Re: [arch-general] Comment on: Use systemd timers instead of /etc/cron.{hourly, daily, weekly, monthly}?

2014-04-25 Thread Carl Schaefer
> > Losing > > the ability to control when jobs run is giving up a lot; without that, > > the more use is made of systemd timers, the more unpredictable the > > results will be. > > See systemd.timer(5) manpage. The timer configuration _should be_ one-to-one > equivalent to a crontab, except for a

Re: [arch-general] Comment on: Use systemd timers instead of /etc/cron.{hourly, daily, weekly, monthly}?

2014-04-25 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:19:04 -0400 Carl Schaefer wrote: > It seems to me that, compared to cron/anacron, systemd timers currently > offer reduced functionality and no clear benefit (I don't consider the > act of uninstalling cron to have significant value in itself). But then again, you don't ma

[arch-general] couchdb still at 1.5.0-2 even though it has been updated to 1.5.1-1 two weeks ago.

2014-04-25 Thread Karol Blazewicz
couchdb is still at 1.5.0-2 even though it has been updated to 1.5.1-1 two weeks ago. https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/log/trunk?h=packages/couchdb https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/couchdb/ Is something stuck? Did I miss something?

Re: [arch-general] Comment on: Use systemd timers instead of /etc/cron.{hourly, daily, weekly, monthly}?

2014-04-25 Thread Carl Schaefer
It seems to me that, compared to cron/anacron, systemd timers currently offer reduced functionality and no clear benefit (I don't consider the act of uninstalling cron to have significant value in itself). Losing the ability to control when jobs run is giving up a lot; without that, the more use i

Re: [arch-general] Using Wayland/Weston in ArchLinux

2014-04-25 Thread Armin K.
On 04/25/2014 10:38 PM, pplive wrote: > Dear all, > > I have installed ArchLinux on a virtual machine hosted by my > VirtualBox. The desktop I picked is enlightenment > > I have also installed wayland/weston by pacman. > > I tried to play with weston according to the following page: > > https:/

[arch-general] Using Wayland/Weston in ArchLinux

2014-04-25 Thread pplive
Dear all, I have installed ArchLinux on a virtual machine hosted by my VirtualBox. The desktop I picked is enlightenment I have also installed wayland/weston by pacman. I tried to play with weston according to the following page: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/wayland If I just run westo

Re: [arch-general] pacman and keys

2014-04-25 Thread Curtis Shimamoto
On 04/25/14 at 10:09am, Heiko Becker wrote: > Me again ... > > Today I tried the update again. When using LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 everything runs > as reported. When setting LANG=C before everything gets updated but I get > some strange systemd errors on update: Why would you try to use LANG=C? That

Re: [arch-general] Comment on: Use systemd timers instead of /etc/cron.{hourly, daily, weekly, monthly}?

2014-04-25 Thread Maciej Puzio
> This is supposed to be handled by the AccuracySec=, which is supposed to > schedule timers at random times within the specified interval (in our > case, 12h). I have no idea why this doesn't work, it's definitely worth > looking into. So far, I have seen all timers elapsing around midnight. But

Re: [arch-general] Does openssl 1.0.1.g-1 close the heartbleed exploit?

2014-04-25 Thread David C. Rankin
On 04/25/2014 02:47 AM, Guus Snijders wrote: > Probably a stupid question, but you did restart the affected daemons (or > system) after the update? > Otherwise, they'll be using the old lib. > > mvg, Guus No question too stupid -- I had not. (I knew better...) Thanks, Sorry for the noise. -- D

Re: [arch-general] Android support in Linux Arch

2014-04-25 Thread Thiago Barroso Perrotta
Hello, Yeah, android-udev would be useful in [community]. And what do you think about moving android-sdk too? I personally also find more useful to get updates about Android tools from it rather than using any package managers or aur pkgbuilds. /opt could still be its install location. All the

Re: [arch-general] PPPoE broken on upload

2014-04-25 Thread Daniel Petre
On 25/04/14 15:25, Wayne S wrote: At 4/22/2014 06:31 AM, Lone Wolf wrote: On 22-04-14 02:49, Wayne S wrote: Recent updates have caused problems with my PPPoE FIOS link. The upload speed has been reduced to near zero. I "was" using arch linux box as a firewall router. I have a verizon fios co

Re: [arch-general] PPPoE broken on upload

2014-04-25 Thread Wayne S
At 4/22/2014 06:31 AM, Lone Wolf wrote: >On 22-04-14 02:49, Wayne S wrote: >> >>Recent updates have caused problems with my PPPoE FIOS link. The upload speed >>has been reduced to near zero. >> >>I "was" using arch linux box as a firewall router. I have a verizon fios >>connection that still uses

Re: [arch-general] Does openssl 1.0.1.g-1 close the heartbleed exploit?

2014-04-25 Thread Nowaker
I was testing my boxes after updating to openssl 1.0.1.g-1 with heartbleed.c and I am still able to grab and decrypt ssl packets. Most probably you didn't restart the services that link to openssl. lsof +c 0 | grep -w DEL | awk '1 { print $1 ": " $NF }' | grep libssl | sort -u https://mai

Re: [arch-general] pacman and keys

2014-04-25 Thread Heiko Becker
On 22.04.2014 13:32, Maximilian Bräutigam wrote: Am 22.04.2014 13:16, schrieb Heiko Becker: Am 22.04.2014 13:02, schrieb Heiko Becker: Hey, today I tried to update my system and got errors related to my pacman keys. As I have not been using my computer for a week I reinitialized the pacman k

Re: [arch-general] Does openssl 1.0.1.g-1 close the heartbleed exploit?

2014-04-25 Thread Dimitris Zervas
I tested my server after the update and found no problems... On Apr 25, 2014 10:41 AM, "David C. Rankin" wrote: > Guys, > > I was testing my boxes after updating to openssl 1.0.1.g-1 with > heartbleed.c > and I am still able to grab and decrypt ssl packets. The openssl security > note > says 1.

Re: [arch-general] Does openssl 1.0.1.g-1 close the heartbleed exploit?

2014-04-25 Thread Guus Snijders
Op 25 apr. 2014 09:41 schreef "David C. Rankin" < drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> het volgende: > > Guys, > > I was testing my boxes after updating to openssl 1.0.1.g-1 with heartbleed.c > and I am still able to grab and decrypt ssl packets. The openssl security note > says 1.0.1.g is not effecte

[arch-general] Does openssl 1.0.1.g-1 close the heartbleed exploit?

2014-04-25 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, I was testing my boxes after updating to openssl 1.0.1.g-1 with heartbleed.c and I am still able to grab and decrypt ssl packets. The openssl security note says 1.0.1.g is not effected by the bug, but I can still get a 64k chuck of data back from my server using the heartbleed.c test. (if