Re: [arch-general] Vulkan packages

2016-02-14 Thread Jan Alexander Steffens
On Feb 15, 2016 4:46 AM, "Eric Engeström" > I was thinking of splitting it into 4 packages: > - `vulkan-loader` with everything you need to run an app compiled against > Vulkan (/usr/lib/libvulkan.so*). This is what Vulkan-apps packages would > `depend` on. > - `vulkan-headers` with everything you

[arch-general] Vulkan packages

2016-02-14 Thread Eric Engeström
Hi all, With the release of Vulkan imminent, I thought I'd prepare some packages for Arch so that I can push them the minute it gets released :) I was thinking of splitting it into 4 packages: - `vulkan-loader` with everything you need to run an app compiled against Vulkan (/usr/lib/libvulkan.so*

Re: [arch-general] Error message with full disk encryption

2016-02-14 Thread Jonathan Horacio Villatoro Córdoba
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 07:49:59PM +0100, Carsten Mattner wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:23 PM, PeLo L wrote: > > > > adding 'shutdown' hook doesn't seem to work. Modifying '/etc/fstab' > > and replacing the UUID with '/dev/mapper/crypt-boot' did the trick. > > I've never used UUID volume id

Re: [arch-general] Error message with full disk encryption

2016-02-14 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/14/2016 01:04 PM, P. A. López-Valencia wrote: > > El 14/02/2016 a las 1:49 p. m., Carsten Mattner escribió: >> > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:23 PM, PeLo L wrote: >>> >> adding 'shutdown' hook doesn't seem to work. Modifying '/etc/fstab' >>> >> and replacing the UUID with '/dev/mapper/crypt-b

Re: [arch-general] Alternative init system proposal

2016-02-14 Thread João Miguel
> > Though I don't see how a repository officially trusted by > > Manjaro is less trusted than the AUR. > They are completely different. An unofficial repository of non-AUR packages > is for installing binary packages that have no affiliation with Arch Linux. > I think it's pretty obvious why that

Re: [arch-general] Alternative init system proposal

2016-02-14 Thread LoneVVolf
On 14-02-16 17:17, João Miguel wrote: Then I shall contact Artoo and add the packages back to the AUR as Nous suggested. Though I don't see how a repository officially trusted by Manjaro is less trusted than the AUR. Nevertheless, I do like the AUR, and packages being there might help. Have a g

Re: [arch-general] Alternative init system proposal

2016-02-14 Thread Maxwell Anselm
> Though I don't see how a repository officially trusted by > Manjaro is less trusted than the AUR. They are completely different. An unofficial repository of non-AUR packages is for installing binary packages that have no affiliation with Arch Linux. I think it's pretty obvious why that would not

Re: [arch-general] Error message with full disk encryption

2016-02-14 Thread P . A . López-Valencia
El 14/02/2016 a las 1:49 p. m., Carsten Mattner escribió: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:23 PM, PeLo L wrote: >> adding 'shutdown' hook doesn't seem to work. Modifying '/etc/fstab' >> and replacing the UUID with '/dev/mapper/crypt-boot' did the trick. > I've never used UUID volume id and still see

Re: [arch-general] Error message with full disk encryption

2016-02-14 Thread Carsten Mattner
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:23 PM, PeLo L wrote: > > adding 'shutdown' hook doesn't seem to work. Modifying '/etc/fstab' > and replacing the UUID with '/dev/mapper/crypt-boot' did the trick. I've never used UUID volume id and still see the bug.

Re: [arch-general] Error message with full disk encryption

2016-02-14 Thread PeLo L
adding 'shutdown' hook doesn't seem to work. Modifying '/etc/fstab' and replacing the UUID with '/dev/mapper/crypt-boot' did the trick. From: arch-general on behalf of P. A. López-Valencia Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2016 05:18 To: arch-general@archl

Re: [arch-general] Alternative init system proposal

2016-02-14 Thread João Miguel
> > There are 4 mirrors for an unnoficial user repository with packages that > > are officially used in Manjaro. > > > 3. Work on 1 and 2 until you feel like you have a clearly superior > method > > The method already existed, I just wanted to make it visible. > I think you misunderstood. I was no