On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 23:39:59 +0100
João Miguel via arch-general wrote:
> A 2016-09-01T23:57:07 +0200, Magnus Therning escreveu:
> >
> > When packaging Haskell packages there's a bit of a twist to the version
> > numbers that I'm looking for a solution to.
> >
> >
A 2016-09-01T23:57:07 +0200, Magnus Therning escreveu:
>
> When packaging Haskell packages there's a bit of a twist to the version
> numbers that I'm looking for a solution to.
>
> Upstream versions have two numbers, a version number (set by the
> upstream developer) and an "xrev" that's bumped
On 09/01/2016 06:04 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
>> which isn't correct since
>>
>>0.7 < 0.7.0.1
>>0.4 < 0.4.1
>>
>> It seems `pacman` treats underbar like a period, which isn't at all what
>> I was hoping for.
>
> Sounds like .x would make more sense.
And similarly, *-git packages usually
> I'm also OK compiling my own bitcoin-qt or whatever, I'm just
> concerned there are many outdated packages as of late, and what makes
> Arch so special to many people is the rolling release part and up to
> date packages.
It seems legitimate to expect the package to be up-to-date given it may
be
On 09/01/2016 06:00 PM, Diego Viola wrote:
> No, I'm not saying that, please let's not make this personal, it's not.
>
> I'm also OK compiling my own bitcoin-qt or whatever, I'm just
> concerned there are many outdated packages as of late, and what makes
> Arch so special to many people is the
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 23:57:07 +0200
Magnus Therning wrote:
> When packaging Haskell packages there's a bit of a twist to the version
> numbers that I'm looking for a solution to.
>
> Upstream versions have two numbers, a version number (set by the
> upstream developer) and
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 09/01/2016 02:20 PM, Diego Viola wrote:
>> Well, I understand maintainers are busy, but it is your job as a
>> maintainer to communicate effectively, if I put some package up for
>> others to use it, it is MY
When packaging Haskell packages there's a bit of a twist to the version
numbers that I'm looking for a solution to.
Upstream versions have two numbers, a version number (set by the
upstream developer) and an "xrev" that's bumped when minor changes are
made to packages on Hackage (Haskell's
I just wish rEFInd would get an update. It's been out of date for close to
10 months now. I'm just wondering if having more than one maintainer on a
package would help lighten the load. The maintainer of rEFInd has 221 other
packages, so it's understandable that something might slip through on
On 09/01/2016 02:20 PM, Diego Viola wrote:
> Well, I understand maintainers are busy, but it is your job as a
> maintainer to communicate effectively, if I put some package up for
> others to use it, it is MY responsibility to tell users I won't be
> able to update or respond quickly.
>
> You
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 15:20:49 -0300, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
>You can't expect all your users to maintain their own PKGBUILD for
>outdated packages just because some maintainer is busy or being lazy.
ABS was mentioned several times. Is there another rolling release more
up to date and
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 01/09/16 20:32, Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote:
>
>> Yep that's my expectation. There were several times, that a new version
>> with important fixes (fix for YouTube downloading, etc.)
On 01/09/16 20:32, Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote:
Yep that's my expectation. There were several times, that a new version
with important fixes (fix for YouTube downloading, etc.) was released, and
lots of people came to our issue tracker for "broken" YouTube downloading
because the Arch
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 18:58:48 +0200, Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general wrote:
>On 01/09/16 18:54, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
>> I'll need to review the PKGBUILD beforehand or write my
>> own.
>
>This should be done for *ALL* AUR builds actually.
Yesno ;).
Some AUR maintainers, even
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general
wrote:
> On 01/09/16 18:54, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
>>
>> I'll need to review the PKGBUILD beforehand or write my
>> own.
>
>
> This should be done for *ALL* AUR builds actually.
> You should
On 01/09/16 18:54, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
I'll need to review the PKGBUILD beforehand or write my
own.
This should be done for *ALL* AUR builds actually.
You should always be aware of what you are running on your machine,
especially if that involves sudo rights.
Cheers,
Kwang
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:24:08 -0300, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
>> through abs
>
> Yes, I think that's the best approach, I'll do that, thanks.
Hi,
if there should be a good reason to use the latest and greatest from
the minute it is released, ABS [1] is what I use regularly, let alone
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general
wrote:
> On 09/01/2016 12:41 PM, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
>> Sorry, I didn't meant to be rude or be offensive towards the AUR, the
>> AUR is great, but when using things like bitcoin, how can you
On 09/01/2016 12:41 PM, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't meant to be rude or be offensive towards the AUR, the
> AUR is great, but when using things like bitcoin, how can you be safe
> that using bitcoin-qt from the AUR is fine?
>
> What Emily suggested, actually building it
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Jeroen Mathon wrote:
> Random, get your shit from bitcoins site then. :p
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:13 Diego Viola via arch-general,
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:08 PM, D C via arch-general
>>
Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote:
> To be more specific, I'm talking about youtube-dl. I'm currently one of
> youtube-dl maintainers, and I hope Arch users can always get the latest
> version with pacman. Unfortunately, the package in [community] gets
> updates slow in comparison with how
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Emily Shepherd via arch-general
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:13:00PM -0300, Diego Viola via arch-general
> wrote:
>>
>> Thing is, I use bitcoin-qt to get paid for work, and I'm not going to
>> put my hard earned money on random
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:13:00PM -0300, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
Thing is, I use bitcoin-qt to get paid for work, and I'm not going to
put my hard earned money on random AUR packages for this.
The reason I trust the package from the repo is that I'm hoping I can
verify by signing
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Guus Snijders wrote:
> Op 1 sep. 2016 18:00 schreef "Diego Viola via arch-general"
> :
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Doug Newgard
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:42:24 -0300
>>
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Jeroen Mathon via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Some people have projects, or other things that take priority, if you have
> a problem then get the git version from the AUR
>
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:01 Diego Viola via arch-general, <
>
[Topic Closed]
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:14 Diego Viola via arch-general, <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Guus Snijders wrote:
> > Op 1 sep. 2016 18:00 schreef "Diego Viola via arch-general"
> > :
> >>
> >> On
Random, get your shit from bitcoins site then. :p
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:13 Diego Viola via arch-general, <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:08 PM, D C via arch-general
> wrote:
> > Some people don't get the concept of volunteering lol.
>
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Guus Snijders wrote:
> Op 1 sep. 2016 18:00 schreef "Diego Viola via arch-general"
> :
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Doug Newgard
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:42:24 -0300
>>
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:08 PM, D C via arch-general
wrote:
> Some people don't get the concept of volunteering lol.
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Jeroen Mathon via arch-general <
> arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>> Some people have projects, or other
Exactly
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:08 D C via arch-general,
wrote:
> Some people don't get the concept of volunteering lol.
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Jeroen Mathon via arch-general <
> arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> > Some people have projects, or
Some people don't get the concept of volunteering lol.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Jeroen Mathon via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Some people have projects, or other things that take priority, if you have
> a problem then get the git version from the AUR
>
> On Thu, 1
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:42:24 -0300
> Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I flagged this package 10 days ago as out of date and I've been trying
>> to contact the maintainer
Some people have projects, or other things that take priority, if you have
a problem then get the git version from the AUR
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:01 Diego Viola via arch-general, <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Doug Newgard
>
Op 1 sep. 2016 18:00 schreef "Diego Viola via arch-general" <
arch-general@archlinux.org>:
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Doug Newgard
wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:42:24 -0300
> > Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
>
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:42:24 -0300
Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I flagged this package 10 days ago as out of date and I've been trying
> to contact the maintainer about it, with no response.
>
>
Hello,
I flagged this package 10 days ago as out of date and I've been trying
to contact the maintainer about it, with no response.
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/bitcoin-qt/
Is there any problem with updating this? Any reasons for the delay or
lack of response?
Thanks,
36 matches
Mail list logo