[2012-12-14 16:41:44 +0100] arnaud gaboury:
> As I am not in the IT industry, I thought I could benefit from the
> community user experiences. That's the way I understand the community
> notion.
Sure, but unless you have more specific requirements, the wiki is the
most suited community resource av
On 12/14/2012 04:50 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> On Thursday 13 Dec 2012 15:53:32 Bryan wrote:
>> I double checked with Trond and he agrees that we shouldn't defer the flush
>> because that would cause us to hold the file open for longer than we really
>> should (and it would make NFS sillyrenames
On Friday 14 Dec 2012 12:51:20 arnaud gaboury wrote:
> I plan to virtualize a Arch server on my Arch box.
what i don't understand is why you want to take the extra step of
virtualization?
you can as well run web- and other servers on your main arch
instance. re. security, just have them listen
On Dec 14, 2012 1:21 PM, "Gaetan Bisson" wrote:
>
> [2012-12-14 12:51:20 +0100] arnaud gaboury:
> > I want to set up a http web server @ home to practice.
> > I plan to virtualize a Arch server on my Arch box.
>
> So you want to run a Web server inside a virtual machine?
>
> > -container for my se
[2012-12-14 12:51:20 +0100] arnaud gaboury:
> I want to set up a http web server @ home to practice.
> I plan to virtualize a Arch server on my Arch box.
So you want to run a Web server inside a virtual machine?
> -container for my servlets : Tomcat ?
> -secure ftp server : ???
> maybe a mail ser
On 14/12/12 19:37, Rodrigo Rivas wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Robbie Smith wrote:
On 14/12/12 01:04, Neil Perry wrote:
On 13 December 2012 13:52, Robbie Smith wrote:
vipw and vigr don't seem to do anything for me. It doesn't matter what
changes I make, they both report that n
On 14/12/12 19:37, Rodrigo Rivas wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Robbie Smith wrote:
On 14/12/12 01:04, Neil Perry wrote:
On 13 December 2012 13:52, Robbie Smith wrote:
vipw and vigr don't seem to do anything for me. It doesn't matter what
changes I make, they both report that n
On Thursday 13 Dec 2012 15:53:32 Bryan wrote:
> I double checked with Trond and he agrees that we shouldn't defer the flush
> because that would cause us to hold the file open for longer than we really
> should (and it would make NFS sillyrenames more difficult, too).
I thought that's why the "noc
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Robbie Smith wrote:
> On 14/12/12 01:04, Neil Perry wrote:
>
>> On 13 December 2012 13:52, Robbie Smith wrote:
>>
>> vipw and vigr don't seem to do anything for me. It doesn't matter what
>>> changes I make, they both report that nothing was changed.
>>>
>>> # v
9 matches
Mail list logo
