Re: [arch-general] Pulseaudio 5.1 Setup echoes Front Speakers to Rear speakers

2014-03-17 Thread Mark Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/17/2014 07:54 PM, Adriano Moura wrote: > Does the same happens with speaker-test? (included in alsa-utils) > Try running it like this: > speaker-test -c 6 > > > 2014-03-17 2:40 GMT-03:00 Kyle Terrien : > >> On 03/16/2014 10:21 PM, Kyle Terri

Re: [arch-general] Pulseaudio 5.1 Setup echoes Front Speakers to Rear speakers

2014-03-17 Thread Adriano Moura
Does the same happens with speaker-test? (included in alsa-utils) Try running it like this: speaker-test -c 6 2014-03-17 2:40 GMT-03:00 Kyle Terrien : > On 03/16/2014 10:21 PM, Kyle Terrien wrote: > > Are you using PulseAudio? > > D'oh! I noticed the subject line said "Pulseaudio" right after se

[arch-general] SOLVED Upgrade systemd 208-11 -> systemd-210-3 - suspend issue

2014-03-17 Thread Friedrich Strohmaier
Hi all, Am 09.03.2014 20:58 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier: > I run a Lenovo x200 which usually is put on the docking station with lid > closed. > after the Upgrade of systemd-208-11 -> systemd-210-3 while booting it > immediately suspends when systemd somehow reaches suspend.service at startup.

[arch-general] the Team needs You!!

2014-03-17 Thread Billy McCann
Salutations and Felicitations. Not long ago, a call was put out to the Arch community to assist in the monitoring and reporting of Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures. [1][2] The Arch community has responded by creating the Arch CVE Monitoring Team (ACMT). The wiki page contains all of the infor

Re: [arch-general] user management error

2014-03-17 Thread Guus Snijders
Op 17 mrt. 2014 19:25 schreef "message" het volgende: > > Readers, > > A previously existing /home directory was mounted into the file system during the installation process; this directory contained files in a directory 'a'. > > A user was created from the root user account: > > useradd -M -p [pa

Re: [arch-general] user management error

2014-03-17 Thread Mark Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/17/2014 02:50 PM, Gerald Stuhrberg wrote: > Hello, > > /etc/passwd does not store the password, a hashed version of the password > is stored in /etc/shadow > > If the directory isn't being mounted, can you please post the contents of > /etc/f

Re: [arch-general] user management error

2014-03-17 Thread Gerald Stuhrberg
Hello, /etc/passwd does not store the password, a hashed version of the password is stored in /etc/shadow If the directory isn't being mounted, can you please post the contents of /etc/fstab ? You can also check dmesg and journalctl to see if you have messages relating to the mounting of the /ho

Re: [arch-general] user management error

2014-03-17 Thread Jakub Klinkovský
On 17.03.14 at 18:25, message wrote: > Readers, > > A previously existing /home directory was mounted into the file system > during the installation process; this directory contained files in a > directory 'a'. > > A user was created from the root user account: > > useradd -M -p [password] -s /b

[arch-general] display manager dvorak recognition failure

2014-03-17 Thread message
Readers, Initially lxdm, gdm have been installed, but neither recognise a dvorak keyboard. How to configure the graphical display manager so that a user can specify the keyboard layout before to enter sign-in credentials? -- digest-mode subscriber; please cc to maintain message thread

[arch-general] user management error

2014-03-17 Thread message
Readers, A previously existing /home directory was mounted into the file system during the installation process; this directory contained files in a directory 'a'. A user was created from the root user account: useradd -M -p [password] -s /bin/bash [username'a'] After reboot, the system is

Re: [arch-general] tap device

2014-03-17 Thread Paul Gideon Dann
On Monday 17 Mar 2014 12:00:10 Mauro Santos wrote: > I suspect we might have been talking about 2 different things all along. > What I and Arnaud have been talking about is the tap interface on the > host, not the interface inside the container, which of course should be > properly configured by th

Re: [arch-general] tap device

2014-03-17 Thread Mauro Santos
On 17-03-2014 10:01, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > I don't get this: it seems normal to me that the interface would be down > until it's > configured by the container, pretty much like on a normal machine. The only > situation > in which you can expect an interface to be up already is in a network-

Re: [arch-general] tap device

2014-03-17 Thread Mauro Santos
On 17-03-2014 08:55, arnaud gaboury wrote: > After I related this issue (interfaces not being UP) on the > systemd-devel mailing list, Tom Gundersen did a commit yesterday nite > to change this behavior. So if you run systemd-git, just upgrade and > interfaces will now be UP, and you will be able

Re: [arch-general] tap device

2014-03-17 Thread Paul Gideon Dann
On Monday 17 Mar 2014 09:55:11 arnaud gaboury wrote: > > I guess someone will have to ask about it, either in the mailing list or > > irc, I haven't done so before because systemd-{nspawn,networkd} have > > lots of new functionality and I'm not sure I understand them all. > > After I related this

Re: [arch-general] tap device

2014-03-17 Thread arnaud gaboury
> I guess someone will have to ask about it, either in the mailing list or > irc, I haven't done so before because systemd-{nspawn,networkd} have > lots of new functionality and I'm not sure I understand them all. > After I related this issue (interfaces not being UP) on the systemd-devel mailing