Re: [arch-general] Htop 2.0 fonts

2016-02-16 Thread Garmine 42
On 16 February 2016 at 22:46, Christian Hesse wrote: > Garmine 42 on Tue, 2016/02/16 18:33: >> Hi! >> >> Since the update to 2.0 the usage graphs use nonexisting fonts - both >> TTY and uxterm show the "empty box" unicode character instead of the >> fonts shown on htop 2.0 screenshots. >> >> I di

Re: [arch-general] Alternative init system proposal

2016-02-16 Thread Kevin Monceaux
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 05:58:38PM +0100, Bardur Arantsson wrote: > Again... no "use case" apart from "I don't want to use systemd". That seems like a reasonable use case to me. My previous desktop box ran Arch. After setting it up Arch switched to systemd. When it came time to upgrade to a n

Re: [arch-general] Htop 2.0 fonts

2016-02-16 Thread Christian Hesse
Garmine 42 on Tue, 2016/02/16 18:33: > Hi! > > Since the update to 2.0 the usage graphs use nonexisting fonts - both > TTY and uxterm show the "empty box" unicode character instead of the > fonts shown on htop 2.0 screenshots. > > I did not find any missing dependency for htop on my system. > >

Re: [arch-general] Htop 2.0 fonts

2016-02-16 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:40:30 +0100, Nicolas F. wrote: >Might be a locale issue as opposed to a font issue. That being said, >works fine here. Oops, I missed the OP's "empty box" information. The OP likely expects what we get using utf8, but even iso88591 shows a tree, it's just not using "├─", bu

Re: [arch-general] Htop 2.0 fonts

2016-02-16 Thread goa
* Garmine 42 [16/02/2016 18:35:23] wrote: > Hi! > > Since the update to 2.0 the usage graphs use nonexisting fonts - both > TTY and uxterm show the "empty box" unicode character instead of the > fonts shown on htop 2.0 screenshots. > > I did not find any missing dependency for htop on my system. >

Re: [arch-general] Htop 2.0 fonts

2016-02-16 Thread Jens Adam
Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:48:22 +0100 Ralf Mardorf : > What is the "usage graph"? Do you mean the "tree view"? If so try > pushing F5. F2, -> (choose a meter in one of the columns), hit SPACE (F4 in htop 1.x) --byte pgpOqsHjl4K2r.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Re: [arch-general] Htop 2.0 fonts

2016-02-16 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:33:57 +0100, Garmine 42 wrote: >Since the update to 2.0 the usage graphs use nonexisting fonts What is the "usage graph"? Do you mean the "tree view"? If so try pushing F5.

Re: [arch-general] Htop 2.0 fonts

2016-02-16 Thread Nicolas F.
Might be a locale issue as opposed to a font issue. That being said, works fine here. $ locale LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_TIME="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_COLLATE="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_MONETARY="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_MESSAGES="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_PAPER="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_NAME="en_GB.U

[arch-general] Htop 2.0 fonts

2016-02-16 Thread Garmine 42
Hi! Since the update to 2.0 the usage graphs use nonexisting fonts - both TTY and uxterm show the "empty box" unicode character instead of the fonts shown on htop 2.0 screenshots. I did not find any missing dependency for htop on my system. Do anyone else have this issue? Any ideas? Shall I ins

Re: [arch-general] Ksnapshots not work

2016-02-16 Thread Bruno Pagani
ksnapshot does not exists anymore. It has been replaced by Spectacle. :) You must change your shorcuts settings. ;) Le 16 février 2016 15:16:59 GMT+01:00, Maykel Franco a écrit : >Hi, after update archlinux system, ksnapshot not work fine... Te key >impr >pet sys not work... > >Anybody with the

Re: [arch-general] Ksnapshots not work

2016-02-16 Thread Bennett Piater
Ksnapshot doesn't exist anymore. It was replaced by spectacle. Did you read the logs after the upgrade? On 02/16/2016 03:16 PM, Maykel Franco wrote: > Hi, after update archlinux system, ksnapshot not work fine... Te key impr > pet sys not work... > > Anybody with the same problem? > -- GPG fi

[arch-general] Ksnapshots not work

2016-02-16 Thread Maykel Franco
Hi, after update archlinux system, ksnapshot not work fine... Te key impr pet sys not work... Anybody with the same problem?

Re: [arch-general] SourceForge now supports TLS, update source URLs

2016-02-16 Thread Nicolas F.
On 16/02/16 11:55, Carsten Mattner wrote: > Cool, any reason why didn't submit a patch? Just curious, as you > already went ahead and did the legwork. Several reasons: - Would one submit a patch to each package's maintainer for that package? Perhaps the Arch project decides it's not worth the e

Re: [arch-general] Error message with full disk encryption

2016-02-16 Thread Carsten Mattner
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Jonathan Horacio Villatoro Córdoba wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 07:49:59PM +0100, Carsten Mattner wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:23 PM, PeLo L wrote: >> > >> > adding 'shutdown' hook doesn't seem to work. Modifying '/etc/fstab' >> > and replacing the UUID

Re: [arch-general] SourceForge now supports TLS, update source URLs

2016-02-16 Thread Carsten Mattner
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Nicolas F. wrote: > Hi all, > > quick reminder that SourceForge was recently acquired and since then > has enabled HTTPS on all of the site. Since some PKGBUILDs fetch their > sources from SourceForge, it might be a good idea to switch them from > using plain http: