-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/26/2014 07:43 PM, Lorenzo Bandieri wrote:
Hi list,
I have a favor to ask to those that are currently testing Gnome
3.14.
In gnome 3.12 I am having problems with user switching, which is
quite important for me. In particular, I had this
On 09/26/2014 05:11 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
I should qualify that in that I don't think adding another package to
base is a good idea *unless* there is a significant benefit to doing
so. The plan to add dash to base when Arch was using initscripts made
sense, it doesn't now that we're using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2014 09:01 AM, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
On 09/26/2014 05:11 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
I should qualify that in that I don't think adding another
package to base is a good idea *unless* there is a significant
benefit to doing so. The
On 09/27/2014 01:04 AM, Florian Pelz wrote:
Regardless of what's the default, could there be a cleaner way to use
dash as one's /bin/sh without preventing pacman from upgrading bash?
Manually replace /bin/sh as a symlink to /bin/dash and then set the
/etc/pacman.conf values:
NoUpgrade =
On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 09:04 +0200, Florian Pelz wrote:
On 09/27/2014 09:01 AM, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
On 09/26/2014 05:11 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
I should qualify that in that I don't think adding another
package to base is a good idea *unless* there is a significant
benefit to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2014 09:23 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 09:04 +0200, Florian Pelz wrote:
On 09/27/2014 09:01 AM, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
On 09/26/2014 05:11 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
I should qualify that in that I don't think adding
On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 01:21 -0600, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
I assumed NoExtract should have been enough
Correct! Or are we missing something?
On 09/27/2014 01:28 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 01:21 -0600, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
I assumed NoExtract should have been enough
Correct! Or are we missing something?
Oddly, using only NoExtract caused pacman to remove the usr/bin/sh
symlink, replacing it with nothing.
On 09/26/2014 02:57 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
You're wanting it to hide functionality in certain circumstances,
which isn't wrong, but it isn't required. One way is not more correct
than the other.
I think not doing stupid things with env vars qualifies as more correct.
Smaller code bases can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2014 09:30 AM, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
On 09/27/2014 01:28 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 01:21 -0600, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
I assumed NoExtract should have been enough
Correct! Or are we missing something?
On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 10:02 +0200, Florian Pelz wrote:
On 09/27/2014 09:30 AM, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
On 09/27/2014 01:28 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 01:21 -0600, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
I assumed NoExtract should have been enough
Correct! Or are we missing
On 27 Sep 2014 08:56, Florian Pelz pelzflor...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, it seems to still be broken in 3.14. I have had no issues without
switching, but now that I tried it:
- - The first time I switched users to myself, GNOME froze in the
activities when I tried to open a terminal (because
On 09/27/2014 02:13 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 10:02 +0200, Florian Pelz wrote:
Same here. With only NoExtract, I linked /bin/sh to dash, reinstalled
bash, and /bin/sh was gone. With both NoExtract and NoUpgrade, I did
the same and /bin/sh was still a link to dash.
My bad,
13 matches
Mail list logo
