On 12/04/2012 04:31 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Randy wrote:
Hello,
Whenever I try to suspend my system using the systemd command 'systemctl
suspend', it will not suspend and returns the following messages:
Failed to issue method call: Operation not supported.
Fail
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:41:58 -0800, Christoph Vigano
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04.12.2012 10:27, Thomas Bächler wrote:
If any Arch developer were to magically receive a new, secure-boot
secured computer, then we could quickly get shim support.
Well, I'm no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04.12.2012 10:27, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> If any Arch developer were to magically receive a new, secure-boot
> secured computer, then we could quickly get shim support.
>
Well, I'm not an Arch developer, but as it happens I got myself a
Thinkpa
Hi Olivier,
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:46 PM, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT
wrote:
> Since I didn't want a tmpfs mounted in /tmp, I did follow directives from the
> Beginners guide:
>
> systemctl mask tmp.mount
>
> The result of that thing is:
>
> 1. rootfs is ro.
>
> 2. My disk partition for /tmp spe
Dave, Tom,
Thank you very much for your explanations. With your help, I have become a
little bit less clueless about systemd and Arch initramfs system.
by typing systemctl status /, the reported status was ok/mounted with some
green on the output. Nothing special to report about that. I wish th
On 12/04/2012 01:02 AM, Curtis Shimamoto wrote:
On 12/04/12 at 07:25am, Δημήτρης Ζέρβας wrote:
try executing the command as root
This is probably a good call. But if you are able to do this as root, I
think it means that your session is probably not authenticated.
$ loginctl show-session $XDG
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Randy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Whenever I try to suspend my system using the systemd command 'systemctl
> suspend', it will not suspend and returns the following messages:
>
> Failed to issue method call: Operation not supported.
> Failed to issue method call: Access den
Am 04.12.2012 02:51, schrieb kristof:
> Now that Matthew Garrett's shim is fully featured and publicly
> available, will Arch be implementing support for secure boot in the near
> future?
There is one showstopper to this: To my knowledge, not a single Arch
developer or trusted user has a machine t
8 matches
Mail list logo