On 03/16/2014 10:21 PM, Kyle Terrien wrote:
> Are you using PulseAudio?
D'oh! I noticed the subject line said "Pulseaudio" right after sending
my message. Sorry for the stupid question.
--Kyle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 03/16/2014 09:59 PM, Mark Lee wrote:
> Salutations,
>
> I recently hooked up a 5.1 surround sound receiver to my Haswell setup
> via HDMI. I used the sound manager in gnome to set the system to output
> 5.1 surround sound. However, while testing each individual speaker using
> the gnome sound s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Salutations,
I recently hooked up a 5.1 surround sound receiver to my Haswell setup
via HDMI. I used the sound manager in gnome to set the system to output
5.1 surround sound. However, while testing each individual speaker using
the gnome sound sett
YOu need to make a /home directory to be used as the mount point for the
/home partition you already have. You won't be able to mount a
filesystem on a directory that doesn't exist. You need an empty /home,
and you will be able to mount the partition there. The genfstab script
will see it mounted a
Why is it necessary to make a new /home directory within the root
system, when a separate /home partition already exists?
--
digest-mode subscriber; please cc to maintain message thread
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Kyle wrote:
> According to message:
> # No mountpoints are shown. What tool is available to determine if sda5 is
> # the /home directory of the previous (mandriva) installation? I want to
> # perform a base installation, leaving the /home directory un-touched.
>
>
According to message:
# No mountpoints are shown. What tool is available to determine if sda5 is
# the /home directory of the previous (mandriva) installation? I want to
# perform a base installation, leaving the /home directory un-touched.
If you are using the live iso, nothing is mounted by defa
2014-03-16 23:30 GMT+01:00 message :
> On 2014-03-16 21:58, arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org wrote:
>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 22:58:03 +0100
>> From: Karol Blazewicz
>> Subject: Re: [arch-general] installation using existing filesystem
>>
>>
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:30 PM, message wrote:
> On 2014-03-16 21:58, arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org wrote:
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 22:58:03 +0100
>> From: Karol Blazewicz
>> Subject: Re: [arch-general] installation using existing file
On 2014-03-16 21:58, arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org wrote:
--
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 22:58:03 +0100
From: Karol Blazewicz
Subject: Re: [arch-general] installation using existing filesystem
Have you read
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Beginners%2
On 2014-03-16 21:58, arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org wrote:
--
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 20:06:36 +0100
From: Kacper ?uk
Subject: Re: [arch-general] database non-existent error
I believe you've wanted to use pacstrap, not pacman :)
Sorry, pacman was a
Yeah youl need to mount it to different mount points
On Sunday, March 16, 2014, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:25 PM, message
> >
> wrote:
> > Readers,
> >
> > Tried:
> >
> > pacstrap /mnt base
> >
> > Which failed, due missing mountpoint. Similarly with '/' (/proc in use).
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:25 PM, message wrote:
> Readers,
>
> Tried:
>
> pacstrap /mnt base
>
> Which failed, due missing mountpoint. Similarly with '/' (/proc in use).
Does the moutnpoint exist? If not, what happens if you create it and try again?
>
> What is the correct command to instruct i
Readers,
Tried:
pacstrap /mnt base
Which failed, due missing mountpoint. Similarly with '/' (/proc in use).
What is the correct command to instruct installation using the existing
filesystem (previously mandriva: /, /boot, swap, /home partitions)?
--
2014-03-16 20:01 GMT+01:00 message :
> Readers,
>
> A little history: previously a mandrake and suse user,just tried mageia that
> failed and now want to try a different system!
>
> Version 20140301dual was downloaded as an iso file then burnt onto a CD.
> (This was a reason to try: other distribut
Readers,
A little history: previously a mandrake and suse user,just tried mageia
that failed and now want to try a different system!
Version 20140301dual was downloaded as an iso file then burnt onto a CD.
(This was a reason to try: other distributions are getting too big,
beyond the typical
I have a Thinkpad T42 which has been happily running Arch for many
months. Its video is AMD/ATI.
After a recent upgrade I started getting the dreaded blank page on boot.
Googling showed a lot of discussion of this on various distros
including Arch. The only solution seems to be to set nomodeset, w
17 matches
Mail list logo
