Ido Rosen on Wed, 2014/12/17 09:03:
> From gnupg.org:
> "2.0.26 is the stable version suggested for most users,
> 2.1.1 is the brand-new modern version with support for ECC and many
> other new features,
> and 1.4.18 is the classic portable version."
Marking version 2.1 stable would include some
On 17/12/14 16:46, Jacob Joseph wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:43:52 +1100
Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2014-12-17 09:03:31 -0500] Ido Rosen:
2.0.26 is the stable version suggested for most users,
2.1.1 is the brand-new modern version
Arch is not stable, it's modern.
Besides, there are no open bug
Just to add a link showing the need for help for the gnupg developers it
may be worth having a quick look at
https://gnupg.org/blog/20141214-gnupg-and-g10.html
--
mike c
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 05:11:00 -0500
"P. A. López-Valencia" wrote:
>
> On 17/12/14 16:46, Jacob Joseph wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:43:52 +1100
> > Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> >
> >> [2014-12-17 09:03:31 -0500] Ido Rosen:
> >>> 2.0.26 is the stable version suggested for most users,
> >>> 2.1.1 is
Hiya all,
Upgrading this evening we get systemd 218 - I rebooted and happened to
notice that the initramfs said "loading systemd 217" and off it
went... so I ran mkinitcpio -p linux to rebuild a new one and rebooted
into it. I'm OCD like that.
Should upgrades to systemd have some sort of post ins
5 matches
Mail list logo