Re: [arch-general] gnupg 2.1 not stable

2014-12-18 Thread Christian Hesse
Ido Rosen on Wed, 2014/12/17 09:03: > From gnupg.org: > "2.0.26 is the stable version suggested for most users, > 2.1.1 is the brand-new modern version with support for ECC and many > other new features, > and 1.4.18 is the classic portable version." Marking version 2.1 stable would include some

Re: [arch-general] gnupg 2.1 not stable

2014-12-18 Thread P. A. López-Valencia
On 17/12/14 16:46, Jacob Joseph wrote: On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:43:52 +1100 Gaetan Bisson wrote: [2014-12-17 09:03:31 -0500] Ido Rosen: 2.0.26 is the stable version suggested for most users, 2.1.1 is the brand-new modern version Arch is not stable, it's modern. Besides, there are no open bug

Re: [arch-general] gnupg 2.1 not stable

2014-12-18 Thread Mike Cloaked
Just to add a link showing the need for help for the gnupg developers it may be worth having a quick look at https://gnupg.org/blog/20141214-gnupg-and-g10.html -- mike c

Re: [arch-general] gnupg 2.1 not stable

2014-12-18 Thread Jacob Joseph
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 05:11:00 -0500 "P. A. López-Valencia" wrote: > > On 17/12/14 16:46, Jacob Joseph wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:43:52 +1100 > > Gaetan Bisson wrote: > > > >> [2014-12-17 09:03:31 -0500] Ido Rosen: > >>> 2.0.26 is the stable version suggested for most users, > >>> 2.1.1 is

[arch-general] systemd upgrade - run mkinitcpio automaitcally

2014-12-18 Thread Troy Engel
Hiya all, Upgrading this evening we get systemd 218 - I rebooted and happened to notice that the initramfs said "loading systemd 217" and off it went... so I ran mkinitcpio -p linux to rebuild a new one and rebooted into it. I'm OCD like that. Should upgrades to systemd have some sort of post ins