Re: [arch-general] Libreoffice Google Drive not working

2016-07-04 Thread Martin Zecher via arch-general
Thanks a lot Andy, but I still have the problem after upgrading libcmis to 0.5.1-2 On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Mon, 4 Jul 2016 17:43:29 +0200 > schrieb Andreas Radke : > > > Am Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:13:24 -0300 > > schrieb Martin Zecher via arch-general : > > > > > Whe

Re: [arch-general] Libreoffice Google Drive not working

2016-07-04 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Mon, 4 Jul 2016 17:43:29 +0200 schrieb Andreas Radke : > Am Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:13:24 -0300 > schrieb Martin Zecher via arch-general : > > > When trying to access Google Drive under Libreoffice 5.1.4-1, I get > > "The specified device is invalid". This problem should be fixed > > since 5.1.3.2

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-07-04 Thread Florian Pritz via arch-general
On 04.07.2016 19:54, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > Still good. :) I have yet to see a single email go to spam since you > fixed it. Glad to hear that. Thanks for the feedback! Florian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-07-04 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 07/04/2016 01:40 PM, Florian Pritz via arch-general wrote: > Since we didn't have too much traffic on the list in that week, what's > the situation like now? Have you seen any more list traffic go to spam > or is this fixed now? Still good. :) I have yet to see a single email go to spam since y

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-07-04 Thread Ilya Boka via arch-general
For me it's fixed now :) On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Florian Pritz via arch-general wrote: > On 16.06.2016 03:46, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: >> On 06/08/2016 03:45 PM, Florian Pritz via arch-general wrote: >>> Now that is something I totally missed when I read their guidelines, but

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-07-04 Thread Florian Pritz via arch-general
On 16.06.2016 03:46, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 06/08/2016 03:45 PM, Florian Pritz via arch-general wrote: >> Now that is something I totally missed when I read their guidelines, but >> it certainly sounds like it could be the cause of these problems. I have >> just switched the serv

Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

2016-07-04 Thread Giovanni 'ItachiSan' Santini via arch-general
Il 04/07/2016 18:35, Christian Hesse ha scritto: > > We have three places where this can come from... > > https://git.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/lib/libalpm/signing.c#n1008 > https://git.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/lib/libalpm/signing.c#n1038 > https://git.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/lib/l

Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

2016-07-04 Thread Christian Hesse
Giovanni 'ItachiSan' Santini on Mon, 2016/07/04 11:58: > Il 03/07/2016 23:50, Christian Hesse ha scritto: > > > > The db file is just a simple tar archive, compressed with gzip. Unzip it > > and you will find a directory for every package. Every directory contains > > the file 'desc' at least. Wi

Re: [arch-general] Libreoffice Google Drive not working

2016-07-04 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:13:24 -0300 schrieb Martin Zecher via arch-general : > When trying to access Google Drive under Libreoffice 5.1.4-1, I get > "The specified device is invalid". This problem should be fixed since > 5.1.3.2 according to > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9841

Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

2016-07-04 Thread Giovanni 'ItachiSan' Santini via arch-general
Il 03/07/2016 23:50, Christian Hesse ha scritto: > > The db file is just a simple tar archive, compressed with gzip. Unzip it and > you will find a directory for every package. Every directory contains the > file 'desc' at least. Within the file you should find a line '%PGPSIG%', > followed by a s

Re: [arch-general] Package are signed... but pacman doesn't like them...?

2016-07-04 Thread Giovanni 'ItachiSan' Santini via arch-general
Il 03/07/2016 23:50, Christian Hesse ha scritto: > > Looks like the build service produces invalid db files, > home_ItachiSan_archlinux_Arch_Extra.db in your case. > > The db file is just a simple tar archive, compressed with gzip. Unzip it and > you will find a directory for every package. Every