Re: [arch-general] Default directory for extra modules

2013-02-19 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 09:41 +0100, Sergi Pons Freixes wrote: > Hi All, > > I have the vanilla and the PAE kernels installed, and I use latter as my > default for booting. I installed tp_smapi, and the modules are placed on > /usr/lib/modules/extramodules-3.7-ARCH/ instead of > /usr/lib/modules/ext

[arch-general] A question about handling a system with two wired network interfaces?

2013-02-19 Thread Mike Cloaked
I have a system with two ethernet sockets on the motherboard, and I have until very recently been finding that my network at random failed to come up during the boot process. I have the ethernet cable plugged into only one of the two sockets, and assign the names to the interfaces as eno1 and eno2

Re: [arch-general] A question about handling a system with two wired network interfaces?

2013-02-19 Thread Tom Gundersen
Hi Mike, On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Mike Cloaked wrote: > I have a system with two ethernet sockets on the motherboard, and I have > until very recently been finding that my network at random failed to come > up during the boot process. Just to be clear: the problem is still occurring (I a

Re: [arch-general] Linux-3.7.3-1-i686 blank screen

2013-02-19 Thread Whiskers
I've been trying again with the latest kernel, 3.7.9-1-i686. My logs are now showing what looks like a possible clue; here's what I think is the interesting part of /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old for my last attempt to boot using that kernel: [ 1426.786] (II) NOUVEAU(0): NVLeaveVT is called. [ 1426.78

Re: [arch-general] A question about handling a system with two wired network interfaces?

2013-02-19 Thread Mike Cloaked
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: Just to be clear: the problem is still occurring (I am confused by > "until recently")? Was it brought on by the recent udev naming change, > or is it a long-standing problem? > This is a new system that was installed very recently using the

Re: [arch-general] A question about handling a system with two wired network interfaces?

2013-02-19 Thread Mike Cloaked
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Mike Cloaked wrote: > >> I will check which of the two is enabled - but I have since my last post > now switched on dhcpd (server) and named services - after boot the dhcpd > service had entered a failed state and I am now wondering if I need to add > the systemd-

Re: [arch-general] A question about handling a system with two wired network interfaces?

2013-02-19 Thread Mike Cloaked
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Mike Cloaked wrote: > > > So the dhcpd4 service is fast compared to the NetworkManager service. > > I know this discussion is now about the incorrect start of dhcpd4 - I can move this to a new topic title if necessary. However I looked at journalctl for the lines

Re: [arch-general] A question about handling a system with two wired network interfaces?

2013-02-19 Thread Tom Gundersen
Hi Mike, Lots of stuff going on, so sorry for not answering inline. * It looks like NetworkManager and dhcpd are stepping on eachother's toes. Maybe you want to disable dhcpd and only use NM? * Any service that cannot deal with network devices appearing or being rename after it is started (is b

Re: [arch-general] UTC

2013-02-19 Thread Tuxce
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:50:06 +0100 "Ralf Mardorf" wrote: > Hi :) > > after a reboot there always is an offset of -3600 sec, when running > ntpdate. > > # timedatectl status | grep local > RTC in local TZ: yes > Warning: The RTC is configured to maintain time in the local time > zone. Th

Re: [arch-general] UTC

2013-02-19 Thread Kwpolska
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:40:10 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> >>> # timedatectl set-local-rtc 1 >>> Failed to issue method call: Input/output error >> >> >> That message is disconcerting (at least the error message should have >> been clearer)

Re: [arch-general] UTC

2013-02-19 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:02:54 +0100 Kwpolska wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Ralf Mardorf > wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:40:10 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >>> > >>> # timedatectl set-local-rtc 1 > >>> Failed to issue method call: Input/output error > >> > >> > >> That message is

Re: [arch-general] linux-tools-meta, why?

2013-02-19 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Brock.Zheng wrote: > Hi all > >I found that package in community, >The pkg has no content. The only file in it's pkg is >a .PKGINFO file: > >$> tar -tf > archlinux/community/os/x86_64/linux-tools-meta-3.8-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz >.PKGINFO > >An

[arch-general] [solved] UTC

2013-02-19 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:46:08 +0100, Tuxce wrote: On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:50:06 +0100 "Ralf Mardorf" wrote: # cat /etc/adjtime LOCAL That's why timedatectl command fails, LOCAL must be on the line 3 : $ cat /etc/adjtime 0.0 0 0 0 LOCAL Thank you :) [root@archlinux etc]# cat adjtime LOCAL [