On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 19:35:35 +
Tomasz Kramkowski wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:11:14AM -0600, Doug Newgard wrote:
> > On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 22:27:01 +0530
> > Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have read the dangers of mounting efivars as writable recently, and I
> > >
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 12:16:53AM +0100, Karol Babioch wrote:
> > What is the goal here?
>
> To have snapshots before and after pacman did any changes to the
> filesystem (i.e. upgraded packages), so one can easily rollback to a
> known good state in case of an error, and/or look at the diff
Hi,
Am 01.02.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Leonid Isaev:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:21:04PM +0100, Karol Babioch wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> now with hooks newly introduced to pacman, are there already some useful
>> btrfs and/or snapper hooks available? At least a quick look-around in
>> the forums and wit
On 1 February 2016 at 23:29, Leonid Isaev
wrote:
>
> Also, how can you brick a machine by simply zeroing the harddrive?
>
>
You can't (well, someone can probably think of a contrived situation where
you could, there's always someone, but generally speaking). The problem is
with removing certain
Sebastiaan Lokhorst wrote:
> 2016-02-01 23:29 GMT+01:00 Leonid Isaev :
>
>> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:40:54PM -0800, Kyle Terrien wrote:
>>> Tomasz Kramkowski wrote:
>>> * Use legacy BIOS. There is nothing wrong with it.
>> Exactly, I really don't understand this interest to UEFI (and don't ment
2016-02-01 23:29 GMT+01:00 Leonid Isaev :
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:40:54PM -0800, Kyle Terrien wrote:
> > Tomasz Kramkowski wrote:
> > * Use legacy BIOS. There is nothing wrong with it.
> Exactly, I really don't understand this interest to UEFI (and don't mention
> secureboot).
>
Many new (O
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:40:54PM -0800, Kyle Terrien wrote:
> Tomasz Kramkowski wrote:
> > Since when does "do something dumb" and "potentially hard brick your
> > motherboard" become synonymous when speaking in terms of computers?
> >
> > There's doing something dumb (by accident or otherwise)
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:21:04PM +0100, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> now with hooks newly introduced to pacman, are there already some useful
> btrfs and/or snapper hooks available? At least a quick look-around in
> the forums and with Google hasn't revealed anything yet.
What is the goal
On 02/02/16 at 12:16am, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 01.02.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Leonid Isaev:
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:21:04PM +0100, Karol Babioch wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> now with hooks newly introduced to pacman, are there already some useful
> >> btrfs and/or snapper hooks ava
Le 01/02/2016 23:05, Magnus Therning a écrit :
> I just noticed an email in this list mentioning that with pacman 5.0 we
> know have support for hooks. I proceeded to look at the man pages for
> /pacman/, /makepkg/, and /PKGBUILD/ but only found one mention of a
> /hookdir/.
>
> Is there more infor
Hi all,
now with hooks newly introduced to pacman, are there already some useful
btrfs and/or snapper hooks available? At least a quick look-around in
the forums and with Google hasn't revealed anything yet.
Maybe I'm getting something wrong here, but in my understanding it
should be doable and p
Maarten de Vries wrote:
> On 1 February 2016 at 23:29, Leonid Isaev
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Also, how can you brick a machine by simply zeroing the harddrive?
>>
>>
> You can't (well, someone can probably think of a contrived situation where
> you could, there's always someone, but generally speaking).
Am 01.02.2016 um 20:35 schrieb Tomasz Kramkowski:
> The newbies this change is aimed for are exactly the sorts of people who
> might unwittingly rm -rf /.
Arch Linux is not aimed at newbies.
There's been lots of panic over this issue, yet it took several years of
UEFI being in the field for someo
Bruno Pagani writes:
> Le 01/02/2016 23:05, Magnus Therning a écrit :
>> I just noticed an email in this list mentioning that with pacman 5.0 we
>> know have support for hooks. I proceeded to look at the man pages for
>> /pacman/, /makepkg/, and /PKGBUILD/ but only found one mention of a
>> /hook
On 01.02.2016 23:05, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Is there more information about this feature available somewhere?
$ man 5 alpm-hooks
S
I just noticed an email in this list mentioning that with pacman 5.0 we
know have support for hooks. I proceeded to look at the man pages for
/pacman/, /makepkg/, and /PKGBUILD/ but only found one mention of a
/hookdir/.
Is there more information about this feature available somewhere?
/M
--
M
Tomasz Kramkowski wrote:
> Since when does "do something dumb" and "potentially hard brick your
> motherboard" become synonymous when speaking in terms of computers?
>
> There's doing something dumb (by accident or otherwise) and then there's
> bricking your motherboard, people make accidents all
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:11:14AM -0600, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 22:27:01 +0530
> Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have read the dangers of mounting efivars as writable recently, and I
> > think
> > there should be an entry in the archlinux installation guide and be
On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 22:27:01 +0530
Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have read the dangers of mounting efivars as writable recently, and I think
> there should be an entry in the archlinux installation guide and beginner's
> guide which should say exactly what is said in the warning in [1], an
On February 1, 2016 11:57:01 AM EST, Jayesh Badwaik
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have read the dangers of mounting efivars as writable recently, and I
>think
>there should be an entry in the archlinux installation guide and
>beginner's
>guide which should say exactly what is said in the warning in [1], and
On 02/01/2016 09:46 AM, Jonathan Roemer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:52:03AM -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>> Way to go on not answering the question in any way, shape, or form...
>
> uBlock Origin [random screed follows]
>
> As the user's current Adblock Plus solution is broken, and they
> s
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:34:37AM +0100, Martin S. Weber wrote:
> On 2016-01-31 18:11:24, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> > (...)
>
> confirm chrome on awesome "right" (or 2ndary) monitor problems: This is
> an awesome + multi-monitor + chromium problem, not your graphics driver.
>
> folders in the book
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:52:03AM -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> Way to go on not answering the question in any way, shape, or form...
uBlock Origin is a less resource intensive, more thorough solution than
Adblock Plus. The relevant performance statistics are below.
https://github.com/gorhill/uBl
Hi,
I have read the dangers of mounting efivars as writable recently, and I think
there should be an entry in the archlinux installation guide and beginner's
guide which should say exactly what is said in the warning in [1], and then
link to [1] for further instructions.
--
Cheers
Jayesh Bad
Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:46:33 -0500
Jonathan Roemer :
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:52:03AM -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> > Way to go on not answering the question in any way, shape, or form...
>
> uBlock Origin [blurp]
Again, this thread is not a discussion about add-ons, but what to do
about Mozilla'
On 2016-01-31 18:11:24, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> (...)
confirm chrome on awesome "right" (or 2ndary) monitor problems: This is
an awesome + multi-monitor + chromium problem, not your graphics driver.
folders in the bookmark bar do not track "pressed" status or track the
mouse at all.
I believe it
On 01/31/2016 11:52 AM, Jonathan Roemer wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 11:45 -0500, Francis Gerund wrote:
>> is there a better idea?
>> Any opinions?
>
> uBlock Origin
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/
>
Way to go on not answering the question in any way, shape, or
On 01/31/2016 01:32 PM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst wrote:
> I think everyone is missing the point: the firefox-adblock-plus package[1]
> is broken since it does not work with the latest version of Firefox.
> It should probably be dropped from the repositories. I've opened a bug
> report.[1]
>
> [1] https
28 matches
Mail list logo