On 10.03.14 at 23:30, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > 3: tap0: mtu 1500 qdisc
> >
> ...
>
> > I do not understand why the tap0 profile is listed as DOWN. (# ip link
> > set dev tap0 up does nothing more)
> >
>
> it's not down. it's UP, only NO-CARRIER. but for a tap device you also need
> a user-s
> 3: tap0: mtu 1500 qdisc
>
...
> I do not understand why the tap0 profile is listed as DOWN. (# ip link
> set dev tap0 up does nothing more)
>
it's not down. it's UP, only NO-CARRIER. but for a tap device you also need
a user-space program to handle it.
what do you want to accomplish? do you p
Hello all,
I would like to present my most recent work: arch-wiki-docs-clean [1]. The
package provides pages from the Arch Wiki, optimized for offline browsing,
meaning they contain only the content, all MediaWiki navigation components are
removed.
While I was at it, I have also fixed another bug
Indeed! I like arch linux, now I am more confident about solving the problems.
Thank you all!
Renzhi Cao
Cell: 573-825-8874
Email : rc...@mail.missouri.edu
http://web.missouri.edu/~rcrg4/
From: arch-general on behalf of Emil
Lundberg
Sent: Monday, Ma
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:54:56 +0100
Robert Knauer wrote:
> Hello,
> after the update yesterday (see pacman log at the end of the e-mail),
> netctl hangs when I try to start my network connection with the error
> message:
> > A dependency job for netctl@conn1.service failed. See 'journalctl
> > -xn
Hello,
after the update yesterday (see pacman log at the end of the e-mail),
netctl hangs when I try to start my network connection with the error
message:
> A dependency job for netctl@conn1.service failed. See 'journalctl
> -xn' for details.
The hanging sub-process of netctl seems to be
/usr/bin/
> I don't know how to appreciate all of you, the community. I am so glad to fix
> this problem now. During the process, I have learned a lot of things, and
> become more familiar with arch linux, and also love it more (I always love
> the things more when I get more familiar with). The feeling i
Hi
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:41 AM, ger...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Anatol Pomozov
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks for taking the effort to finally update Apache!
>> >
>> > When trying to start Apache w
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst
> wrote:
> > Thanks for taking the effort to finally update Apache!
> >
> > When trying to start Apache with PHP, I get the same error as Rene.
> >
> > Just to be clear, what is the
Good to hear you got it working! As for some of your earlier questions...
> Thank you for giving suggestions, I have tried the one you suggest, and
> here is the result:
> [...]
> #ls /mnt/sda3
> /boot,dev/,etc/,home/,opt/,lost+found/,proc/,root/,run/,srv/,usr/,var/,sys/.
> [...]
> #mount /d
Hi
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst
wrote:
> Thanks for taking the effort to finally update Apache!
>
> When trying to start Apache with PHP, I get the same error as Rene.
>
> Just to be clear, what is the recommended way to run Apache+PHP now? Will
> mod_php5 will still be sup
Hi,
I am setting up a network for a container.
I have a bridge br0 with a eth adapter "enp7s0" and a tap device "tap0"
***
/etc/netctl/bridge
Description="Bridge connection"
Interface=br0
Connection=bridge
BindsToInterfaces=(enp7s0 tap0)
IP=static
Address='192.168.1.
On 10 March 2014 16:14:07 GMT, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
>On Monday 10 Mar 2014 15:40:13 John WH Smith wrote:
>> By the way, I
>> strongly believe you will fix things faster if you like
>your environment
>> (I assume it is Arch here, of course). Being used to your
>system is much
>> more importa
Hi, Paul:
I have run ls -la /, and I do see /bin->usr/bin, ..., it seems that's a
good news, cheers!
Thank you so much!
Renzhi Cao
Email : rc...@mail.missouri.edu
http://web.missouri.edu/~rcrg4/
From: arch-general on behalf of Paul
Gideon Da
On Monday 10 Mar 2014 16:20:25 Cao, Renzhi wrote:
> Thanks Paul!
>The reason why I copy /bin/* to /mnt/bin is my/mnt/bin is not exists.
> I don't know what happens, it seems this is deleted when I try to fix my
> problem. I will see if my system works well, if not, I will be back again
> :)
Thanks Paul!
The reason why I copy /bin/* to /mnt/bin is my/mnt/bin is not exists. I
don't know what happens, it seems this is deleted when I try to fix my problem.
I will see if my system works well, if not, I will be back again :)
Indeed, I learn a lot and now becomes more confi
On Monday 10 Mar 2014 15:40:13 John WH Smith wrote:
> By the way, I
> strongly believe you will fix things faster if you like
your environment
> (I assume it is Arch here, of course). Being used to your
system is much
> more important than its stability when it comes to your
sysadmin speed
> of
On Monday 10 Mar 2014 15:48:15 Cao, Renzhi wrote:
> I really appreciate Emil Lundberg, Paul Gideon Dann, Temlin Oliv?r, ,
> Guus Snijders' great suggestion, you are right, that's my fault to use
> /dev/mapper/arch_root_image as the root partition, now I can login the
> system,it seems my syst
Hi all:
I really appreciate Emil Lundberg, Paul Gideon Dann, Temlin Oliv?r, ,
Guus Snijders' great suggestion, you are right, that's my fault to use
/dev/mapper/arch_root_image as the root partition, now I can login the
system,it seems my system is working now. There are two things I do t
Hi, Oliver Temlin:
Thank you, it seems my system is working now! Thank you very much!!!
From: arch-general on behalf of Temlin
Olivér
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 9:27 AM
To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
Subject: Re: [arch-general] Cannot re
On 07/03/14 18:09, Ary Kleinerman wrote:
Hi,
I'm a new Archer and I'm planning to install arch linux in a production
server environment, but I have doubts because Arch is a rolling release. My
question is: what does it happen when there are big changes? e.g. changes
in the filesystem or when Arch
On Monday 10 Mar 2014 10:08:06 y...@marupa.net wrote:
> I love Arch, but not for servers. I prefer Debian on my server. Despite all
> the dire warnings given to keep an eye on Arch's web site about certain
> upgrades, its still all too frequent user intervention is necessary where
> nothing is stat
On Mar 10, 2014 4:18 PM, "Cao, Renzhi (MU-Student)"
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I use this system for almost one year, and don't update the system.
I have tried mount /dev/sda3 as the root directory. And I try one thing
before chroot:
> #mkdir /mnt/bin
> #cp /bin/* /mnt/bin
> #arch-chroot /mnt
>
> Now I
Hi,
I use this system for almost one year, and don't update the system. I have
tried mount /dev/sda3 as the root directory. And I try one thing before chroot:
#mkdir /mnt/bin
#cp /bin/* /mnt/bin
#arch-chroot /mnt
Now I can go to the chroot jail. And surprised to me, I run the following
com
On Monday 10 Mar 2014 14:52:23 Cao, Renzhi wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you for giving suggestions, I have tried the one you suggest, and
> here is the result: #ls /mnt/sda2
> boot/,grub/,home/,initramfs-fallback.img,,initramfs.img,lost+fount/,memtest8
> 6+/,syslinux/,vmlinuz-linux #ls /mnt/sda3
> /bo
On Monday, March 10, 2014 10:13:39 AM Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> On Friday 07 Mar 2014 15:09:27 Ary Kleinerman wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a new Archer and I'm planning to install arch linux in a production
> > server environment, but I have doubts because Arch is a rolling release.
> > My
> > question i
Hi,
Thank you for giving suggestions, I have tried the one you suggest, and
here is the result:
#ls /mnt/sda2
boot/,grub/,home/,initramfs-fallback.img,,initramfs.img,lost+fount/,memtest86+/,syslinux/,vmlinuz-linux
#ls /mnt/sda3
/boot,dev/,etc/,home/,opt/,lost+found/,proc/,root/,run/,srv/,usr/
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 06:08:32PM +, Cao, Renzhi (MU-Student) wrote:
I see, so I can continue upgrading the system. This time, I only want to
upgrade the system, and rebuild the kernel. When I need other operations, I
will backup all data first.
I will continue posting, thank you!
Renzhi
Op 10 mrt. 2014 11:20 schreef "Paul Gideon Dann" het
volgende:
>
> On Monday 10 Mar 2014 03:51:04 Cao, Renzhi wrote:
> > Hi, all:
> >
> > I really have no idea for the pacman upgrading fails issue, so I
> > summarize the problem I meet, and the things I try, if any one can give
me
> > suggest
On Monday 10 Mar 2014 03:51:04 Cao, Renzhi wrote:
> Hi, all:
>
> I really have no idea for the pacman upgrading fails issue, so I
> summarize the problem I meet, and the things I try, if any one can give me
> suggestions of what I miss something or I do something wrong, I really
> appreciate,
On Friday 07 Mar 2014 15:09:27 Ary Kleinerman wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm a new Archer and I'm planning to install arch linux in a production
> server environment, but I have doubts because Arch is a rolling release. My
> question is: what does it happen when there are big changes? e.g. changes
> in the fil
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 10:40:27AM -0600, Stephen Martin wrote:
> If you want to use arch in a server environment, you should probably use your
> own repo to be safe.
>
> Have a testing machine be on rolling release. When that machine is stable,
> push its packages to a private repo and update you
32 matches
Mail list logo
