Re: [arch-general] GNOME Software: Status and integrable?

On 26/03/14 02:45 AM, Mark Lee wrote: > On 03/25/2014 08:43 PM, Armin K. wrote: >> On 03/26/2014 01:26 AM, Karol Babioch wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> now that GNOME 3.12 has been released and probably will hit the >>> repos in the next couple of days/weeks, I'm wondering what the >>> current status of "S

Re: [arch-general] GNOME Software: Status and integrable?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/25/2014 08:43 PM, Armin K. wrote: > On 03/26/2014 01:26 AM, Karol Babioch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> now that GNOME 3.12 has been released and probably will hit the >> repos in the next couple of days/weeks, I'm wondering what the >> current status o

Re: [arch-general] GNOME Software: Status and integrable?

On 03/26/2014 01:26 AM, Karol Babioch wrote: > Hi, > > now that GNOME 3.12 has been released and probably will hit the repos in > the next couple of days/weeks, I'm wondering what the current status of > "Software" is [1]? This is an application similar to an app store in the > mobile world. > >

[arch-general] GNOME Software: Status and integrable?

Hi, now that GNOME 3.12 has been released and probably will hit the repos in the next couple of days/weeks, I'm wondering what the current status of "Software" is [1]? This is an application similar to an app store in the mobile world. I couldn't find it in the repos, and I wouldn't expect it to

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

On 25.03.14 at 23:35, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > > > As for firefox, these two lines starts firefox, BUT in workspace 2, as > > indicated in the i3 bar. > > > > exec firefox-aurora > > assign [instance="^firefox-aurora$"] 1 > > exec --no-startup-id i3-msg 'workspace 1; exec firefox-aurora' did the

[arch-general] What's with F# and mono?

I'm just starting to dip my toes in the mono waters. Slightly prompted by my current situation at work. In particular I'm interested in F#, but I'm finding the whole situation around mono/monodevelop + F# a bit confusing. 1. There are indications online that mono ships with F# [^1][^2]. But

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

> > As for firefox, these two lines starts firefox, BUT in workspace 2, as > indicated in the i3 bar. > > exec firefox-aurora > assign [instance="^firefox-aurora$"] 1 exec --no-startup-id i3-msg 'workspace 1; exec firefox-aurora' did the trick

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Lieven Moors wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:36:01PM +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> > >> > See the other post, and please keep try to keep the problem solving linear >> > (as >> > in "linear graph"), don't switch branches if possible. >> >> Mutt and weechat a

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:36:01PM +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > > > See the other post, and please keep try to keep the problem solving linear > > (as > > in "linear graph"), don't switch branches if possible. > > Mutt and weechat are on my TODO list This is hilarious...

Re: [arch-general] Error when I try update pacman -Syu

On 25-03-14 16:09, Maykel Franco wrote: 2014-03-24 18:58 GMT+01:00 Karol Blazewicz : On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 24.03.2014 17:18, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: jre7 is in the AUR so pacman won't update it, but jre7-openjdk is in the repos and provides the same 'item'

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

> > See the other post, and please keep try to keep the problem solving linear (as > in "linear graph"), don't switch branches if possible. Mutt and weechat are on my TODO list

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/25/2014 02:29 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Mark Lee wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> I just tested out i3 myself, and if you launch it with startx (from >> xorg-xinit), I don't have any issues

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

On 25.03.14 at 19:17, arnaud gaboury wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: > > On 25.03.14 at 18:56, arnaud gaboury wrote: > >> > > >> > i3 workspace is *not* tty! See > >> > http://i3wm.org/docs/userguide.html#_using_workspaces > >> > >> No ?? really? Are you joking ?

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

> > The 'assign' directive will not start Chromium, you would need to combine it > with 'exec'. Or have I misunderstood again? That is OK now with adding the exec line >> Furthermore, my keyboard is US, not the one I use. >> Part of my /etc/X11/xorg.conf >> >> Section "InputDevice" >> Identi

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Mark Lee wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > I just tested out i3 myself, and if you launch it with startx (from > xorg-xinit), I don't have any issues launching chromium in the same TTY. > > See

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

On 25.03.14 at 19:02, arnaud gaboury wrote: > >>> > >>> According to the Arch Wiki : > >>> ; > >>> that seems to be the correct behavior. > >>> > >>> You are assigning chromium to be launched on tty1. > > No, I am a

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/25/2014 02:17 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: >> On 25.03.14 at 18:56, arnaud gaboury wrote: i3 workspace is *not* tty! See http://i3wm.org/docs/userguide.html#_using_workspa

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: > On 25.03.14 at 18:56, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> > >> > i3 workspace is *not* tty! See >> > http://i3wm.org/docs/userguide.html#_using_workspaces >> >> No ?? really? Are you joking ? > > I'm certain. i3 workspaces are an implementation of "

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

On 25.03.14 at 18:56, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > > > i3 workspace is *not* tty! See > > http://i3wm.org/docs/userguide.html#_using_workspaces > > No ?? really? Are you joking ? I'm certain. i3 workspaces are an implementation of "virtual desktop" [1], as Wikipedia calls it. I'm quite sure that MA

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

>>> >>> According to the Arch Wiki : >>> ; >>> that seems to be the correct behavior. >>> >>> You are assigning chromium to be launched on tty1. No, I am assigning chromium to be launched on WORKSPACE 1 !! > I apol

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

> > i3 workspace is *not* tty! See > http://i3wm.org/docs/userguide.html#_using_workspaces No ?? really? Are you joking ?

Re: [arch-general] Package conflicts

On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:00:57 +0100 Karol Blazewicz wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Doug Newgard > wrote: > > > >> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:03:59 -0400 > >> From: jdarn...@buddydog.org > >> To: arch-general@archlinux.org > >> Subject: [arch-gene

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: > On 25.03.14 at 18:18, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> Dear list, >> >> I decided to get rid of my mate DE and go i3. Before I am testing my >> settings on tty2 (Ctrl+Alt+F2) with a modify .xinitrc (exec i3). >> >> I have a weird behavior as regar

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

On 25.03.14 at 18:18, arnaud gaboury wrote: > Dear list, > > I decided to get rid of my mate DE and go i3. Before I am testing my > settings on tty2 (Ctrl+Alt+F2) with a modify .xinitrc (exec i3). > > I have a weird behavior as regarding my web browser, could it be > chromium or firefox. > > On

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/25/2014 01:32 PM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: > On 25.03.14 at 13:26, Mark Lee wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 03/25/2014 01:23 PM, Jason Plum wrote: >>> Verify there is no running instance of Chromium in any o

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

On 25.03.14 at 13:26, Mark Lee wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 03/25/2014 01:23 PM, Jason Plum wrote: > > Verify there is no running instance of Chromium in any other session, as it > > spawns children withing its original session. I have seen this happen with > >

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/25/2014 01:23 PM, Jason Plum wrote: > Verify there is no running instance of Chromium in any other session, as it > spawns children withing its original session. I have seen this happen with > X2go as well. > > Jason Plum > WarheadsSE > > >

Re: [arch-general] browser and tty

Verify there is no running instance of Chromium in any other session, as it spawns children withing its original session. I have seen this happen with X2go as well. Jason Plum WarheadsSE On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:18 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > Dear list, > > I decided to get rid of my mate DE a

[arch-general] browser and tty

Dear list, I decided to get rid of my mate DE and go i3. Before I am testing my settings on tty2 (Ctrl+Alt+F2) with a modify .xinitrc (exec i3). I have a weird behavior as regarding my web browser, could it be chromium or firefox. On my i3 config. I have this line: assign [instance="^chromium$"

Re: [arch-general] Package conflicts

> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:59:29 +0100 > From: ad...@progandy.de > To: arch-general@archlinux.org > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Package conflicts > > Am 25.03.2014 16:33, schrieb Doug Newgard: >> >>> Date: Tue, 25 Ma

Re: [arch-general] Package conflicts

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:03:59 -0400 >> From: jdarn...@buddydog.org >> To: arch-general@archlinux.org >> Subject: [arch-general] Package conflicts >> >> I'm having a problem with the liteide vs goco

Re: [arch-general] Package conflicts

Am 25.03.2014 16:33, schrieb Doug Newgard: Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:03:59 -0400 From: jdarn...@buddydog.org To: arch-general@archlinux.org Subject: [arch-general] Package conflicts I'm having a problem with the liteide vs gocode-git packages. liteide, w

Re: [arch-general] Package conflicts

> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:03:59 -0400 > From: jdarn...@buddydog.org > To: arch-general@archlinux.org > Subject: [arch-general] Package conflicts > > I'm having a problem with the liteide vs gocode-git packages. liteide, > which is an official Pacman packag

Re: [arch-general] Error when I try update pacman -Syu

2014-03-24 18:58 GMT+01:00 Karol Blazewicz : > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Am 24.03.2014 17:18, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: >>> jre7 is in the AUR so pacman won't update it, but jre7-openjdk is in >>> the repos and provides the same 'item' as jre7: java-runtime=7 >>> htt

[arch-general] Package conflicts

I'm having a problem with the liteide vs gocode-git packages. liteide, which is an official Pacman package, has recently started to include the /usr/bin/gocode binary, which I have been using via the AUR package gocode-git (there is also another AUR package called gocode-bin but no pacman package).