I, too, would like to chime in and say a big THANK YOU to everyone making
Arch what it is. I started getting into Linux during my first year at
university, and a colleague of mine recommended Arch. After using Ubuntu
for a while on my new netbook I decided to try Arch, and I've loved it ever
since.
On 01/06/2014 07:21 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> The current Arch box (hostname phoinix) is a fully updated box (as of
> 1/6/14)
> with:
>
> # smbd --version
> Version 3.6.7
Sorry, grabbed the wrong xterm. The current is:
[18:25 phoinix:/etc/samba] # smbd -V
Version 4.1.3
--
David C. Rank
Guys,
Something in current Archlinux prevents clients mounting a root samba share
'/' via mount.cifs.
Since building a new Arch server a month or so ago, I have been chasing an
issue with mount.cifs that prevents the '/' share from being mounted as it
always has. This has worked (and continue
I'm just another VERY HAPPY Arch Linux user, but I encourage you all to show
your support for the people behind Arch in concrete ways too, to keep this
project alive and well. The following links are from the Arch Linux home page,
under "Support":
Donate: https://www.archlinux.org/donate/
A
On 01/06/2014 03:07 PM, Alper Kanat wrote:
> Hey Kyle,
>
> Yes, I'm aware of DigitalOcean. Since many years, I used to have my own
> server running Arch on Hetzner and now on DigitalOcean. I used to host my
> ex-company's servers on Hetzner which were again Arch boxes. I personally
> think that Arc
Alper Kanat writes:
---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---
>
> I do my best to spread the word btw. Hopefully Arch will be the next big
> thing in Linux world some day. :)
>
---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---
Well, IMHO, after hopping countless distros since '99,
Hey Kyle,
Yes, I'm aware of DigitalOcean. Since many years, I used to have my own
server running Arch on Hetzner and now on DigitalOcean. I used to host my
ex-company's servers on Hetzner which were again Arch boxes. I personally
think that Arch has the best package manager in Linux world.
I now
Thank you for making Arch the great distro it is !
I've been a desktop user for a while but finally decided to install Arch on
a server.
2014/1/6 Kyle
> According to Alper Kanat:
> # I wish Arch was supported officially on things like AWS and other server
> # infrastructures. It's clearly my fav
According to Alper Kanat:
# I wish Arch was supported officially on things like AWS and other server
# infrastructures. It's clearly my favourite distro for many years. But it's
# pretty heartbreaking to see that its support is only community driven.
This is still true on the most wellknown infras
From my UNIX user point of view, there is no distribution closer to the
UNIX philosophy than Arch Linux. Lightweight, simple and yet powerful,
this distribution serves the UNIX and GNU/Linux purposes better than any
other. No frills all around the kernel, no shiny and useless packages
upon inst
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 22:11 +0200, Alper Kanat wrote:
> I wish Arch was supported officially on things like AWS and other server
> infrastructures. It's clearly my favourite distro for many years. But it's
> pretty heartbreaking to see that its support is only community driven.
>
>
> ---
> Quis c
Here are my 4 Cents,
Arch is the only completely stable Linux distro on my machine.
It provides the most packages for my audio needs.
It's the distro on my machine, which doesn't cause a dependency hell,
when compiling from upstream.
And last but not least, it provides the best package manageme
I wish Arch was supported officially on things like AWS and other server
infrastructures. It's clearly my favourite distro for many years. But it's
pretty heartbreaking to see that its support is only community driven.
---
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Mike Cloa
May I add my thanks to all the developers and maintainers for making
ArchLinux the excellent distribution that it is. I converted all my
machines to Arch over the past couple of years, and I value the philosophy,
the up-to-datedness, and the speedy and efficient package management, as
well as the
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Genes Lists wrote:
>
>
> Over the last 2 weeks I have replaced 3 fedora servers with Arch - and want
> to say thank you . That's the last of my fedora machines now and I am all
> Arch and they are all working really well.
>
> The new boxes are haswell UEFI and bo
Over the last 2 weeks I have replaced 3 fedora servers with Arch - and
want to say thank you . That's the last of my fedora machines now and I
am all Arch and they are all working really well.
The new boxes are haswell UEFI and boot using refind. Setting this up
was straightforward with Arc
I'm sorry. My idea now seems much worse (and it wouldn't be worth
implementing it).
Regards, and thanks for your time,
Kalrish
On Jan 6, 2014 8:11 AM, "Rashif Ray Rahman" wrote:
> On 6 January 2014 09:26, Kalrish Bäakjen wrote:
> > Note, however, that the model I propose wouldn't introduce many
On Sunday 05 Jan 2014 23:03:23 Mark Lee wrote:
> This all boils down to what does Arch consider a bug. If code that
> cannot be compiled in parallel is a bug then Arch should make parallel
> building the default (since these are bugs that upstream should fix). If
> instead it is not a bug but is th
18 matches
Mail list logo
