander Rødseth
xyproto / TU
I'm talking about stuff from https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Bug_Day/2012
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The description for FS#26200 is not truncated here, and the bug
> history shows no changes to the description.
> Is this only a problem with a specif
On 12/11/12 16:41, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> Why are some bug descriptions truncated?
>
> Is:
> FS#26200 - [gnome-control-center] 3.2.0-1 does not show any items when used
>
> Should be:
> FS#26200 - [gnome-control-center] 3.2.0-1 does not show any items when
> used with LXDE
>
> https://bugs.arc
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> It is a wiki... fix it.
Sure, but it would be nice to find out what went wrong in the first place.
Like the subject says, when I boot directly into single user mode,
system doesn't load my LVM volumes. So the only way I can realistically
use single user mode (since many of my key files are on LVM volumes) is
to boot the system to multi-user mode, and the "telinit s" to drop back
down to sin
Am 12.11.2012 16:28, schrieb David Rosenstrauch:
> Like the subject says, when I boot directly into single user mode,
> system doesn't load my LVM volumes. So the only way I can realistically
> use single user mode (since many of my key files are on LVM volumes) is
> to boot the system to multi-us
Is there a reason why a DNS server needs to be built against a version of
the boost graph library, which is designed for large-scale distributed,
parallel graph generation[1] for the high performance computing world?
This doesn't come across as being right to me.
[1] http://osl.iu.edu/research/pb
Hi,
2012/11/12 Kevin Mihelich :
> Is there a reason why a DNS server needs to be built against a version of
> the boost graph library, which is designed for large-scale distributed,
> parallel graph generation[1] for the high performance computing world?
> This doesn't come across as being right
I just built the package fine after dropping the hwloc and openmpi
dependencies, removing -lboost_graph_parallel from the CXXFLAGS attached to
make, and removing --with-boost from configure since it was saying it was
invalid anyway (configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-boost).
If this
On 12/11/12 07:41, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> Why are some bug descriptions truncated?
>
> Is:
> FS#26200 - [gnome-control-center] 3.2.0-1 does not show any items when used
>
> Should be:
> FS#26200 - [gnome-control-center] 3.2.0-1 does not show any items when
> used with LXDE
>
> https://bugs.arc
On 12/11/12 12:45, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> It is a wiki... fix it.
>
> Sure, but it would be nice to find out what went wrong in the first place.
>
Oh and my script is here https://github.com/jelly/PyFlySpray
signature.asc
Description:
Hi,
When looking at the output from ./configure --help, there is no
mention of boost at all.
However, even after removing --with-boost, ./configure insists that it
should look for boost, and fails with this message:
./configure: line 16421: syntax error near unexpected token `1.34'
./configure: l
I am building from what is current in trunk, using a clean chroot. I'm also
not saying that it shouldn't depend on boost, I just brought up the
question as to why it depended on the MPI parallelized version of boost
graph, since that unnecessary drug in openmpi as a dep.
On Nov 12, 2012 12:54 PM, "
Now I get what you're saying. Just tried it and will release a new
version of pdns. Thanks.
--
Sincerely,
Alexander Rødseth
xyproto / tu
14 matches
Mail list logo
