Re: [arch-general] bugs.archlinux.org - enable comments on closed issues

2014-08-22 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 23.08.2014 um 05:07 schrieb Nowaker: > But closing the issue shouldn't end > the discussion - the reporter may want to add something. It should do exactly that. The bugtracker is not a discussion board, it's a bug tracker. Fixed bugs are not tracked. If you need a discussion, there's plenty of

[arch-general] bugs.archlinux.org - enable comments on closed issues

2014-08-22 Thread Nowaker
Hi, This is annoying that the reporter can't leave any comment after the issue is closed. No, I don't want to "Request re-open". The issue is closed for a good reason, no doubt. But closing the issue shouldn't end the discussion - the reporter may want to add something. Can you please consider cha

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] systemd 216 coming soon to testing

2014-08-22 Thread LoneVVolf
On 22-08-14 11:07, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: If I remember correctly, when the switch to systemd was first made, the migration guide on the wiki did in fact talk the user through forwarding the journal to syslog-ng by modifying some config files. Paul I'm 99% sure that those changes had to be m

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] systemd 216 coming soon to testing

2014-08-22 Thread Paul Gideon Dann
On Thursday 21 Aug 2014 13:40:48 Leonid Isaev wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:56:06AM -0500, Bigby James wrote: > > > > It seems this is just a change in the default settings, nothing more. > > > > > > I know, but not everyone follows systemd-devel. So, just updating > > > systemd would lead t