[arch-general] KVM troubles

Does anyone here have experience troubleshooting KVM installs in arch? I am using virsh and virt-manager, the VM seems to successfully boot, but the virtualization window is only showing a black screen with a cursor in the top left of the window. (on the host) journelctl -xe only shows one relat

Re: [arch-general] archwiki - PHP page, no longer a recommended config for php and apache?

On 11/22/2015 10:39 PM, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:53:46 -0600 "David C. Rankin" wrote: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Apache_HTTP_Server#PHP God -- I hate it when that happens - sorry for the noise :) -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Re: [arch-general] archwiki - PHP page, no longer a recommended config for php and apache?

On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:53:46 -0600 "David C. Rankin" wrote: >Where the confusion lies, is there are no longer *any* suggested > configurations for plain PHP (from the traditional php package) and > Apache? Does this mean that the combination of plain php and apache > is no longer recommended/

[arch-general] archwiki - PHP page, no longer a recommended config for php and apache?

All, Less than 90 days ago I went through a server rebuild and at the time there were 3 options listed in the PHP wiki for using PHP (the normal php package) with apache: libphp5.so apache2-mpm-worker and mod_fcgid php-fpm and mod_proxy_fcgi (see original thread from 8/25/15

[arch-general] Bug? Home (encrypted) unmount error message during shutdown, when using UUID in fstab

Hello everyone, This is my first post here, hope I'm doing it allright:) I have an encrypted setup with both / and home encrypted, on two different partitions with plain LUKS, so no LVM, RAID, etc.. Since my last Arch update I have a strange issue: during shutdown, I get the following error mes

[arch-general] hifishield / odroid-c1+ plus on archlinux

Hi,   howto setup the hifishield odroid-c1+ on archlinux.   cheers, Andreas

Re: [arch-general] Linux still at 4.2, but nvidia and virtualbox compiled for 4.3?

2015-11-22 12:35 GMT+01:00 Laurent Carlier : > Le dimanche 22 novembre 2015, 12:08:28 CET Sebastiaan Lokhorst a écrit : > > 2015-11-22 11:30 GMT+01:00 Laurent Carlier : > > > This should be fixed with 5.0.10-2.1 version > > > > Thanks, it is! > > > > What about the nvidia package? Should I file a

Re: [arch-general] Linux still at 4.2, but nvidia and virtualbox compiled for 4.3?

Le dimanche 22 novembre 2015, 12:08:28 CET Sebastiaan Lokhorst a écrit : > 2015-11-22 11:30 GMT+01:00 Laurent Carlier : > > This should be fixed with 5.0.10-2.1 version > > Thanks, it is! > > What about the nvidia package? Should I file a bug? Should be fixed also with 358.16-2.1 version :) --

Re: [arch-general] Linux still at 4.2, but nvidia and virtualbox compiled for 4.3?

2015-11-22 11:30 GMT+01:00 Laurent Carlier : > > This should be fixed with 5.0.10-2.1 version > Thanks, it is! What about the nvidia package? Should I file a bug?

Re: [arch-general] Linux still at 4.2, but nvidia and virtualbox compiled for 4.3?

Le dimanche 22 novembre 2015, 11:10:52 CET Sebastiaan Lokhorst a écrit : > So I just did an update and got the following messages: > > (16/24) upgrading nvidia > [--] 100% > cat: /usr/lib/modules/extramodules-4.3-ARCH/version: No such file or > directory > > (2

Re: [arch-general] Linux still at 4.2, but nvidia and virtualbox compiled for 4.3?

> It seems like these are looking for Linux 4.3, but the linux package in > [core] is still at 4.2. > > I'm afraid if I'll reboot, there will be problems with the graphics driver. > Why wasn't the linux package updated alongside these others? > > Or am I wrong, and is this harmless? > either y

[arch-general] Linux still at 4.2, but nvidia and virtualbox compiled for 4.3?

So I just did an update and got the following messages: (16/24) upgrading nvidia [--] 100% cat: /usr/lib/modules/extramodules-4.3-ARCH/version: No such file or directory (20/24) upgrading virtualbox-host-modules [--] 100% cat: /