Re: [arch-general] ocaml package out of date

2016-06-01 Thread Antonio Rojas
phimosis haver via arch-general wrote: > "The most recent version of OCaml is 4.03.0. It was released on > 2016-05-25." > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/ocaml/ is a super old > version. You may want to ping the maintainer directly, I doubt he's reading this list. But I

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Arch Linux website down

2016-06-01 Thread Levente Polyak
On 06/01/2016 07:02 PM, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I've been reading a thread on aur-general about too many loose git > objects and it appears the problem may be on the aur server not a user's > machine and git prune needs to be run. I am concerned that all of the > current technical difficulties may

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Arch Linux website down

2016-06-01 Thread Florian Pritz via arch-general
On 01.06.2016 11:36, Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote: > We are currently experiencing some technical problems with the webserver > for archlinux.org, bugs.archlinux.org, patchwork.archlinux.org. We are > working on it, but resolving this problem could take a while. The machine is back

Re: [arch-general] ocaml package out of date

2016-06-01 Thread Carsten Mattner via arch-general
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:25 AM, phimosis haver via arch-general wrote: > "The most recent version of OCaml is 4.03.0. It was released on 2016-05-25." > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/ocaml/ is a super old > version. I believe most people use opam to

[arch-general] Arch Linux website down

2016-06-01 Thread Florian Pritz via arch-general
Hi, We are currently experiencing some technical problems with the webserver for archlinux.org, bugs.archlinux.org, patchwork.archlinux.org. We are working on it, but resolving this problem could take a while. The mailinglists, AUR, wiki and forums are hosted on a different machine and are still