Re: [arch-general] No suspend in systemd

2012-12-03 Thread Curtis Shimamoto
On 12/04/12 at 07:25am, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας wrote: > try executing the command as root This is probably a good call. But if you are able to do this as root, I think it means that your session is probably not authenticated. $ loginctl show-session $XDG_SESSION_ID Then make sure your it says "Active=

Re: [arch-general] No suspend in systemd

2012-12-03 Thread Δημήτρης Ζέρβας
try executing the command as root

Re: [arch-general] Secure Boot Support

2012-12-03 Thread Martín Cigorraga
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:51 PM, kristof wrote: Thanks for these insightful read, I will look forward those article.

[arch-general] No suspend in systemd

2012-12-03 Thread Randy
Hello, Whenever I try to suspend my system using the systemd command 'systemctl suspend', it will not suspend and returns the following messages: Failed to issue method call: Operation not supported. Failed to issue method call: Access denied. Any idea what could be causing this to happen? T

[arch-general] Secure Boot Support

2012-12-03 Thread kristof
Now that Matthew Garrett's shim is fully featured and publicly available, will Arch be implementing support for secure boot in the near future? For those who haven't seen the news yet: http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/17542.html and http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/20303.html give a pretty in-depth d

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC] dbus cleanup

2012-12-03 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012, Tom Gundersen wrote: On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: If you merge the two packages, what am I supposed to do? I can't simply remove /usr/bin/dbus-launch and /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/30-dbus 30-dbus will go away, so that's not an issue. That lea

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC] dbus cleanup

2012-12-03 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 23:01:32 +0100 Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: > > If you merge the two packages, what am I supposed > > to do? I can't simply remove /usr/bin/dbus-launch and > > /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/30-dbus > > 30-dbus will go away, so t

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC] dbus cleanup

2012-12-03 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: > If you merge the two packages, what am I supposed > to do? I can't simply remove /usr/bin/dbus-launch and > /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/30-dbus 30-dbus will go away, so that's not an issue. That leaves dbus-launch. I don't see why you wou

Re: [arch-general] rootfs remains in ro at boot on fresh install with new December ISO

2012-12-03 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:00 PM, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT wrote: > Hi, > > I hope it is not caused by the shortcut that I have taken to update my usb > install key from november iso to december iso as described in the other > thread. > > The first symptom that I have observed is that dhcpcd isn'

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC] dbus cleanup

2012-12-03 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:59:47 -0500 "Daniel F. Savarese" wrote: > > In message > , Tom > Gundersen writes: > >I'd like to propose the following change to our two dbus packages: > > > > * make libx11 an optdep in dbus > > * merge dbus-core into dbus > > * move dbus to [core] > > > >This should no

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [RFC] dbus cleanup

2012-12-03 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 03.12.2012 18:59, schrieb Daniel F. Savarese: > For myself, and anyone else administering large numbers of dbus-free systems > (defined as having no running dbus daemons) running Arch Linux (perhaps I'm > the only one?), it adds a maintenance burden. Running unsupported setups is a high mainten

Re: [arch-general] rootfs remains in ro at boot on fresh install with new December ISO

2012-12-03 Thread Dave Reisner
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:00:48PM +, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT wrote: > Hi, > > I hope it is not caused by the shortcut that I have taken to update my usb > install key from november iso to december iso as described in the other > thread. > > The first symptom that I have observed is that

[arch-general] rootfs remains in ro at boot on fresh install with new December ISO

2012-12-03 Thread LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT
Hi, I hope it is not caused by the shortcut that I have taken to update my usb install key from november iso to december iso as described in the other thread. The first symptom that I have observed is that dhcpcd isn't able to update /etc/resolv.conf I am going to provide as much relevant info

Re: [arch-general] [arch-announce] December: time for a new install medium

2012-12-03 Thread LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT
Hi Robbie, > > I know it's not really necessary, but I always like to have the most > up-to-date > Arch live on my toolbox USB stick. Is there a recommended way to update an > existing USB install medium (without overwriting other files?), or should I > just > follow the steps at [1], and update

Re: [arch-general] Last dbus upgrade in testing busting gnome-online-accounts ?

2012-12-03 Thread fredbezies
Don't bother. I finally fixed it. Sorry for my reaction, I was kinda angry by getting disconnection every 2 minutes :( 2012/12/3 fredbezies > > > > 2012/12/3 Ionut Biru > >> On 12/03/2012 07:48 PM, fredbezies wrote: >> > I noticed something strange since last dbus upgrade : my online accounts

Re: [arch-general] Last dbus upgrade in testing busting gnome-online-accounts ?

2012-12-03 Thread fredbezies
2012/12/3 Ionut Biru > On 12/03/2012 07:48 PM, fredbezies wrote: > > I noticed something strange since last dbus upgrade : my online accounts > > keeps on expiring. > > > > I try to delete and recreate my online account, but after one or two > > minutes, I got a message that "an online account ne

Re: [arch-general] Last dbus upgrade in testing busting gnome-online-accounts ?

2012-12-03 Thread Ionut Biru
On 12/03/2012 07:48 PM, fredbezies wrote: > I noticed something strange since last dbus upgrade : my online accounts > keeps on expiring. > > I try to delete and recreate my online account, but after one or two > minutes, I got a message that "an online account needs attention". > > Got this in m