Re: [arch-general] Changing sizes of panes in a vimsplit resets scrolling

2014-06-16 Thread Timothée Ravier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2014-06-15 23:49, Kyle Terrien wrote: > I have narrowed this down to gvim/vim-runtime 7.4.307-1 and later. > Earlier versions of the package do not have this issue. > > I am asking here because I am unsure if the issue is package > related or up

Re: [arch-general] AUR, Unsupported package: Potentially dangerous

2014-06-16 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > Hi all, > > Most of my AUR installs warn me about the installed package being > unsupported and potentially dangerous. > > I guess this is normal, and it's the default behaviour to warn about > community package? See https://bbs.ar

[arch-general] NotMuch man pages

2014-06-16 Thread luc . linux
Hello every one, I use notmuch to handle my mails, but I recently discovered that the man pages aren't present in the notmuch package and there isn't any notmuch-man package. Is that a decision or should I report a bug ? Eventually should I make a notmuch-man package on the AUR ? pgp0b1iBo8NL6.

Re: [arch-general] NotMuch man pages

2014-06-16 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
On 16 June 2014 14:48, wrote: > Hello every one, > > I use notmuch to handle my mails, but I recently discovered that the man > pages aren't present in the notmuch package and there isn't any > notmuch-man package. Is that a decision or should I report a bug ? > Eventually should I make a notmuch

Re: [arch-general] NotMuch man pages

2014-06-16 Thread luc . linux
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:15:24PM +0200, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: > You could open a bug report on Arch bug tracker and assign it to the > maintainer asking for all man pages to be included in the different > packages. I'll do that then. Thanks for the quick answer. pgpMY7XUe7oDf.pgp Description:

[arch-general] inetutils and the 'base' group

2014-06-16 Thread Leonid Isaev
Hi, Is there a reason why core/inetutils is in base group, i.e. which packages implicitly rely on it? It was added to base around Aug. 2011 ago, I think because of hostname(1), but shouldn't this functionality be now provided by hostnamectl? Thanks, -- Leonid Isaev GPG fingerprints: DA92

Re: [arch-general] inetutils and the 'base' group

2014-06-16 Thread Daniel Micay
On 16/06/14 07:35 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a reason why core/inetutils is in base group, i.e. which > packages implicitly rely on it? It was added to base around Aug. 2011 ago, I > think because of hostname(1), but shouldn't this functionality be now provided > by hostnamec

Re: [arch-general] AUR, Unsupported package: Potentially dangerous

2014-06-16 Thread Alex Jordan
You should also take some time to read this[1]. [1]: http://jasonwryan.com/blog/2013/04/09/helpers/

Re: [arch-general] inetutils and the 'base' group

2014-06-16 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 08:31:42PM -0400, Daniel Micay wrote: > Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:31:42 -0400 > From: Daniel Micay > To: arch-general@archlinux.org > Subject: Re: [arch-general] inetutils and the 'base' group > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 > Thunderb

Re: [arch-general] Changing sizes of panes in a vimsplit resets scrolling

2014-06-16 Thread Kyle Terrien
On 06/16/2014 03:34 AM, Timothée Ravier wrote: > On 2014-06-15 23:49, Kyle Terrien wrote: >> I have narrowed this down to gvim/vim-runtime 7.4.307-1 and later. >> Earlier versions of the package do not have this issue. > >> I am asking here because I am unsure if the issue is package >> related o

Re: [arch-general] inetutils and the 'base' group

2014-06-16 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a reason why core/inetutils is in base group, i.e. which > packages implicitly rely on it? It was added to base around Aug. 2011 ago, > I > think because of hostname(1), but shouldn't this functionality be now > provi