On 10/30/2014 12:04 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote:
Hi there,
tmpfiles.d is not the right approch: There is the RuntimeDirectory
keyword for unit files to manage that directory. See
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.exec.html for
details.
The advantage of this keyword is that sys
Hi there,
tmpfiles.d is not the right approch: There is the RuntimeDirectory
keyword for unit files to manage that directory. See
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.exec.html for
details.
The advantage of this keyword is that systemd makes sure that it is
pristine whenever th
Genes Lists on Thu, 2014/10/30 08:52:
> On 10/30/2014 08:27 AM, Christian Hesse wrote:
>
> > Possibly /var/run is no longer linked to ../run?
> > You should change the path in /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/stunnel.conf from
> > "/var/run/stunnel" to "/run/stunnel".
>
>I did check that and /var/run is
On 10/30/2014 08:27 AM, Christian Hesse wrote:
Possibly /var/run is no longer linked to ../run?
You should change the path in /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/stunnel.conf from
"/var/run/stunnel" to "/run/stunnel".
I did check that and /var/run is indeed linked to /run.
Ralf Mardorf writes:
Hi,
> On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 21:43 +0100, Temlin Olivér wrote:
>> I'd recommend the comments, since it bothers less people, but beware
>> that usually only the maintainer is subscribed, so it might take a few
>> days to get an answer.
>
> Assumed there are issue, it would be
Genes Lists on Thu, 2014/10/30 08:23:
>2) There is a tmpfiles snippet:
>
> # cat /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/stunnel.conf
> d /var/run/stunnel 0770 stunnel stunnel -
>
> 3) So the question now is why was /run/stunnel not created at boot?
>
> journal only has this reference to tmpfiles:
Did not
On 10/30/2014 02:08 AM, Doug Newgard wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:17:19 -0700
"Patrick Burroughs (Celti)" wrote:
...
Shouldn't that rather be handled by a tmpfiles.d snippet, and not in
the service file?
..
Yes, tmpfiles is the correct way of handling this and there is already
a conf file
7 matches
Mail list logo
