On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 15:26 +0100, Delcypher wrote:
> should be down to the user and not the distro (yes I'm aware I could
> compile boost myself... that's what I'm doing right now but what
> happened to "Keep it Simple"? If I wanted to compile loads of stuff
> from scratch I'd be using Gentoo).
>
On 2013-29-09, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> If we were to use git, we should have one git repository per
> package, and also provide one repository which includes all
> the packages as submodules.
Why not use one branch per package and one branch per repository
with the packages as submodules instead o
Sorry, I'm not really able to help with startx stuff. It hasn't worked
for me since about 2007 or so. It seems pretty involved these days to
get it working. I've just been starting and stopping the display
manager, which is quite easy using systemd.
sudo systemctl start gdm
sudo systemctl stop gd
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:18:39 -0400
Michael Dahlberg wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 20:59:02 -0400
> > Michael Dahlberg wrote:
> >
> > > I recently upgraded to systemd-207 and I'm having some problems using
> > > netctl to bring up a brid
I am trying to edit the xinitrc file so that when I type startx,
Gnome will start. It seems that something has gone wrong with
the drivers, because I get a result that I need to get
information from a log file. I have the link here:
Were 1920.266]
XddOrg X Server 1.14.3
Release Date: 2013-09-
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 20:59:02 -0400
> Michael Dahlberg wrote:
>
> > I recently upgraded to systemd-207 and I'm having some problems using
> > netctl to bring up a bridged interface during the system boot. The
> problem
> > is that systemd wi
On Sep 29, 2013 12:32 PM, "Hunter Jozwiak" wrote:
>
> I went into the directory /etc/skel/ and have erased the comment lines
off of exect gnome-session
It's really unclear what you're trying to do here. Please be more specific.
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 20:59:02 -0400
Michael Dahlberg wrote:
> I recently upgraded to systemd-207 and I'm having some problems using
> netctl to bring up a bridged interface during the system boot. The problem
> is that systemd will try and bring the bridged interface up before bringing
> up the a
Hi guys:
I've installed Gnome and I don't really want to run it from the
GDM. So, I went into the directory /etc/skel/ and have erased
the comment lines off of exect gnome-session. When I type
startx, and press alt+F2 to run and type Orca, nothing seems to
happen.
Also, I have the VirtualBo
On Sun 29 Sep 2013 at 17:33, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In connection with the newly created TODO lists for rebuilds of
> packages formerly maintained by people that are no longer involved
> with Arch Linux, I wondered if there would be any objections if I
> moved the following packages fr
Hi,
2013/9/29 Gaetan Bisson :
> This belongs to arch-dev-public. Not all developers and trusted users
> follow arch-general, but we are all expected to read arch-dev-public.
> Please repost it there in full.
>
> Also, please send two separate messages, one for each of your two points
> above, sinc
[2013-09-29 17:33:52 +0200] Alexander Rødseth:
> In connection with the newly created TODO lists for rebuilds of
> packages formerly maintained by people that are no longer involved
> with Arch Linux, I wondered if there would be any objections if I
> moved the following packages from [community] t
[2013-09-29 17:33:52 +0200] Alexander Rødseth:
> As I gather, we all like git better than svn, for a long list of
> reasons. Are there any objections to switching over from svn to git as
> repositories for the official packages?
The reason to stick with SVN has always been that certain devs/TUs wa
Oops, wqy-microhei-lite and zsync were added by me but I forgot to adopt them.
Thanks for the TODO list and I've just adopted the two poor guys :P
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> My last reply was flippant. Apologies for that.
Huhh I didn't realise clang used LLVM as a shard library.
I guess my perspective is slightly skewed because I work on another LLVM
based project that uses static libraries instead (the project uses an
old version LLVM).
>
> However, I don't see
Hi,
--- Orphans ---
In connection with the newly created TODO lists for rebuilds of
packages formerly maintained by people that are no longer involved
with Arch Linux, I wondered if there would be any objections if I
moved the following packages from [community] to AUR: (They are
currently unnee
16 matches
Mail list logo
