Hi,
I used to rely on xautolock + community/vlock for locking my X session,
core/kbd however removed community/vlock in favor of its own vlock which lack
the functionality I need. Besides -a
-a,--all
Lock all console sessions and disable VC switching.
not working
This t
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Dennis Herbrich wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:21:12AM +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > I was thereafter happy to log into my system, with no kernel panic !
> > I decided to reinstall all packages from the "broken" upgrade.
> >
> > Nevertheless, everything is
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:32:43AM +0100, Dennis Herbrich wrote:
> by pacman -Ql|cut -d' ' -f2.
--quiet is our friend
pacman -Qlq
On 24 January 2013 16:27, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> On Thursday 24 Jan 2013 11:05:22 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> > +1 to drop vi. I cannot imagine why someone would want to use this crap
> ...
> >
> > We already have nano in [core], so I think that vim could stay in
> > [extra] (do we really nee
Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> Le 2013-01-24 07:21, Allan McRae a écrit :
>> On 24/01/13 22:08, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
>>> === [core] ===
>>>
>>> For [core], there are two uneeded orphans, that also aren't make
>>> dependencies for any other [core] packages:
>>>
>>> openldap
>>> vi
>>>
>>> If I ma
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:32:46PM -0600, William Giokas wrote:
> All,
>
> I rebooted my computer today to test some boot flags only to be greeted
> with an unbootable machine. Here is a transcript of the boot messages:
>
>
> /init: line 9: systemd-timestamp: not found
> :: running early hook [u
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:35:29AM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 24 Jan 2013 11:05:22 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> > > +1 to drop vi. I cannot imagine why someone would want to use this crap
> > ...
> > >
> > > We already h
Hi
You know the moment where you would turn back the time some seconds only? Well
here we are...
I got a perfectly running arch on ssd (6 partitions) and an internal hdd
(1partition) with a backup usb disk (1partition) connected at a very genious
moment! Having done a SD-multiboot setup with s
All,
I rebooted my computer today to test some boot flags only to be greeted
with an unbootable machine. Here is a transcript of the boot messages:
/init: line 9: systemd-timestamp: not found
:: running early hook [udev]
/init: line 21: udevd: not found
:: running hook [udev]
:: Triggering ueven
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:21:12 +0100
arnaud gaboury wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:25:16 +0100, Thomas Bächler
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Am 23.01.2013 11:10, schrieb arnaud gaboury:
> >>
> >>> Let me clarify a few things.
> >>> 1- I didn't
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> On Thursday 24 Jan 2013 11:05:22 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> > +1 to drop vi. I cannot imagine why someone would want to use this crap
> ...
> >
> > We already have nano in [core], so I think that vim could stay in
> > [extra] (do we rea
On Thursday 24 Jan 2013 11:05:22 Stéphane Gaudreault wrote:
> +1 to drop vi. I cannot imagine why someone would want to use this crap ...
>
> We already have nano in [core], so I think that vim could stay in
> [extra] (do we really need 2 text editors in [core] ?).
Vi is the standard UNIX text-ed
Accidentally sent this too soon; keyboard-shortcut-fail!
On Thursday 24 Jan 2013 10:37:55 you wrote:
> I'm pretty confident I could tackle breakage, but I still avoid [testing]
> because I use my system for work, and troubleshooting these problems will
> usually take time that I can't justify. Br
On Thursday 24 Jan 2013 10:21:12 arnaud gaboury wrote:
> I am always scare each time I run #pacman -Syu, as I know it could be
> tricky. I usually pay very much attention, and this particular upgrade was
> my first real issue leaving me with a broken system.
> I may think breaking/fixing our system
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:21:12AM +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> I was thereafter happy to log into my system, with no kernel panic !
> I decided to reinstall all packages from the "broken" upgrade.
>
> Nevertheless, everything is not fine. Somme apps are broken, and do not
> know why. I guess it
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:25:16 +0100, Thomas Bächler
> wrote:
>
>> Am 23.01.2013 11:10, schrieb arnaud gaboury:
>>
>>> Let me clarify a few things.
>>> 1- I didn't correctly understand the post from Allan about toolchain,
>>> thus
>>> my brock
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jameson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Jameson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Jameson wrote:
>>>
I hope someone can help me. I have a server with two SSDs that
conta
17 matches
Mail list logo
