Re: [arch-general] Severity of Failed checksum for PKGBUILD

On 02/19/2015 05:46 PM, Mark Lee wrote: > On 02/19/2015 05:24 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: >> On 19 February 2015 at 21:42, Doug Newgard wrote: >>> You can't. If upstream provides a checksum, that gives you some >>> verification, >>> but since github doesn't, there's no way to verify any of it. >>

Re: [arch-general] Severity of Failed checksum for PKGBUILD

On 02/19/2015 05:24 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: > On 19 February 2015 at 21:42, Doug Newgard wrote: >> You can't. If upstream provides a checksum, that gives you some verification, >> but since github doesn't, there's no way to verify any of it. > > I don't know about github, but with bitbucket th

Re: [arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 [marcel@oompf ~]$ md5sum archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso 3d6a54886230649a049a9d431e03bbba archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso Everything should be fine with this mirror. Am 19. Februar 2015 22:54:45 MEZ, schrieb "David C. Rankin" : >On 02/19/2015 0

Re: [arch-general] Severity of Failed checksum for PKGBUILD

On 19 February 2015 at 21:42, Doug Newgard wrote: > You can't. If upstream provides a checksum, that gives you some verification, > but since github doesn't, there's no way to verify any of it. I don't know about github, but with bitbucket the checksums of these generated tarballs may change occa

Re: [arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

On 02/19/2015 03:00 PM, Jesse B. Rodriguez wrote: On Feb 19, 2015 1:51 PM, "David C. Rankin" wrote: All, http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/archlinux/iso/2015.02.01/md5sums.txt reports: 3d6a54886230649a049a9d431e03bbba archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso Actual download reports: 31fa61afd67cbd88

Re: [arch-general] Maybe bug in glibc

Klaus schrieb: > Anatol Pomozov schrieb: > > Hi > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Klaus wrote: > > > Anatol Pomozov schrieb: > > >> Hi > > >> > > >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Klaus > > >> wrote: > > >> > Hi, > > >> > > > >> > my firefox and seamonkey have been segfaulting for a m

Re: [arch-general] Maybe bug in glibc

Hi On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Klaus wrote: > Anatol Pomozov schrieb: >> Hi >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Klaus wrote: >> > Anatol Pomozov schrieb: >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Klaus >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > my firefox and seamonkey have

Re: [arch-general] Maybe bug in glibc

> #3 0x77dee003 in _dl_open ( > file=0x7fffcdae7148 "/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so", > mode=-2147483647, > caller_dlopen=0x721a158b , Looks like your crash is related to loading the flash plug-in. Have you tried disabling it?

Re: [arch-general] Maybe bug in glibc

Anatol Pomozov schrieb: > Hi > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Klaus wrote: > > Anatol Pomozov schrieb: > >> Hi > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Klaus wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > my firefox and seamonkey have been segfaulting for a month or so. > >> > > >> > Running the softwa

Re: [arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

On Feb 19, 2015 1:51 PM, "David C. Rankin" wrote: > > All, > > http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/archlinux/iso/2015.02.01/md5sums.txt reports: > > 3d6a54886230649a049a9d431e03bbba archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso > > Actual download reports: > > 31fa61afd67cbd88c91f97d7d04244a1 archlinux-2015.02.01-d

[arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

All, http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/archlinux/iso/2015.02.01/md5sums.txt reports: 3d6a54886230649a049a9d431e03bbba archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso Actual download reports: 31fa61afd67cbd88c91f97d7d04244a1 archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso Will try download again, but can anyone confirm correct m

Re: [arch-general] Severity of Failed checksum for PKGBUILD

On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:34:31 -0500 Mark Lee wrote: > On 02/19/2015 03:28 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:15:42 -0500 > > Mark Lee wrote: > > > >> Salutations, > >> > >> After trying to build the mpv-0.8.0-1 and finding that the PKGBUILD's > >> checksum was incorrect, I filed

Re: [arch-general] Severity of Failed checksum for PKGBUILD

On 02/19/2015 03:28 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:15:42 -0500 > Mark Lee wrote: > >> Salutations, >> >> After trying to build the mpv-0.8.0-1 and finding that the PKGBUILD's >> checksum was incorrect, I filed a bug report. See >>

Re: [arch-general] Severity of Failed checksum for PKGBUILD

On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:15:42 -0500 Mark Lee wrote: > Salutations, > > After trying to build the mpv-0.8.0-1 and finding that the PKGBUILD's > checksum was incorrect, I filed a bug report. See > . > > I filed it under "cri

[arch-general] Severity of Failed checksum for PKGBUILD

Salutations, After trying to build the mpv-0.8.0-1 and finding that the PKGBUILD's checksum was incorrect, I filed a bug report. See . I filed it under "critical" since an incorrect checksum means that the package was built