-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-06-15 23:49, Kyle Terrien wrote:
> I have narrowed this down to gvim/vim-runtime 7.4.307-1 and later.
> Earlier versions of the package do not have this issue.
>
> I am asking here because I am unsure if the issue is package
> related or up
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Most of my AUR installs warn me about the installed package being
> unsupported and potentially dangerous.
>
> I guess this is normal, and it's the default behaviour to warn about
> community package?
See https://bbs.ar
Hello every one,
I use notmuch to handle my mails, but I recently discovered that the man
pages aren't present in the notmuch package and there isn't any
notmuch-man package. Is that a decision or should I report a bug ?
Eventually should I make a notmuch-man package on the AUR ?
pgp0b1iBo8NL6.
On 16 June 2014 14:48, wrote:
> Hello every one,
>
> I use notmuch to handle my mails, but I recently discovered that the man
> pages aren't present in the notmuch package and there isn't any
> notmuch-man package. Is that a decision or should I report a bug ?
> Eventually should I make a notmuch
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:15:24PM +0200, Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
> You could open a bug report on Arch bug tracker and assign it to the
> maintainer asking for all man pages to be included in the different
> packages.
I'll do that then. Thanks for the quick answer.
pgpMY7XUe7oDf.pgp
Description:
Hi,
Is there a reason why core/inetutils is in base group, i.e. which
packages implicitly rely on it? It was added to base around Aug. 2011 ago, I
think because of hostname(1), but shouldn't this functionality be now provided
by hostnamectl?
Thanks,
--
Leonid Isaev
GPG fingerprints: DA92
On 16/06/14 07:35 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason why core/inetutils is in base group, i.e. which
> packages implicitly rely on it? It was added to base around Aug. 2011 ago, I
> think because of hostname(1), but shouldn't this functionality be now provided
> by hostnamec
You should also take some time to read this[1].
[1]: http://jasonwryan.com/blog/2013/04/09/helpers/
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 08:31:42PM -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:31:42 -0400
> From: Daniel Micay
> To: arch-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] inetutils and the 'base' group
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101
> Thunderb
On 06/16/2014 03:34 AM, Timothée Ravier wrote:
> On 2014-06-15 23:49, Kyle Terrien wrote:
>> I have narrowed this down to gvim/vim-runtime 7.4.307-1 and later.
>> Earlier versions of the package do not have this issue.
>
>> I am asking here because I am unsure if the issue is package
>> related o
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason why core/inetutils is in base group, i.e. which
> packages implicitly rely on it? It was added to base around Aug. 2011 ago,
> I
> think because of hostname(1), but shouldn't this functionality be now
> provi
11 matches
Mail list logo