On 15 January 2014 07:39, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> All,
>
> Updating different minimum dependency package version info for tde
> PKGBUILDs,
> I note there have been a number of 'version number format' changes for various
> packages. E.g.:
>
> filesystem 0.x.y-z ==> 2013.05-2
This has been the
On 14 January 2014 18:04, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> They're kept neatly tucked out of the way in /usr/lib/ruby, except for a few
> wrappers that end up in /usr/bin so that they're in the PATH.
You use your system as you wish, but that is not recommended/supported
practice. You can use other direc
I was wondering why connman conflicts with openresolv. Looking through
the files in each package, there don't seem to be any in common. So I
figure there must be something that I am missing or just completely
unaware of.
I am primarily a connman user, but I use connman-git from the AUR, both
bec
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:39 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> All,
>
> Updating different minimum dependency package version info for tde
> PKGBUILDs,
> I note there have been a number of 'version number format' changes for various
> packages. E.g.:
>
> filesystem 0.x.y-z ==> 2013.05-2
> usbutils 0
All,
Updating different minimum dependency package version info for tde PKGBUILDs,
I note there have been a number of 'version number format' changes for various
packages. E.g.:
filesystem 0.x.y-z ==> 2013.05-2
usbutils 0.x.y-z ==> 006-1
There is a big difference going from filesystem>=0.7.3
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> On Monday 13 Jan 2014 17:58:59 Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> > I only use a few ruby packages. However, you said it yourself, ruby and
> > pacman both have different uses, my point was: do not change the content
> of
> > a dir managed by pacman
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 23:37 +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Mark Lee wrote:
> > Salutations,
> >
> > Pardon me but does anyone know how mirrors are synced and flagged out of
> > date?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mark
> >
> > --
> > Mark Lee
>
> I don't understand your
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Mark Lee wrote:
> Salutations,
>
> Pardon me but does anyone know how mirrors are synced and flagged out of
> date?
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> --
> Mark Lee
I don't understand your question. What do you mean by 'how'?
https://www.archlinux.org/mirrors/status/
http
Salutations,
Pardon me but does anyone know how mirrors are synced and flagged out of
date?
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Lee
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:58 PM, David C. Rankin <
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 03:26 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > Am I reading this correctly to say - "creating a separate
> out-of-source build
> > directory is no longer required -- even for cmake built packages?" O
On 01/14/2014 03:26 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Am I reading this correctly to say - "creating a separate out-of-source
> build
> directory is no longer required -- even for cmake built packages?" Or am I
> just
> confused again...
WOW,
I confirmed on a smaller build that with VCS packages
All,
Updating PKGBUILDs as specified in VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines, I have a svn based
source that builds with cmake. In the past I have forced out of source building
for all cmake built packages. e.g.:
build() {
cd $srcdir
msg "Creating out-of-source build directory: ${srcdir}/${_builddir}"
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Patrick Burroughs (Celti)
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> [unnecessary babble clipped]
Hi again list,
Just wanted to say that this is partially fixed with 3.12.7 (or
possibly a bit earlier, haven't tested) and the radeon driver: the
screen stays off and nothing short of a r
2014/1/12 Taylor Hornby
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/12/2014 01:56 PM, Kyle Terrien wrote:
> > On 01/12/2014 12:40 PM, Taylor Hornby wrote:
> >>> I guess I just don't understand what happens when I type
> >>> "pacman -S firefox." Does that run the PKGBUILD on my sys
On вто, 14 јан 2014 13:26:15 CET, Allan McRae wrote:
On 14/01/14 22:13, Damjan wrote:
On 13.01.2014 22:52, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 13.01.2014 22:48, schrieb Mark Lee:
Salutations,
All right then; if it works for you guys. Will an announcement be made
on the arch website to ensure the upgrade
On 14/01/14 22:13, Damjan wrote:
> On 13.01.2014 22:52, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Am 13.01.2014 22:48, schrieb Mark Lee:
>>> Salutations,
>>>
>>> All right then; if it works for you guys. Will an announcement be made
>>> on the arch website to ensure the upgrade doesn't break more systems or
>>> wil
I confirm
[killruana@fanstasmic tmp]$ gpg --verify
libgcrypt-1.6.0-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz.sig
gpg: Signature made Mon Dec 16 23:30:48 2013 CET using RSA key ID 0F2A092B
gpg: Good signature from "Andreas Radke "
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no
On 13.01.2014 22:52, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 13.01.2014 22:48, schrieb Mark Lee:
Salutations,
All right then; if it works for you guys. Will an announcement be made
on the arch website to ensure the upgrade doesn't break more systems or
will we continue the wait game and hope that all the mirr
Hello,
I'm having problem with resolv.conf. After booting LiveCD (every version),
sometimes it's empty. Problem occurs when using more than 1 interface and
probably when one of them isn't connected. Mostly it takes place when I'm
booting Arch under ESXi 5.5.0. After running 'dhcpcd' resolv.conf is
On Monday 13 Jan 2014 11:03:32 Bigby James wrote:
> That was how I discovered the multi-version dependencies: As pacman will
> only allow a single version of a package to be installed on the system at a
> given time, I was frequently alerted to "updates" of dependency gems I had
> installed. Middle
On Monday 13 Jan 2014 17:58:59 Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> I only use a few ruby packages. However, you said it yourself, ruby and
> pacman both have different uses, my point was: do not change the content of
> a dir managed by pacman, do so elsewhere. I'm not saying you shouldn't ever
> use both. In t
21 matches
Mail list logo
