Why use mod_php when you can use PHP-FPM with mod_proxy_fcgi? Works
wonderfully.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am 12.03.2014 00:23, schrieb Eduardo Machado:
> > 2014-03-10 15:21 GMT-03:00 Anatol Pomozov :
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Sebastiaa
Am 12.03.2014 00:23, schrieb Eduardo Machado:
> 2014-03-10 15:21 GMT-03:00 Anatol Pomozov :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks for taking the effort to finally update Apache!
>> >
>> > When trying to start Apache with PHP, I get the same error
2014-03-10 15:21 GMT-03:00 Anatol Pomozov :
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst
> wrote:
> > Thanks for taking the effort to finally update Apache!
> >
> > When trying to start Apache with PHP, I get the same error as Rene.
> >
> > Just to be clear, what is the recommende
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:41 AM, ger...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Anatol Pomozov <
> anatol.pomo...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst
> >> wrote
On 11/03/14 12:54 PM, Maykel Franco wrote:
> Hi, I get this lines in chrome when I moved sidebar the right:
>
> http://es.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=14kbeyw&s=8#.Ux8-xpDuKnk
>
> Can I help me please? Is a bug the chrome?
>
> Thanks in advanced.
>
Looks like a video driver bug, I doubt it's a Chr
2014-03-11 18:02 GMT+01:00 Nowaker :
>> Hi, I get this lines in chrome when I moved sidebar the right:
>>
>> http://es.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=14kbeyw&s=8#.Ux8-xpDuKnk
>
>
> What sidebar? I don't see any in the screenshot.
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Damian Nowak
> StratusHost
> www.AtlasHost.eu
I
>
> OK, so you really just need basic internet connectivity; you don't
> have any special filtering requirements. When you boot the
> container, can it see the enp7s0 interface? That is, is the enp7s0
> interface visible both from the host and from the container?
>
no. On container, I just see hos0
Hi, I get this lines in chrome when I moved sidebar the right:
http://es.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=14kbeyw&s=8#.Ux8-xpDuKnk
What sidebar? I don't see any in the screenshot.
--
Kind regards,
Damian Nowak
StratusHost
www.AtlasHost.eu
Hi, I get this lines in chrome when I moved sidebar the right:
http://es.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=14kbeyw&s=8#.Ux8-xpDuKnk
Can I help me please? Is a bug the chrome?
Thanks in advanced.
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2014 15:45:19 arnaud gaboury wrote:
> The container is dedicated to be a test server for months
before I set
> up a production server (not on my machine this time !). A lot
of web
> services will be hosted on the container.
> The container is a way to test my settings for web a
> I'm not sure what you mean by zero network config. Do you mean you want to
> set up the
> tap interface entirely on the host, along with a static IP, and then the
> container simply
> attaches to that tap device when it boots? I guess that's possible.
yes. But I have a static IP now on contain
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2014 13:06:23 arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > systemd-networkd is still really new. If you're having difficulty with it,
> > I recommend simply using netctl, which is a bit more mature.
>
> I do for part of the setup on host. I am trying to do zero network
> config on container, thus t
>
> systemd-networkd is still really new. If you're having difficulty with it, I
> recommend simply
> using netctl, which is a bit more mature.
I do for part of the setup on host. I am trying to do zero network
config on container, thus the use of networkd. But I can use netctl
inside the contain
Am 11.03.2014 12:02, schrieb Manuel Reimer:
> Thomas Bächler archlinux.org> writes:
>> I quickly went over to gmane and requested subscription of arch-security
>> to gmane, so there is nothing left but to wait.
>
> I hope you didn't request readonly as, if I'm registered to the list with
> the ma
Thomas Bächler archlinux.org> writes:
> I quickly went over to gmane and requested subscription of arch-security
> to gmane, so there is nothing left but to wait.
I hope you didn't request readonly as, if I'm registered to the list with
the mail address, I use from the gmane webinterface, it is p
Am 11.03.2014 11:55, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> Am 11.03.2014 11:52, schrieb Manuel Reimer:
>> Jelle van der Waa vdwaa.nl> writes:
>>> FYI: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2014-
>> March/025952.html
>>
>> Thank you for this information.
>>
>> Am I allowed to ask "gmane.org"
Am 11.03.2014 11:52, schrieb Manuel Reimer:
> Jelle van der Waa vdwaa.nl> writes:
>> FYI: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2014-
> March/025952.html
>
> Thank you for this information.
>
> Am I allowed to ask "gmane.org" to add this list to their archive? This
> would rea
Jelle van der Waa vdwaa.nl> writes:
> FYI: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2014-
March/025952.html
Thank you for this information.
Am I allowed to ask "gmane.org" to add this list to their archive? This
would really help me to get access to this list.
Greetings,
Manuel
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2014 11:06:32 arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > Hi Arnaud, I don't think you need the /etc/netctl/ethernet profile at all.
> > The enp7s0 interface is being absorbed into the bridge, and so should not
> > be considered on its own any more. Otherwise, this looks OK. Are you
> > seeing any
On 03/11/14 at 10:24am, Manuel Reimer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I already flagged the packages out of date, but maybe other people are
> interested, too, that there is a known security hole in udisks/udisks2,
> which has been fixed upstream with new releases:
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/d
Hello,
I already flagged the packages out of date, but maybe other people are
interested, too, that there is a known security hole in udisks/udisks2,
which has been fixed upstream with new releases:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2014-March/001568.html
Greetings,
Manuel
> Hi Arnaud, I don't think you need the /etc/netctl/ethernet profile at all.
> The enp7s0
> interface is being absorbed into the bridge, and so should not be considered
> on its own any
> more. Otherwise, this looks OK. Are you seeing any connectivity problems?
Thank you.
Btw, as I was thinking
On Monday 10 Mar 2014 18:57:38 arnaud gaboury wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am setting up a network for a container.
>
> I have a bridge br0 with a eth adapter "enp7s0" and a tap device "tap0"
>
>
> ***
> /etc/netctl/bridge
> Description="Bridge connection"
> Interface=br0
> Co
> what do you want to accomplish? do you perhaps need a veth device?
>
I want to create a network for a linux container managed by systemd-nspawn.
As Jakub mentioned, the interface is DOWN, thus NO-CARRIER.
24 matches
Mail list logo
