Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Stefan Tatschner
Am Mittwoch, den 25.06.2014, 08:58 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: > [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ uname -rm > 3.8.13-rt14-1-rt x86_64 > [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pacman -Si linux-lts | grep Version > Version: 3.10.44-1 > > I still don't know what messages you don't get, however, I get messages

[arch-general] NetworkManager messages during bootup

2014-06-25 Thread Yamakaky
Hi With the 214 systemd update, I now get during boot a lot of messages from NetworkManager. They are at loglevel . I didn't changed journald.conf. I also noticed that an other daemon outputs logs. Did the default log level changed ? How can I change that ? Thanks

[arch-general] Module needed by a unit

2014-06-25 Thread Yamakaky
Hi I'm trying to improve the unit for a fan manager daemon for MacBook Pro. As it is, it's a dependency of multi-user.target. I would like it to start earlier in the boot process, so that he is available with rescue.target, and to refresh the computer during bootup. I tried with DefaultDepen

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Martti Kühne
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Stefan Tatschner wrote: > I dont't get *ANY* message after booting the machine. After every > service has been started (my last one is always fail2ban) I do not get > any more messages. This includes e.g. postfix, amavis, ssh, dovecot, > cron, sudo things, ... > >

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Stefan Tatschner
Am Mittwoch, den 25.06.2014, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Martti Kühne: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Stefan Tatschner > > The lack of journal messages also mean that fail2ban does not work; > > that's really bad. I will try updating once again later this day and > > I'll let you know. > > I'm not sur

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Martti Kühne
This is not correct. :-) Fail2ban needs to somehow get those messages from journald. Did you try disabling it for a boot? When you update today, maybe trying to log the clogging of your services (eg. strace) would be a good idea. cheers! mar77i

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Davor Rotim
Yes, same issue here. All services start normally just no logging to the journal. For example, journalctl -u systemd-networkd will only show logs until the systemd 214 upgrade after that as if it never existed (but strangely everything works normally). This is on 3.15.1-1-ARCH i686.

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Davor Rotim
I have reported this to the bug tracker: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/40970

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

2014-06-25 Thread Stefan Tatschner
Am Mittwoch, den 25.06.2014, 12:40 +0200 schrieb Davor Rotim: > Yes, same issue here. All services start normally just no logging to the > journal. For example, journalctl -u systemd-networkd will only show logs > until the systemd 214 upgrade after that as if it never existed (but > strangely ever

[arch-general] New mailing list for AUR requests (delete, merge, orphan, ..)

2014-06-25 Thread Florian Pritz
Hi, As requested by Lukas, I've created a new mailing list for AUR related requests such as deletion, merge or orphan requests. The AUR will soon feature a web interface to create such requests and for history and discussion purposes mails will be sent to this new list. Please start using it for

[arch-general] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?

2014-06-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1, https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2? On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, at evolution-l...@gnome.org Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > the latest stable releas

Re: [arch-general] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?

2014-06-25 Thread Daniel Micay
On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1, > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the > current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2? > > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, at evolution-l...@gnome.org P

Re: [arch-general] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?

2014-06-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote: > On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1, > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the > > current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2? > > >

Re: [arch-general] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?

2014-06-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote: > > On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1, > > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the >

[arch-general] [answered (solved)] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?

2014-06-25 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote: > > > On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1, > > > > https:

Re: [arch-general] New mailing list for AUR requests (delete, merge, orphan, ..)

2014-06-25 Thread Runiq
On 25.06.2014 22:02:51, Florian Pritz wrote: As requested by Lukas, I've created a new mailing list for AUR related requests such as deletion, merge or orphan requests. The AUR will soon feature a web interface to create such requests and for history and discussion purposes mails will be sent to