Re: [arch-general] SELinux packages status update

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Timothée Ravier wrote: > * pam:rebuild '--enable-selinux' flag for Linux-PAM, patch for > pam_unix2, which only removes a function already > implemented in a library elsewhere. Is there an > upstream here? I couldn'

[arch-general] can't locally sign Siosm key selinux

Hi *Timothée Ravier*, I tried locally signing your key. But this is what I get pacman-key --lsign-key C8D83B6AE4B8685A7290545FDB27818F78688F83 -> Locally signing key C8D83B6AE4B8685A7290545FDB27818F78688F83... ==> ERROR: C8D83B6AE4B8685A7290545FDB27818F78688F83 could not be locally signed. But

Re: [arch-general] SELinux packages status update

2013/11/3 Timothée Ravier > Hi, > > I've updated all the SELinux related packages in the AUR. I've changed > most packages names to better fit with upstream names and AUR naming > policy (selinux-pam -> pam-selinux; selinux-usr-libselinux -> > libselinux). I'll keep the old ones a week or two, ju

Re: [arch-general] systemd --test

(Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 07:57:04AM -0800) John Davis : > Hello Folks, > > I believe you want to run systemctl instead of systemd. The archwiki entry > on systemd is very well written. The parameters to systemctl are given > with examples. No, it is a systemd command and not a systemctl command (A

Re: [arch-general] systemd --test

At 11/4/2013 10:43 AM, you wrote: >On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Wayne S wrote: >> my apologies for improperly sending email to list. >> >> My question is how to properly use systemd --test: >> >> From the website: >> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TipsAndTricks/ >> >> It sug